Fixed Dose Spinal Bupivacaine for Cesarean Delivery
SpinFix-Bupi
Fixed Dose Versus Height - Adjusted Dose of Intrathecal Hyperbaric Bupivacaine With Opioid for Cesarean Delivery: a Prospective Double-blinded Randomized Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
140
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The study is designed to compare the effectiveness of spinal anesthesia performed with fixed dose of hyperbaric bupivacaine regardless of patient's height and weight and anesthesia with the dose of bupivacaine that is adjusted to their height. Our clinical experience shows that spinal anesthesia using specific, relatively high dose of hyperbaric bupivacaine combined with opioid is very effective, regardless of parturient's weight and height, provides very good surgical conditions and assures patient's comfort while the rate of anesthesia - related complications is similar or less. Therefore, using height-adjusted protocols, although preferred in some centres, might not be necessary in order to provide good anaesthesia for cesarean delivery. Fixed dose regimen may have some additional advantages in obstetric anesthesia settings, as many of cesareans are performed out of hours, giving less room for mistakes in less experienced hands. Two groups of parturients undergoing cesarean section are to be compared: anesthetized with fixed-dose regimen (intervention group) and anesthetized with height-adjusted dose regimen (control group). Patients are going to be randomized to one of the above groups, two anesthetists will be involved in anesthetic procedure: anesthetist that looks after the patient throughout the procedure will be blinded to the dose of anesthetic given intrathecally. Therefore his judgment of anesthetic effectiveness is not going to be biased and all patients will receive the same perioperative care in terms of fluid therapy, management of possible anesthesia - related complications and postoperative pain control. Rate of effective spinal anesthetics, defined as adequate block level and no need for additional intraoperative analgesia has been established as primary outcome measure. Secondary outcome measures are rate of complications and amount of opioids used postoperatively. These are going to be statistically compared.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jul 2017
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 24, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 24, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 27, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 3, 2019
CompletedJune 11, 2019
June 1, 2019
1.9 years
July 24, 2017
June 8, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Adequacy of spinal anesthesia
Level of surgical anesthesia at least T5 and no need for additional intraoperative analgesia
60min
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Number of complications
60min
Postoperative opioid consumption
24hours
Study Arms (2)
Fixed dose of 12.5mg bupivacaine
EXPERIMENTALParticipants that receive the same dose of intrathecal bupivacaine and 25mcg of fentanyl, regardless of their height.
Height-adjusted dose of bupivacaine
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants that receive the dose of intrathecal bupivacaine adjusted to their height and 25mcg of fentanyl
Interventions
Spinal anesthesia performed with 12,5mg of bupivacaine with 25mcg fentanyl for cesarean section
Spinal anesthesia performed with height-adjusted dose of bupivacaine with 25mcg fentanyl for cesarean section
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- singleton pregnancy above 37Hbd scheduled for elective cesarean section
- ASA 1 or 2
You may not qualify if:
- absolute contraindications to spinal anesthesia
- delivery in progress
- non-singleton pregnancy
- BMI\>35
- ultrasound - based estimation of fetal weight below 10 percentile
- pregnancy-induced hypertension
- more than 2 cesarean sections in patient's medical history
- significantly increased risk of obstetric hemorrhage (placenta previa)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Bartosz Horosz, MDlead
- Centre of Postgraduate Medical Educationcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education,Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care
Warsaw, 01-813, Poland
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Malgorzata Malec-Milewska, MD
Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 24, 2017
First Posted
July 27, 2017
Study Start
July 24, 2017
Primary Completion
June 1, 2019
Study Completion
June 3, 2019
Last Updated
June 11, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-06