Effect of Ramosetron on Heart Rate-corrected QT Interval During Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy With Steep Trendelenburg Position
1 other identifier
interventional
54
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Intraperitoneal insufflation of carbon dioxide may affect the sympathetic activity that leads to changes in ventricular re-polarization. This in turn can result in changes of heart rate-corrected QT (QTc) interval. Ramosetron is a 5-hydroxytryptamine three receptor antagonist and widely used anti-emetics. However, QTc interval prolongation has been observed in a number of patients after administration of 5-HT3 receptor antagonists. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effects of ramosetron on QTc interval and possible cardiovascular adverse effects during robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy with steep Trendelenburg position.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable prostate-cancer
Started Aug 2017
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 25, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 27, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 9, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 12, 2020
CompletedAugust 25, 2020
August 1, 2020
2.9 years
July 25, 2017
August 23, 2020
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (8)
Maximum change of QTc interval
Maximum change of QTc interval from continuous ECG monitoring in lead V5 were collected by using the LabChart software.
Before induction of anesthesia in the supine position (Baseline)
Maximum change of QTc interval
Maximum change of QTc interval from continuous ECG monitoring in lead V5 were collected by using the LabChart software.
10 minutes after tracheal intubation (Intu-10 min.)
Maximum change of QTc interval
Maximum change of QTc interval from continuous ECG monitoring in lead V5 were collected by using the LabChart software.
immediately after steep Trendelenburg position with CO2 pneumoperitoneum (T-on)
Maximum change of QTc interval
Maximum change of QTc interval from continuous ECG monitoring in lead V5 were collected by using the LabChart software.
30 minutes after steep Trendelenburg position with CO2 pneumoperitoneum (T-30 min)
Maximum change of QTc interval
Maximum change of QTc interval from continuous ECG monitoring in lead V5 were collected by using the LabChart software.
60 minutes after steep Trendelenburg position with CO2 pneumoperitoneum (T-60 min)
Maximum change of QTc interval
Maximum change of QTc interval from continuous ECG monitoring in lead V5 were collected by using the LabChart software.
90 minutes after steep Trendelenburg position with CO2 pneumoperitoneum (T-90 min)
Maximum change of QTc interval
Maximum change of QTc interval from continuous ECG monitoring in lead V5 were collected by using the LabChart software.
immediately after a supine position with CO2 desufflation (T-off)
Maximum change of QTc interval
Maximum change of QTc interval from continuous ECG monitoring in lead V5 were collected by using the LabChart software.
at the end of surgery (Surgery end)
Study Arms (2)
Ramosetron group
EXPERIMENTALRandomly selected patients of the ramoseton group are given a 0.3 mg of ramosetron after induction.
Placebo group
PLACEBO COMPARATORIn contrast, patients in the control group are given the same volume of normal saline after induction and given a 0.3 mg of ramosetron after measurement of QTc interval.
Interventions
Randomly selected patients of the ramoseton group are given a 0.3 mg of ramosetron after induction.
In contrast, patients in the control group are given the same volume of normal saline after induction and given a 0.3 mg of ramosetron after measurement of QTc interval.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy
- Age more than 19 years
You may not qualify if:
- Preoperative electrocardiography (ECG) abnormalities, including a QTc interval of \>500 ms, ventricular conduction abnormalities, or arrhythmias
- History of cardiac disease such as pacemaker insertion, unstable angina
- Use of antiarrhythmic agents or medications that are known to prolong the QTc interval
- Abnormal levels of preoperative serum electrolyte
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Professor, Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine
Seoul, 03722, South Korea
Related Publications (3)
Kim TK, Cho YJ, Lim CW, Min JJ, Choi EK, Hong DM, Jeon Y. Effect of ramosetron on QTc interval: a randomised controlled trial in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery. BMC Anesthesiol. 2016 Aug 3;16(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s12871-016-0222-1.
PMID: 27488394RESULTLee JH, Yoo EK, Song IK, Kim JT, Kim HS. Effect of ramosetron on the QT interval during sevoflurane anaesthesia in children: a prospective observational study. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2015 May;32(5):330-5. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000200.
PMID: 25485883RESULTKim SH, Lee SM, Kim YK, Park SY, Lee JH, Cho SH, Chai WS, Jin HC. Effects of prophylactic ramosetron and ondansetron on corrected QT interval during general anesthesia. J Clin Anesth. 2014 Nov;26(7):511-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2014.02.011. Epub 2014 Oct 18.
PMID: 25439413RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
- Masking Details
- Participants, care provider and investigator are blinded to group assignment.
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 25, 2017
First Posted
July 27, 2017
Study Start
August 1, 2017
Primary Completion
June 9, 2020
Study Completion
June 12, 2020
Last Updated
August 25, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share