NCT03231579

Brief Summary

This multi-site study will enroll approximately 100 CLL patients across 5 cancer institutions. The aim of the project is to ensure hematology care teams that are participating in new value-based reimbursement models have an accurate understanding of the evidence and roles of new therapies for CLL and best practice supportive care protocols to proactively assess, monitor, and manage symptoms to promote successful clinical outcomes. Hematology teams at seven health systems across the U.S. will be given online clinical training on the latest evidence for treatment planning in CLL along with best supportive care practices for patients on novel CLL treatments, prior to using Carevive's patient engagement software. Once training is complete, the Carevive software will be employed in the clinic whereby CLL patients will use the Carevive patient portal to report any symptoms at and in between clinic visits. Patients will be given a user name and password to a web-based portal for 24/7 reporting of symptoms experienced. Patient-reported and clinical data will be processed by the Carevive rules engine technology to generate evidence-based supportive care plans providing patients with direction regarding self-management strategies, care coordination for relevant cancer center services, and direction on when to go to the emergency department (ED) or call their hematologist based on their institution's protocol. For patients who require ongoing and routine monitoring, such supportive care recommendations will be included in supportive care plans generated at the clinic visit. On the visits subsequent to the delivery of the care plan, patients will report on the perceived effectiveness of the intervention (or barriers to non-adherence to the intervention). Patients and clinicians will assess symptom severity at each visit for a 16-week period and both data sets will be stored and analyzed for research purposes.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
85

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2017

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 21, 2017

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 21, 2017

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 27, 2017

Completed
1.3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 1, 2018

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 31, 2019

Completed
Last Updated

August 28, 2019

Status Verified

August 1, 2019

Enrollment Period

1.3 years

First QC Date

July 21, 2017

Last Update Submit

August 23, 2019

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Patient perception of the overall effectiveness, acceptability, and usability of bi-directional web-based technology to self-report symptom prevalence and severity and receive management recommendations

    Patients will be asked to rate how acceptable, effective, and usable the web-based technology was using a 5-item system usability measure. The data will then be analyzed in order to describe the patient perceptions of the intervention

    Year 1

  • Longitudinal symptom experience of patients with CLL

    Data collected on the Carevive CPS using the PRO-CTCAE and ESASr tools will be analyzed in order to describe the longitudinal symptom experience

    Year 1

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • ER utilization and hospitalization in elderly patients with CLL

    Year 1

  • Patterns of change in provider decision making over time for patients with CLL

    Year 1

Interventions

Carevive CPSBEHAVIORAL

This intervention will focus on the use of the Carevive CPS, enabling providers to deliver evidence-based and personalized treatment care plans to their CLL patients on/starting treatment. The Carevive CPS collects electronic patient reported outcomes (ePROs) and clinical data, reported and generated by clinical staff and/or peer-reviewed evidence, and includes patient education, resources, and referrals developed by cancer clinicians and researchers.

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Patients with a diagnosis of CLL

You may qualify if:

  • All participants must be 18 years of age or older.
  • Patient participants must have a diagnosis of CLL, and either be on active treatment or need first-line treatment.
  • Patient participants must be able to access a web-based portal.
  • All participants must be able to understand English.

You may not qualify if:

  • Any patient who cannot understand written or spoken English.
  • Any prisoner and/or other vulnerable persons as defined by NIH (45 CFR 46, Subpart B, C, and D).

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Moffitt Cancer Institute

Tampa, Florida, 33612, United States

Location

Related Publications (5)

  • Brown JR, Hallek MJ, Pagel JM. Chemoimmunotherapy Versus Targeted Treatment in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: When, How Long, How Much, and in Which Combination? Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2016;35:e387-98. doi: 10.1200/EDBK_159018.

    PMID: 27249745BACKGROUND
  • Cramer P, Hallek M, Eichhorst B. State-of-the-Art Treatment and Novel Agents in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia. Oncol Res Treat. 2016;39(1-2):25-32. doi: 10.1159/000443903. Epub 2016 Jan 22.

    PMID: 26890007BACKGROUND
  • Kolodziej M, Hoverman JR, Garey JS, Espirito J, Sheth S, Ginsburg A, Neubauer MA, Patt D, Brooks B, White C, Sitarik M, Anderson R, Beveridge R. Benchmarks for value in cancer care: an analysis of a large commercial population. J Oncol Pract. 2011 Sep;7(5):301-6. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2011.000394.

    PMID: 22211126BACKGROUND
  • Tucci A, Ferrari S, Bottelli C, Borlenghi E, Drera M, Rossi G. A comprehensive geriatric assessment is more effective than clinical judgment to identify elderly diffuse large cell lymphoma patients who benefit from aggressive therapy. Cancer. 2009 Oct 1;115(19):4547-53. doi: 10.1002/cncr.24490.

    PMID: 19562776BACKGROUND
  • Bellera C, Praud D, Petit-Moneger A, McKelvie-Sebileau P, Soubeyran P, Mathoulin-Pelissier S. Barriers to inclusion of older adults in randomised controlled clinical trials on Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: a systematic review. Cancer Treat Rev. 2013 Nov;39(7):812-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2013.01.007. Epub 2013 Mar 6.

    PMID: 23473865BACKGROUND

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 21, 2017

First Posted

July 27, 2017

Study Start

July 21, 2017

Primary Completion

November 1, 2018

Study Completion

March 31, 2019

Last Updated

August 28, 2019

Record last verified: 2019-08

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations