NCT03230422

Brief Summary

In Pediatric both manikin and human studies have suggested that the video laryngoscopy is equally suitable to facilitate intubation compared to the direct laryngoscopy.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
80

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2017

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 23, 2017

Completed
1 day until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 24, 2017

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 26, 2017

Completed
5 days until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 31, 2017

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 27, 2017

Completed
Last Updated

October 2, 2017

Status Verified

September 1, 2017

Enrollment Period

7 days

First QC Date

July 23, 2017

Last Update Submit

September 28, 2017

Conditions

Keywords

infant, laryngoscopes, pediatrics

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Time to ventilation (seconds)

    Three timepoints will be recorded, beginning with the insertion of the device past the theeth/gum into the mouth. These will inlcude time to best view, time to removal of device from the mouth, and the time to the first chest raising of the simulator

    Assessed intraoperatively at time of intubation (seconds)

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • First attempt success rate of tracheal intubation (in 40 seconds)

    Assessed intraoperatively at time of intubation

  • Grades of Laryngeal View (Cormack&Lehane Class)

    Assessed intraoperatively at time of intubation

  • Use of ELM

    Assessed intraoperatively at time of intubation

  • Intubation Adjustments & Ease of Use

    Assessed intraoperatively following intubation

Study Arms (2)

normal airway

EXPERIMENTAL

Time (normal airway) using the novel King Vision™ Pediatric aBlade (KV) video laryngoscope, C-MAC™ D-blade Ped (DP), C-MAC™ Miller Blade (MB), shortened as VL, compared with conventional direct laryngoscopy (DL)

Device: normal airwayDevice: difficult airway

difficult airway

EXPERIMENTAL

Time (difficult airway) using the novel King Vision™ Pediatric aBlade (KV) video laryngoscope, C-MAC™ D-blade Ped (DP), C-MAC™ Miller Blade (MB), shortened as VL, compared with conventional direct laryngoscopy (DL)

Device: normal airwayDevice: difficult airway

Interventions

The Time interval between the laryngoscope blade passing the teeth/gums to the announcing of the first ventilation was recorded as the time to ventilation with the Video laryngoscopy (VL) or conventional direct laryngoscopy (DL)

difficult airwaynormal airway

The Time interval between the laryngoscope blade passing the teeth/gums to the announcing of the first ventilation was recorded as the time to ventilation with the Video laryngoscopy (VL) or conventional direct laryngoscopy (DL)

difficult airwaynormal airway

Eligibility Criteria

Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • \- anesthesiologists or neonatal/pediatric intensive care medicice specialists with experience in securing pediatric airway

You may not qualify if:

  • \- participants without experience in pediatric airway management

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Department of Anesthesiology,Prof. C. Werner, Universitätsmedizin of the JG University

Mainz, Rhineland-Palatinate, 55131, Germany

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Jagannathan N, Hajduk J, Sohn L, Huang A, Sawardekar A, Albers B, Bienia S, De Oliveira GS. Randomized equivalence trial of the King Vision aBlade videolaryngoscope with the Miller direct laryngoscope for routine tracheal intubation in children <2 yr of age. Br J Anaesth. 2017 Jun 1;118(6):932-937. doi: 10.1093/bja/aex073.

Study Officials

  • Marc Kriege, MD

    University Medical Centre Mainz

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Masking Details
residents, fellows and attending with different level of experience
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Dr. med. Marc Kriege, Dr. med. Nina Pirlich

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 23, 2017

First Posted

July 26, 2017

Study Start

July 24, 2017

Primary Completion

July 31, 2017

Study Completion

September 27, 2017

Last Updated

October 2, 2017

Record last verified: 2017-09

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations