The Effects of Acupuncture and the Therapist´s Communication on Chemotherapy Induced Nausea and Vomiting
1 other identifier
interventional
198
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Background: Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) is a common and burdensome side-effect of emetogenic chemotherapy. CINV affects both the patient's quality of life and induces high costs within the health-care system. Many patients are interested in acupuncture, despite weak scrientific evidence for its effects beside non-specific effects. Few credibly sham-controlled studies have previously been conducted. The therapist's care and communication during acupuncture as well as during standard care may induce non-specific effects, such as placebo effects, potentially driven by the patient's expectations. It is not known if the type of communication, in terms of how positive the therapist communicates regarding expected effects, affects the effect of antiemetic treatments. Aims: To investigate if CINV, treatment expectancy and quality of life differ between patients who receive A) standard care including antiemetics, B) standard care plus sham acupuncture or C) standard treatment plus genuine acupuncture by a therapist who emphasizes the positive expected outcomes of the treatment, compared to a therapist who communicates neutral regarding the expected outcomes. Procedure: The eligible patients will be randomized to A) standard antiemetic treatment or to B) standard antiemetic treatment plus sham acupuncture or C) standard antiemetic treatment plus genuine acupuncture. Within the three groups, the patients are randomized to receive either neutral or positive communication from the therapist during the treatment. Outcome measures: The primary outcome is intensity of nausea within the five days after the chemotherapy session in patients receiving positive or neutral communication. Data collection of nausea and vomiting, expectations, and quality of life is performed at baseline the day before the studied chemotherapy session, during 10 days after the studied chemotherapy session, and at a follow-up ten days after the last chemotherapy session.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable breast-cancer
Started Sep 2017
Longer than P75 for not_applicable breast-cancer
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 24, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 28, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 23, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 15, 2025
CompletedAugust 24, 2025
August 1, 2025
7.8 years
July 24, 2017
August 18, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Average nausea intensity day 1-5 (the day of the current chemotherapy session and the four following days).
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS).
In the morning of day 1-5 (the day of chemotherapy and the four following days).
Secondary Outcomes (9)
The patient´s treatment expectations
Every morning day 1-10 (the day of the current chemotherapy session and the 10 following days).
Level of well-being
Four times: The day before the current chemotherapy session, 5 and 10 days after the current chemotherapy session, and 10 days after the very last chemotherapy session.
Level of well-being
Three times: The day before the current chemotherapy session, 10 days after the current chemotherapy session, and 10 days after the very last chemotherapy session.
Level of well-being
Three times: The day before the current chemotherapy session, 10 days after the current chemotherapy session, and 10 days after the very last chemotherapy session.
Level of activity
Four times: The day before the current chemotherapy session, 5 and 10 days after the current chemotherapy session, and 10 days after the very last chemotherapy session.
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (2)
Cost-analyzes.
Emesis outcomes are measured every morning day 1-10 (the day of the current chemotherapy session and the 10 following days).
Cortisol concentration
Two times: directly before and after the acupuncture or control intervention.
Study Arms (3)
Standard care (A)
OTHERStandard antiemetic treatment (A) with neutral communication (A1) or positive communication (A2)
Sham acupuncture (B)
PLACEBO COMPARATORStandard antiemetic treatment plus Sham acupuncture (B) with neutral communication (B1) or positive communication (B2)
Genuine acupuncture (C)
EXPERIMENTALStandard antiemetic treatment plus Genuine acupuncture (C) with neutral communication (C1) or positive communication (C2)
Interventions
C) Acupuncture will be administered bilaterally to the standard antiemetic point PC6 located two body-inches proximal of the wrist crease, between the tendons of palmaris longus and flexor carpi radialis. Sharp acupuncture needles will be inserted into a depth of a half body-inch. The needles will be manipulated three times (at the start, middle and end of the treatment session) by twirling and lifting until deqi occurres. Within the group, the patients will be randomized to two communication types: 1) neutral communication or 2) strengthened positive communication regarding expected antiemetic effects of their treatment, using a standardized communication model.
A) Standard antiemetic treatment means receiving ordinary antiemetic medications. Within the group, the patients will be randomized to two communication types: 1) neutral communication or 2) strengthened positive communication regarding expected antiemetic effects of their treatment, using a standardized communication model.
B) Sham acupuncture is administered bilaterally to a non-acupuncture point two body-inches proximal and one body-inch radial from PC6 using the telescopic Park Sham Device. The sham-needle is blunt and glides upward into its handle instead of penetrating. Marking tubes hold the needle in place. The therapist gives an illusion of manipulating the needle by turning it three times until it touches the skin, but no specific needle sensation ("deqi") will occur. Within the group, the patients will be randomized to two communication types: 1) neutral communication or 2) strengthened positive communication regarding expected antiemetic effects of their treatment, using a standardized communication model.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients of at least 18 years of age
- Breast, colorectal, bladder, or testicular cancer
- Receiving adjuvant or neo-adjuvant intravenous chemotherapy inducing medium or high risk for emesis
- Willing and capable to give their informed consent and to take part of the treatment and data collection procedure
You may not qualify if:
- Consumption of antiemetics or experiences of persistent nausea, which will persist within 24 hours prior to the start of the chemotherapy session
- Hemophilia
- Former participation in the same study
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Västernorrland County Council, Swedenlead
- Falu Hospitalcollaborator
- University of Gavlecollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Sundsvall Hospital
Sundsvall, SE-85186, Sweden
Related Publications (1)
Ylva W, Per F, Erling E, Anna E. Design of a Randomized Sham-Controlled Trial: Strengthening Positive Treatment Expectations Using a Communication Model for Maximized Antiemetic Effects of Acupuncture and Antiemetics During Emetogenic Neo-/Adjuvant Chemotherapy. Integr Cancer Ther. 2025 Jan-Dec;24:15347354251361464. doi: 10.1177/15347354251361464. Epub 2025 Aug 22.
PMID: 40844814DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Anna E Efverman, PhD
University of Gavle
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- All other care providers beside the acupuncture/sham providing therapists are blinded to randomization group. For example, care providers providing the standard antiemetic treatment and the chemotherapy per se are blinded regarding randomization group.
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- FACTORIAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER GOV
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Study coordinator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 24, 2017
First Posted
July 28, 2017
Study Start
September 1, 2017
Primary Completion
June 23, 2025
Study Completion
August 15, 2025
Last Updated
August 24, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share