NCT03234322

Brief Summary

Little evidence exists on the impact of diabetes risk scores, e.g. on physicians and patient's behavior, perceived risk of persons, shared-decision making and particularly on patient´s health. The aim of this study is to investigate the impact of a non-invasive diabetes risk prediction model in the primary health care setting as component of routine health checks on change in physical activity.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
315

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable type-2-diabetes-mellitus

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2017

Longer than P75 for not_applicable type-2-diabetes-mellitus

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 13, 2017

Completed
18 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 31, 2017

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 13, 2017

Completed
3.4 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 10, 2021

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

February 10, 2021

Completed
Last Updated

August 10, 2021

Status Verified

August 1, 2021

Enrollment Period

3.4 years

First QC Date

July 13, 2017

Last Update Submit

August 9, 2021

Conditions

Keywords

preventionrisk scorebehaviourphysical activity

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Difference of participant's physical activity at twelve months after the routine health check between the groups.

    Self-reported outcome, international validated questionnaire Physical Activity Questionnaire Short Last 7 Days Format (IPAQ-SF), which has been shown to be a reliable and valid tool to obtain comparable estimates of physical activity.

    at baseline, 6 and 12 months follow-up

Secondary Outcomes (11)

  • Improvement in the counseling process assessed by PCPs.

    at baseline and up to one year after the PCP entered the study

  • Improvement in the counseling process assessed by participants.

    at 6 months follow-up

  • Improvement of shared decision making, assessed by participants.

    at baseline

  • Improvement of shared decision making, assessed by PCPs.

    at baseline

  • Improved motivation to change lifestyle, assessed by participants.

    at baseline, 6 and 12 months follow-up

  • +6 more secondary outcomes

Other Outcomes (1)

  • Change on participant's individual diabetes risk.

    at baseline, 6 and 12 months follow-up

Study Arms (2)

Intervention group

EXPERIMENTAL

In the intervention group the routine health check is expanded by usage of a non-invasive diabetes risk score.

Other: external validated risk prediction model

Control group

NO INTERVENTION

In the control group the routine health check is conducted.

Interventions

The risk prediction model will be integrated into a routine health check. The diabetes risk prediction model contains modifiable non-invasive risk factors and consists of eleven questions on age, height, waist circumference, hypertension, physical activity, smoking status, intake of whole-grain bread, intake of red meat, coffee consumption, and family history of diabetes (parents and siblings) to predict the five-year diabetes risk. The filled diabetes risk score will be used in the counseling interview with the PCP at the end of the health check as a practical guide to discuss individual tailored preventive strategies.

Also known as: The German Diabetes Risk Score
Intervention group

Eligibility Criteria

Age35 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • general practitioners, medical practitioners and internists working as general practitioners with and without further training in diabetology according to German Diabetes Association standards
  • provide the routine health check

You may not qualify if:

  • treat exclusively patients with private insurance
  • treat exclusively diabetes patients in a specialized medical practice
  • appointment for the routine health check
  • insured in statutory health insurance
  • age \> 35 years
  • Body Mass Index (BMI) of ≥ 27 kg/m2
  • type 1 or type 2 diabetes diagnosis or already abnormal blood glucose level (fasting glucose ≥ 126 mg/dl or 2 hours oral glucose tolerance test (oGTT) ≥ 200mg/dl or glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) ≥6,5%) before the routine health check
  • no sufficient German language skills to fill in the questionnaires
  • presence of an incurable disease with a prognosis of less than one year
  • severe mental illness or dementia
  • severe underlying disease, which largely impairs physical activity
  • pregnancy

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

German Diabetes Center, Institute for Biometrics and Epidemiology

Düsseldorf, North Rhine-Westphalia, 40225, Germany

Location

Related Publications (6)

  • Dhippayom T, Chaiyakunapruk N, Krass I. How diabetes risk assessment tools are implemented in practice: a systematic review. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2014 Jun;104(3):329-42. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2014.01.008. Epub 2014 Jan 15.

    PMID: 24485859BACKGROUND
  • Noble D, Mathur R, Dent T, Meads C, Greenhalgh T. Risk models and scores for type 2 diabetes: systematic review. BMJ. 2011 Nov 28;343:d7163. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d7163.

    PMID: 22123912BACKGROUND
  • Godino JG, van Sluijs EM, Marteau TM, Sutton S, Sharp SJ, Griffin SJ. Lifestyle Advice Combined with Personalized Estimates of Genetic or Phenotypic Risk of Type 2 Diabetes, and Objectively Measured Physical Activity: A Randomized Controlled Trial. PLoS Med. 2016 Nov 29;13(11):e1002185. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002185. eCollection 2016 Nov.

    PMID: 27898672BACKGROUND
  • Muller-Riemenschneider F, Holmberg C, Rieckmann N, Kliems H, Rufer V, Muller-Nordhorn J, Willich SN. Barriers to routine risk-score use for healthy primary care patients: survey and qualitative study. Arch Intern Med. 2010 Apr 26;170(8):719-24. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2010.66.

    PMID: 20421559BACKGROUND
  • Seidel-Jacobs E, Kohl F, Tamayo M, Rosenbauer J, Schulze MB, Kuss O, Rathmann W. Impact of applying a diabetes risk score in primary care on change in physical activity: a pragmatic cluster randomised trial. Acta Diabetol. 2022 Aug;59(8):1031-1040. doi: 10.1007/s00592-022-01895-y. Epub 2022 May 13.

  • Jacobs E, Tamayo M, Rosenbauer J, Schulze MB, Kuss O, Rathmann W. Protocol of a cluster randomized trial to investigate the impact of a type 2 diabetes risk prediction model on change in physical activity in primary care. BMC Endocr Disord. 2018 Oct 16;18(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s12902-018-0299-2.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2BehaviorMotor Activity

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Diabetes MellitusGlucose Metabolism DisordersMetabolic DiseasesNutritional and Metabolic DiseasesEndocrine System Diseases

Study Officials

  • Wolfgang Rathmann, Prof.

    German Diabetes Center

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: A pragmatic blinded parallel group superiority cluster randomized controlled trial. Clusters are PCPs (general practitioners, medical practitioners and internists working as general practitioners).
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
PD Dr. Wolfgang Rathmann MSPH (USA)

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 13, 2017

First Posted

July 31, 2017

Study Start

September 13, 2017

Primary Completion

February 10, 2021

Study Completion

February 10, 2021

Last Updated

August 10, 2021

Record last verified: 2021-08

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

Twelve months after data publication, de-identified data can be provided to other researchers upon request.

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL
Time Frame
12 months
Access Criteria
Universities and other non-profit organizations

Locations