The Impact of a Diabetes Risk Prediction Model in Primary Care.
A Cluster Randomized Trial to Investigate the Impact of a Type 2 Diabetes Risk Prediction Model on Change in Physical Activity Within Routine Health Checks in Primary Care.
1 other identifier
interventional
315
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Little evidence exists on the impact of diabetes risk scores, e.g. on physicians and patient's behavior, perceived risk of persons, shared-decision making and particularly on patient´s health. The aim of this study is to investigate the impact of a non-invasive diabetes risk prediction model in the primary health care setting as component of routine health checks on change in physical activity.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable type-2-diabetes-mellitus
Started Sep 2017
Longer than P75 for not_applicable type-2-diabetes-mellitus
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 13, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 31, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 13, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 10, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 10, 2021
CompletedAugust 10, 2021
August 1, 2021
3.4 years
July 13, 2017
August 9, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Difference of participant's physical activity at twelve months after the routine health check between the groups.
Self-reported outcome, international validated questionnaire Physical Activity Questionnaire Short Last 7 Days Format (IPAQ-SF), which has been shown to be a reliable and valid tool to obtain comparable estimates of physical activity.
at baseline, 6 and 12 months follow-up
Secondary Outcomes (11)
Improvement in the counseling process assessed by PCPs.
at baseline and up to one year after the PCP entered the study
Improvement in the counseling process assessed by participants.
at 6 months follow-up
Improvement of shared decision making, assessed by participants.
at baseline
Improvement of shared decision making, assessed by PCPs.
at baseline
Improved motivation to change lifestyle, assessed by participants.
at baseline, 6 and 12 months follow-up
- +6 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (1)
Change on participant's individual diabetes risk.
at baseline, 6 and 12 months follow-up
Study Arms (2)
Intervention group
EXPERIMENTALIn the intervention group the routine health check is expanded by usage of a non-invasive diabetes risk score.
Control group
NO INTERVENTIONIn the control group the routine health check is conducted.
Interventions
The risk prediction model will be integrated into a routine health check. The diabetes risk prediction model contains modifiable non-invasive risk factors and consists of eleven questions on age, height, waist circumference, hypertension, physical activity, smoking status, intake of whole-grain bread, intake of red meat, coffee consumption, and family history of diabetes (parents and siblings) to predict the five-year diabetes risk. The filled diabetes risk score will be used in the counseling interview with the PCP at the end of the health check as a practical guide to discuss individual tailored preventive strategies.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- general practitioners, medical practitioners and internists working as general practitioners with and without further training in diabetology according to German Diabetes Association standards
- provide the routine health check
You may not qualify if:
- treat exclusively patients with private insurance
- treat exclusively diabetes patients in a specialized medical practice
- appointment for the routine health check
- insured in statutory health insurance
- age \> 35 years
- Body Mass Index (BMI) of ≥ 27 kg/m2
- type 1 or type 2 diabetes diagnosis or already abnormal blood glucose level (fasting glucose ≥ 126 mg/dl or 2 hours oral glucose tolerance test (oGTT) ≥ 200mg/dl or glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) ≥6,5%) before the routine health check
- no sufficient German language skills to fill in the questionnaires
- presence of an incurable disease with a prognosis of less than one year
- severe mental illness or dementia
- severe underlying disease, which largely impairs physical activity
- pregnancy
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
German Diabetes Center, Institute for Biometrics and Epidemiology
Düsseldorf, North Rhine-Westphalia, 40225, Germany
Related Publications (6)
Dhippayom T, Chaiyakunapruk N, Krass I. How diabetes risk assessment tools are implemented in practice: a systematic review. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2014 Jun;104(3):329-42. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2014.01.008. Epub 2014 Jan 15.
PMID: 24485859BACKGROUNDNoble D, Mathur R, Dent T, Meads C, Greenhalgh T. Risk models and scores for type 2 diabetes: systematic review. BMJ. 2011 Nov 28;343:d7163. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d7163.
PMID: 22123912BACKGROUNDGodino JG, van Sluijs EM, Marteau TM, Sutton S, Sharp SJ, Griffin SJ. Lifestyle Advice Combined with Personalized Estimates of Genetic or Phenotypic Risk of Type 2 Diabetes, and Objectively Measured Physical Activity: A Randomized Controlled Trial. PLoS Med. 2016 Nov 29;13(11):e1002185. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002185. eCollection 2016 Nov.
PMID: 27898672BACKGROUNDMuller-Riemenschneider F, Holmberg C, Rieckmann N, Kliems H, Rufer V, Muller-Nordhorn J, Willich SN. Barriers to routine risk-score use for healthy primary care patients: survey and qualitative study. Arch Intern Med. 2010 Apr 26;170(8):719-24. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2010.66.
PMID: 20421559BACKGROUNDSeidel-Jacobs E, Kohl F, Tamayo M, Rosenbauer J, Schulze MB, Kuss O, Rathmann W. Impact of applying a diabetes risk score in primary care on change in physical activity: a pragmatic cluster randomised trial. Acta Diabetol. 2022 Aug;59(8):1031-1040. doi: 10.1007/s00592-022-01895-y. Epub 2022 May 13.
PMID: 35551495DERIVEDJacobs E, Tamayo M, Rosenbauer J, Schulze MB, Kuss O, Rathmann W. Protocol of a cluster randomized trial to investigate the impact of a type 2 diabetes risk prediction model on change in physical activity in primary care. BMC Endocr Disord. 2018 Oct 16;18(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s12902-018-0299-2.
PMID: 30326888DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Wolfgang Rathmann, Prof.
German Diabetes Center
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- PD Dr. Wolfgang Rathmann MSPH (USA)
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 13, 2017
First Posted
July 31, 2017
Study Start
September 13, 2017
Primary Completion
February 10, 2021
Study Completion
February 10, 2021
Last Updated
August 10, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL
- Time Frame
- 12 months
- Access Criteria
- Universities and other non-profit organizations
Twelve months after data publication, de-identified data can be provided to other researchers upon request.