Basal-bolus Insulin Therapy Versus Standard Therapy for the Inpatient Management of Type 2 Diabetes: the IDA2 Study
Basal-bolus Insulin Therapy With Insulin Degludec and Insulin Aspart Versus Standard Therapy for the Inpatient Management of Type 2 Diabetes: the IDA2 Study
1 other identifier
interventional
100
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Hyperglycemia during admission is associated with increased rate of complications and longer hospital stays, thus insulin treatment is recommended for all diabetes patients with hyperglycemia. Inpatient studies of non-critically ill patients show better glycemic control with the use of basal-bolus insulin therapy compared to sliding scale insulin therapy, but increased rates of hypoglycemia. The investigators hypothesize that basal-bolus insulin therapy with a new ultra-long-action basal insulin can treat hyperglycemia more efficiently than sliding scale insulin, with few episodes of hypoglycemia.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_4 type-2-diabetes-mellitus
Started Apr 2017
Shorter than P25 for phase_4 type-2-diabetes-mellitus
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 7, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 9, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2018
CompletedAugust 9, 2017
August 1, 2017
1 year
June 7, 2017
August 8, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Difference in mean daily plasma glucose between the two groups
Difference in mean daily plasma glucose between the two groups, calculated by using the four daily pre-meal and bedside PG values per patient.
Duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 8 days
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Mean number and rates of hypoglycemic events (PG ≤ 3.9 mmol/L)
Duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 8 days
Time spent in glycemic range
Duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 8 days
Time spent in hyperglycemic range
Duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 8 days
Length of hospital stay
Duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 8 days
Difference in insulin dose between groups
Duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 8 days
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Intervention
ACTIVE COMPARATORBasal-bolus insulin regime with Insulin Degludec and insulin aspart
Standard
NO INTERVENTIONStandard treatment according to hospital guidelines with sliding scale insulin
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- History of type 2 diabetes for at least 6 months
- Age 18 - 90 years
- Expected hospital stay longer than 4 days
You may not qualify if:
- Hyperglycemia without known history of type 2 diabetes
- Type 1 diabetes mellitus
- Severely impaired renal function (eGFR ≤ 30 mL/min/1,73 m2)
- Severe hepatic disease
- Cardiac disease defined as: Decompensated heart failure (NYHA class III-IV) and/or diagnosis of unstable angina pectoris and/or myocardial infarction within the last 6 months
- Pregnant or lactating women or fertile female patients not using chemical, hormonal or mechanical contraceptives or not in menopause (i.e. must not have had regular menstrual bleeding for at least one year)
- Planned treatment during hospital stay with intravenous glucose/ insulin for ≥ 12 hours
- Treatment at admission or planned treatment during hospital stay with parenteral nutrition or enteral nutrition (i.e. gastroenteric tube feeding)
- Treatment at admission or planned treatment during hospital stay with high dose glucocorticoids (\>40 mg)
- History or presence of malignancy (except basal skin cancer) unless a disease-free period exceeding five years
- Presence of alcohol or drug abuse
- Inability to understand the written information or incapability to provide informed consent
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Merete Bechmann Christensenlead
- Novo Nordisk A/Scollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Hvidovre University Hospital
Hvidovre, 2650, Denmark
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Kirsten B Norgaard, DMSC
Hvidovre University Hospital
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principle investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 7, 2017
First Posted
August 9, 2017
Study Start
April 1, 2017
Primary Completion
April 1, 2018
Study Completion
April 1, 2018
Last Updated
August 9, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-08