Performance of a New REsting Pressure Index During Invasive Angiography Compared To Adenosine Hyperemic FFR
PREDICT
1 other identifier
observational
100
4 countries
6
Brief Summary
To test the feasibility and diagnostic accuracy of a new automated pressure derived resting index (Pd/Pamin), using FFR as gold standard, in de novo coronary lesions in which invasive physiological evaluation is warranted.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Oct 2016
6 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 28, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 31, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 2, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2018
CompletedMay 11, 2018
May 1, 2018
1.8 years
July 31, 2017
May 9, 2018
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Diagnostic accuracy of Pd/Pamin vs FFR
Agreement will be tested using the established FFR 0.8 threshold as the binary reference standard.
baseline
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Discriminative power of Pd/Pamin and the best cut-off, taking FFR as gold
baseline
Feasibility of Pd/Pamin measurements
Baseline
Study Arms (1)
Prospective cohort
Prospective cohort of patients with stable or stabilized coronary artery disease and de novo coronary lesions, in whom functional evaluation is performed, according do standard clinical indications.
Eligibility Criteria
Consecutive subjects scheduled for coronary angiography or PCI in whom operator decides to perform FFR will be approached for enrollment. Being a first-in-man study of a novel pressure index intended for future validation and use in a clinical setting, a full assessment of its range throughout the entire spectrum of lesion severity is warranted. As such, the protocol will allow for the inclusion of both less severe as well as of critical (\>90%) lesions. Patients with either single or multiple vessel disease will be included. Data on additional lesions may or may not be collected but will not be used in the study. Vessels with sequential stenosis and tandem lesions will be evaluated and treated according to routine clinical practice, but not included in the study data collected.
You may qualify if:
- Patients undergoing FFR assessment for standard clinical indications, according to individual operator decision.
- Age ≥ 18 years.
- Provided signed written informed consent for data collection the collection.
- De novo coronary artery disease in target vessel.
- Single or multiple vessel disease.
- Patient eligible for elective or ad hoc PCI (or CABG), if revascularization is deemed indicated, in the setting of stable coronary artery disease or non-culprit lesions of non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes (only in deferred procedures).
- Stenosis deemed amenable for both evaluation with a pressure wire and for potential revascularization.
You may not qualify if:
- Subjects with restenosis in the target vessel.
- Known severe renal insufficiency (examples being but not limited to eGFR \<30 ml/kg/min, serum creatinine ≥ 2.5 mg/dL or on dialysis).
- Aorto-ostial lesion location within 3 mm of the aorta junction (both right and left).
- Vessel(s) and lesion(s) not amenable for evaluation with a PressureWire™ and/or revascularization.
- Tandem lesions
- Moderate lesions in patients with multivessel disease in whom at least one lesion in another major epicardic vessel is severe (to minimize lesion interaction), unless the severe lesion is treated first (see above).
- Left ventricular ejection fraction \<50%
- Known severe left ventricular hypertrophy
- Atrial fibrillation or any other significant arrhythmia (including an heart rate \<50/min on sinus rhythm)
- Systolic blood pressure \<90 mmHg.
- Any other medical condition that in the opinion of the investigator will interfere with patient safety or study results
- Currently participating in another clinical study that interferes with study results.
- Pregnant or nursing females
- Planned or prior heart transplantation or listed for heart transplant.
- Any condition that precludes the subject from undergoing PCI or any of the protocol mandated procedures, for example subjects with a prior history heparin induced thrombocytopenia, known intolerance to adenosine or with a contra-indication for dual anti-platelet therapy.
- +4 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Ocidentallead
- Abbott Medical Devicescollaborator
- Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New Yorkcollaborator
Study Sites (6)
St. Francis Hospital The Heart Center
New York, New York, 11576, United States
Department of Cardiology, University Hospital
Lille, France
Institute of Cardiology, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart
Rome, Italy
Hospital Prof. Doutor Fernando da Fonseca
Amadora, 2720-276, Portugal
Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Ocidental - Hospital de Santa Cruz
Carnaxide, 2790-134, Portugal
Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central (CHLC) - Hospital de Santa Marta
Lisbon, Portugal
Related Publications (8)
Levine GN, Bates ER, Blankenship JC, Bailey SR, Bittl JA, Cercek B, Chambers CE, Ellis SG, Guyton RA, Hollenberg SM, Khot UN, Lange RA, Mauri L, Mehran R, Moussa ID, Mukherjee D, Nallamothu BK, Ting HH; American College of Cardiology Foundation; American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines; Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions. 2011 ACCF/AHA/SCAI Guideline for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 Dec 6;58(24):e44-122. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.08.007. Epub 2011 Nov 7. No abstract available.
PMID: 22070834BACKGROUNDTask Force on Myocardial Revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS); European Association for Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI); Wijns W, Kolh P, Danchin N, Di Mario C, Falk V, Folliguet T, Garg S, Huber K, James S, Knuuti J, Lopez-Sendon J, Marco J, Menicanti L, Ostojic M, Piepoli MF, Pirlet C, Pomar JL, Reifart N, Ribichini FL, Schalij MJ, Sergeant P, Serruys PW, Silber S, Sousa Uva M, Taggart D. Guidelines on myocardial revascularization. Eur Heart J. 2010 Oct;31(20):2501-55. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehq277. Epub 2010 Aug 29. No abstract available.
PMID: 20802248BACKGROUNDMamas MA, Horner S, Welch E, Ashworth A, Millington S, Fraser D, Fath-Ordoubadi F, Neyses L, El-Omar M. Resting Pd/Pa measured with intracoronary pressure wire strongly predicts fractional flow reserve. J Invasive Cardiol. 2010 Jun;22(6):260-5.
PMID: 20516504BACKGROUNDSen S, Escaned J, Malik IS, Mikhail GW, Foale RA, Mila R, Tarkin J, Petraco R, Broyd C, Jabbour R, Sethi A, Baker CS, Bellamy M, Al-Bustami M, Hackett D, Khan M, Lefroy D, Parker KH, Hughes AD, Francis DP, Di Mario C, Mayet J, Davies JE. Development and validation of a new adenosine-independent index of stenosis severity from coronary wave-intensity analysis: results of the ADVISE (ADenosine Vasodilator Independent Stenosis Evaluation) study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Apr 10;59(15):1392-402. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.11.003. Epub 2011 Dec 7.
PMID: 22154731BACKGROUNDGanz P, Abben R, Friedman PL, Garnic JD, Barry WH, Levin DC. Usefulness of transstenotic coronary pressure gradient measurements during diagnostic catheterization. Am J Cardiol. 1985 Apr 1;55(8):910-4. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(85)90716-7.
PMID: 3157307BACKGROUNDGruntzig AR, Senning A, Siegenthaler WE. Nonoperative dilatation of coronary-artery stenosis: percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. N Engl J Med. 1979 Jul 12;301(2):61-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197907123010201.
PMID: 449946BACKGROUNDBerry C, van 't Veer M, Witt N, Kala P, Bocek O, Pyxaras SA, McClure JD, Fearon WF, Barbato E, Tonino PA, De Bruyne B, Pijls NH, Oldroyd KG. VERIFY (VERification of Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio and Fractional Flow Reserve for the Assessment of Coronary Artery Stenosis Severity in EverydaY Practice): a multicenter study in consecutive patients. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Apr 2;61(13):1421-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.09.065. Epub 2013 Feb 6.
PMID: 23395076BACKGROUNDGanz P, Harrington DP, Gaspar J, Barry WH. Phasic pressure gradients across coronary and renal artery stenoses in humans. Am Heart J. 1983 Dec;106(6):1399-406. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(83)90052-2.
PMID: 6650363BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Luis Raposo, MD
Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Ocidental
- STUDY CHAIR
Sergio Bravo Baptista, MD, PhD
Hospital Fernando da Fonseca
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER GOV
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 31, 2017
First Posted
August 2, 2017
Study Start
October 28, 2016
Primary Completion
September 1, 2018
Study Completion
September 1, 2018
Last Updated
May 11, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share