NCT03240302

Brief Summary

The aim of this research is to compare sibling oocytes using two sperm selection methods for choosing the best quality spermatozoa before they are injected into oocytes and the influence of each of these methods on embryo quality and IVF outcome.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
50

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2017

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 31, 2017

Completed
7 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 7, 2017

Completed
25 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 1, 2017

Completed
3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 1, 2020

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 1, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

August 7, 2017

Status Verified

August 1, 2017

Enrollment Period

3 years

First QC Date

July 31, 2017

Last Update Submit

August 2, 2017

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Comparison of fertilization rate

    Injected sibling oocytes are incubated in a time-lapse incubator which enables ongoing observation after fertilization and cleavage of each oocyte. The fertilization rates of the ICSI and PICSI methods will be compared.

    Three years

  • Comparison of embryo quality

    Injected sibling oocytes are incubated in a time-lapse incubator which enables ongoing observation after fertilization and cleavage of each oocyte. The embryo quality of the ICSI and PICSI methods will be compared.

    Three years

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Implantation rate

    Three years

  • Pregnancy rate

    Three years

  • Miscarriage rate

    Three years

  • Live birth rate

    Three years

Study Arms (2)

ICSI Procedure

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

The ICSI procedure is the standard procedure of selection and injection of sperm into the oocyte using a standard ICSI petri dish.

Device: ICSI petri dish

PICSI Procedure

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

The PICSI procedure is based on a selection of mature spermatozoa with CD44 receptors and their injection into the oocyte using the PICSI petri dish that has been coated with hyaluronic acid on its bottom.

Device: PICSI petri dish

Interventions

Half of the oocytes will be placed into the standard ICSI petri dish and they will be injected with sperm with normal morphology.

ICSI Procedure

Half of the oocytes will be placed into a PICSI petri dish (whose bottom is coated with hyaluronic acid) and the mature spermatozoa with CD44 receptors that are attached to the bottom of the dish will be injected into them.

PICSI Procedure

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 60 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Males aged 18-60
  • Females aged 18-35
  • Males with mild OTA (oligo terato astheno zoospermia) and at least one failed IVF cycle
  • Males with normozoospermia with at least 2 unexplained failed IVF cycles
  • Females with normal FSH and normal AMH values
  • Females who have retrieved in previous cycles at least 6 oocytes

You may not qualify if:

  • Couples who have been exposed to heavy smoking, drugs and chronic diseases
  • Males who have undergone testicular surgery (TESE) or defined as severe OTA
  • Females with egg factor infertility

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Hillel Yaffe Medical Center

Hadera, 38100, Israel

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Infertility

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Genital DiseasesUrogenital Diseases

Study Officials

  • Einat Shalom Paz, MD

    Hillel Yaffe Medical Center

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Medeia Michaeli, PhD

    Hillel Yaffe Medical Center

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Central Study Contacts

Medeia Michaeli, PhD

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NON RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER GOV
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 31, 2017

First Posted

August 7, 2017

Study Start

September 1, 2017

Primary Completion

September 1, 2020

Study Completion

September 1, 2020

Last Updated

August 7, 2017

Record last verified: 2017-08

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations