NCT03230604

Brief Summary

To minimize the effects of polymerization shrinkage in the restorative treatment, there are new composites called Bulk- Fill which the companies has developed this composites for example Tetric N Ceram(Ivoclar-Vivadent) and Filtek ( 3M ESPE). Its decreased polymerization shrinkage and properties allow the material to be inserted in one layer being quickly than traditional composite. This clinical study is designed to compare the clinical performance of the bulk fill composite resin in Class I (one-surface posterior), II (two-surface posterior) and V (cervical-surface posterior) fillings.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
142

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2016

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 1, 2016

Completed
1.3 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 24, 2017

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 24, 2017

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 26, 2017

Completed
4.4 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2021

Completed
Last Updated

May 18, 2022

Status Verified

May 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

1.3 years

First QC Date

July 24, 2017

Last Update Submit

May 16, 2022

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Clinical performance restoration

    Outcome measure is Clinical performance of composite resin restoration, Device for measurement is FDI criteria , Unit is Ranking system has 5 scores for each different criterion. Either restoration is clinically excellent, or good, or sufficient, or unsatisfactory, or clinically poor.

    six month, one years, two, three, four and five years

Study Arms (2)

Bulk-Fill composite Class I, II and V cavities

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Restorative with Filtek Bulkfill composite in class I, II and V Restorative with Tetric N Ceram composite in class I, II and V

Device: Filtek Bulk Fill Composite and Tetric N Ceram Bulk Fill CompositeDevice: Z 350 Xt Composite

Z 350 xt Composite

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Restorative with Z 350 xt composite in class I, II and V

Device: Filtek Bulk Fill Composite and Tetric N Ceram Bulk Fill CompositeDevice: Z 350 Xt Composite

Interventions

Restorative cavities one, two and five with material Filtek Bulk Fill Composite

Bulk-Fill composite Class I, II and V cavitiesZ 350 xt Composite

Restorative cavities one, two and five with material Z 350 XT Composite

Bulk-Fill composite Class I, II and V cavitiesZ 350 xt Composite

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 60 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • must have given written informed consent to participate in the trial
  • need at least three posterior restorations
  • must be available for the required post-operative follow-up visits
  • have a buccal to lingual/palatal width no greater than 1/3 the distance from buccal to lingual/palatal cusp tips
  • At least one occlusal and proximal contact on a natural tooth
  • Cavities depth \> 2 mm in cervico-occlusal

You may not qualify if:

  • have severe medical complications (organ transplants, long term antibiotic or steroid treatment, cancer or immunocompromised) and disabilities who may not be able to tolerate the time required to complete the restorations
  • have xerostomia either by taking medications known to produce xerostomia or those with radiation induced or Sjogren's syndrome patients
  • chronic periodontitis
  • present with any systemic or local disorders that contra-indicate the dental procedures included in this study
  • an unstable occlusion
  • severe bruxing
  • teeth with periapical pathology or expected pulp exposures
  • are pregnant.
  • Endodontically treated teeth

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Patricio Vildosola Grez

Santiago, Santiago Metropolitan, 7510583, Chile

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Dental Caries

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Tooth DemineralizationTooth DiseasesStomatognathic Diseases

Study Officials

  • Odontologia

    Universidad Andres Bello

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Intervention: Bulk full composite (3M) bulk fill composite in posterior class one cavities bulk fill composite in posterior class two cavities bulk fill composite in posterior class five cavities Intervention:Bulk full composite (Ivoclar-Vivadent) bulk fill composite in posterior class one cavities bulk fill composite in posterior class two cavities bulk fill composite in posterior class five cavities Other: bulk fill composite Intervention Control: Nano resin composite (K Z350 xt) Restoration in class one cavities Restoration in class Two cavities Restoration in class five cavities
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Associate Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 24, 2017

First Posted

July 26, 2017

Study Start

April 1, 2016

Primary Completion

July 24, 2017

Study Completion

December 1, 2021

Last Updated

May 18, 2022

Record last verified: 2022-05

Locations