Perioperative Complications in Reversed Shoulder Arthroplasties
1 other identifier
observational
105
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Retrospective observational study of reversed shoulder arthroplasties by proximal humeral fracture. Analysis of preoperative risk factors as well as minor and major complications at the first week, 90 days and 1 year.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Jul 2017
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 25, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 31, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 9, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 31, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 31, 2017
CompletedAugust 9, 2017
August 1, 2017
1 month
July 31, 2017
August 3, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (6)
Number of patients affected by minor complications according to preoperative risk (ASA) in reversed shoulder arthroplasties due to complex proximal humeral fractures.
Minor complications are medical complications, which usually don't affect to the functional outcome of arthroplasties
First week after surgery
Number of patients affected by minor complications according to preoperative risk (ASA) in reversed shoulder arthroplasties due to complex proximal humeral fractures.
Minor complications are medical complications, which usually don't affect to the functional outcome of arthroplasties
90 days after surgery
Number of patients affected by minor complications according to preoperative risk (ASA) in reversed shoulder arthroplasties due to complex proximal humeral fractures.
Minor complications are medical complications, which usually don't affect to the functional outcome of arthroplasties
1 year after surgery
Number of patients affected by major complications according to preoperative risk (ASA) in reversed shoulder arthroplasties due to complex proximal humeral fractures.
Major complications are surgical complications( dislocation, periprosthetic fracture, infection) which usually affect to the functional outcome and can lead to a revision surgery
First week after surgery
Number of patients affected by major complications according to preoperative risk (ASA) in reversed shoulder arthroplasties due to complex proximal humeral fractures.
Major complications are surgical complications( dislocation, periprosthetic fracture, infection) which usually affect to the functional outcome and can lead to a revision surgery
90 days after surgery
Number of patients affected by major complications according to preoperative risk (ASA) in reversed shoulder arthroplasties due to complex proximal humeral fractures.
Major complications are surgical complications( dislocation, periprosthetic fracture, infection) which usually affect to the functional outcome and can lead to a revision surgery
1 year after surgery
Secondary Outcomes (16)
Number of patients affected by minor complications after surgery, according to underlying disease
First week after surgery
Number of patients with cardiovascular diseases affected by minor complications after surgery
90 days after surgery
Number of patients with cardiovascular diseases affected by minor complications after surgery
1 year after surgery
Number of patients with cardiovascular diseases affected by major complications after surgery
First week after surgery
Number of patients with cardiovascular diseases affected by major complications after surgery
90 days after surgery
- +11 more secondary outcomes
Eligibility Criteria
Patients undergoing reversed shoulder arthroplasties owing to three or four parts fractures of the proximal humerus
You may qualify if:
- Complex( 3- or 4-part) humerus fractures undergoing reversed shoulder arthroplasties.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau
Barcelona, 08025, Spain
Related Publications (13)
Ferrel JR, Trinh TQ, Fischer RA. Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty versus hemiarthroplasty for proximal humeral fractures: a systematic review. J Orthop Trauma. 2015 Jan;29(1):60-8. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000224.
PMID: 25186842BACKGROUNDBoileau P, Winter M, Cikes A, Han Y, Carles M, Walch G, Schwartz DG. Can surgeons predict what makes a good hemiarthroplasty for fracture? J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2013 Nov;22(11):1495-506. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2013.04.018. Epub 2013 Jul 5.
PMID: 23834993BACKGROUNDBufquin T, Hersan A, Hubert L, Massin P. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of three- and four-part fractures of the proximal humerus in the elderly: a prospective review of 43 cases with a short-term follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007 Apr;89(4):516-20. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.89B4.18435.
PMID: 17463122BACKGROUNDStanbury SJ, Voloshin I. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for acute proximal humeral fractures in the geriatric patient: a review of the literature. Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. 2011 Sep;2(5-6):181-6. doi: 10.1177/2151458511420140.
PMID: 23569688BACKGROUNDCuff DJ, Pupello DR. Comparison of hemiarthroplasty and reverse shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013 Nov 20;95(22):2050-5. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.L.01637.
PMID: 24257664BACKGROUNDBoyle MJ, Youn SM, Frampton CM, Ball CM. Functional outcomes of reverse shoulder arthroplasty compared with hemiarthroplasty for acute proximal humeral fractures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2013 Jan;22(1):32-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2012.03.006. Epub 2012 May 29.
PMID: 22652065BACKGROUNDJones KJ, Dines DM, Gulotta L, Dines JS. Management of proximal humerus fractures utilizing reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2013 Mar;6(1):63-70. doi: 10.1007/s12178-013-9155-1.
PMID: 23334846BACKGROUNDLenarz C, Shishani Y, McCrum C, Nowinski RJ, Edwards TB, Gobezie R. Is reverse shoulder arthroplasty appropriate for the treatment of fractures in the older patient? Early observations. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011 Dec;469(12):3324-31. doi: 10.1007/s11999-011-2055-z.
PMID: 21879403BACKGROUNDChalmers PN, Slikker W 3rd, Mall NA, Gupta AK, Rahman Z, Enriquez D, Nicholson GP. Author reply: reverse total shoulder for acute proximal humeral fracture: comparison to open reduction-internal fixation and hemiarthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2014 Sep;23(9):e222. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2014.05.014. Epub 2014 Jul 24. No abstract available.
PMID: 25066822BACKGROUNDAcevedo DC, Vanbeek C, Lazarus MD, Williams GR, Abboud JA. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for proximal humeral fractures: update on indications, technique, and results. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2014 Feb;23(2):279-89. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2013.10.003.
PMID: 24418780BACKGROUNDMata-Fink A, Meinke M, Jones C, Kim B, Bell JE. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for treatment of proximal humeral fractures in older adults: a systematic review. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2013 Dec;22(12):1737-48. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2013.08.021.
PMID: 24246529BACKGROUNDSebastia-Forcada E, Cebrian-Gomez R, Lizaur-Utrilla A, Gil-Guillen V. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty versus hemiarthroplasty for acute proximal humeral fractures. A blinded, randomized, controlled, prospective study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2014 Oct;23(10):1419-26. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2014.06.035. Epub 2014 Jul 30.
PMID: 25086490BACKGROUNDWall B, Walch G. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of proximal humeral fractures. Hand Clin. 2007 Nov;23(4):425-30, v-vi. doi: 10.1016/j.hcl.2007.08.002.
PMID: 18054669BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Carles Torrens Canovas
Fundació Institut de Recerca de l'Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE ONLY
- Time Perspective
- RETROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 31, 2017
First Posted
August 9, 2017
Study Start
July 25, 2017
Primary Completion
August 31, 2017
Study Completion
August 31, 2017
Last Updated
August 9, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share