A Comparison of Video Laryngoscopes and the Direct Laryngoscope in Simulated Normal and Difficult Infant Airway.
Kivi
A Comparison of the Novel King Vision Pediatric aBlade and the C-MAC Video Laryngoscope to the Direct Laryngoscope in Simulated Normal and Difficult Infant Airway. A Bicentric, Prospective, Randomized Manikin Study
1 other identifier
interventional
80
1 country
1
Brief Summary
In Pediatric both manikin and human studies have suggested that the video laryngoscopy is equally suitable to facilitate intubation compared to the direct laryngoscopy.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jul 2017
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 23, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 24, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 26, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 31, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 27, 2017
CompletedOctober 2, 2017
September 1, 2017
7 days
July 23, 2017
September 28, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Time to ventilation (seconds)
Three timepoints will be recorded, beginning with the insertion of the device past the theeth/gum into the mouth. These will inlcude time to best view, time to removal of device from the mouth, and the time to the first chest raising of the simulator
Assessed intraoperatively at time of intubation (seconds)
Secondary Outcomes (4)
First attempt success rate of tracheal intubation (in 40 seconds)
Assessed intraoperatively at time of intubation
Grades of Laryngeal View (Cormack&Lehane Class)
Assessed intraoperatively at time of intubation
Use of ELM
Assessed intraoperatively at time of intubation
Intubation Adjustments & Ease of Use
Assessed intraoperatively following intubation
Study Arms (2)
normal airway
EXPERIMENTALTime (normal airway) using the novel King Vision™ Pediatric aBlade (KV) video laryngoscope, C-MAC™ D-blade Ped (DP), C-MAC™ Miller Blade (MB), shortened as VL, compared with conventional direct laryngoscopy (DL)
difficult airway
EXPERIMENTALTime (difficult airway) using the novel King Vision™ Pediatric aBlade (KV) video laryngoscope, C-MAC™ D-blade Ped (DP), C-MAC™ Miller Blade (MB), shortened as VL, compared with conventional direct laryngoscopy (DL)
Interventions
The Time interval between the laryngoscope blade passing the teeth/gums to the announcing of the first ventilation was recorded as the time to ventilation with the Video laryngoscopy (VL) or conventional direct laryngoscopy (DL)
The Time interval between the laryngoscope blade passing the teeth/gums to the announcing of the first ventilation was recorded as the time to ventilation with the Video laryngoscopy (VL) or conventional direct laryngoscopy (DL)
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- \- anesthesiologists or neonatal/pediatric intensive care medicice specialists with experience in securing pediatric airway
You may not qualify if:
- \- participants without experience in pediatric airway management
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Department of Anesthesiology,Prof. C. Werner, Universitätsmedizin of the JG University
Mainz, Rhineland-Palatinate, 55131, Germany
Related Publications (1)
Jagannathan N, Hajduk J, Sohn L, Huang A, Sawardekar A, Albers B, Bienia S, De Oliveira GS. Randomized equivalence trial of the King Vision aBlade videolaryngoscope with the Miller direct laryngoscope for routine tracheal intubation in children <2 yr of age. Br J Anaesth. 2017 Jun 1;118(6):932-937. doi: 10.1093/bja/aex073.
PMID: 28549081RESULT
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Marc Kriege, MD
University Medical Centre Mainz
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Masking Details
- residents, fellows and attending with different level of experience
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Dr. med. Marc Kriege, Dr. med. Nina Pirlich
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 23, 2017
First Posted
July 26, 2017
Study Start
July 24, 2017
Primary Completion
July 31, 2017
Study Completion
September 27, 2017
Last Updated
October 2, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share