Use of a Home-based PDG Urine Test to Confirm Ovulation
Use of a Home-based Urinary Pregnanediol 3-glucuronide (PDG) Test to Confirm Ovulation
1 other identifier
interventional
25
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Infertility affects many people in Ontario and carries a significant amount of emotional, physical and financial burden to those who experience it. Knowing when a woman ovulates is important for improving a couple's chance to become pregnant naturally and for learning about fertility problems, such as infertility, irregular menses, and hormonal disorders. Currently, there are two reliable methods to confirm ovulation: a trans-vaginal ultrasound or a blood test for progesterone, which is a hormone that only rises sharply after ovulation. However, both are time consuming and expensive. Recently, an inexpensive, home-based urine test strip has been developed to confirm ovulation. The test strip works by measuring urine for a marker of Progesterone, called pregnanediol-3a-glucuronide (PDG). The purpose of this feasibility study is to follow the use of this home-based PDG urinary test strip over the course of one menstrual cycle in 25 female participants. The results of the urine test strip will then be compared to a Progesterone blood test. Participants will be recruited from the general Ottawa, Ontario area The ultimate aim of this study is to provide information for the design of a larger study to determine the accuracy of the PDG urinary test strip. If shown to be as effective in confirming ovulation, this test would provide substantial cost saving to the Ontario health care system and a much more convenient way for women and clinicians to confirm ovulation and determine if women are fertile.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Aug 2017
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 24, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 26, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 23, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 14, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 14, 2018
CompletedMarch 20, 2018
July 1, 2017
7 months
July 24, 2017
March 19, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Sensitivity and specificity of the PDG urine test strip
The sensitivity will be estimated as the proportion of true positives cycles, that is, cycles with appropriate recognition of the post-ovulatory phase. The specificity will be estimated as the proportion of true negatives cycles, that is, cycles with appropriate recognition of the pre-ovulatory phase.
1 month
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Frequency of protocol violation
1 month
Frequency of positive responses versus negative responses about the study procedures
1 month
Frequency of positive responses versus negative responses on the study product
1 month
Study Arms (1)
Urine PDG test
EXPERIMENTALUrine pregnanediol 3-glucuronide (PDG) test strip
Interventions
Urine dipstick test that detects the presence of the urinary metabolite of progesterone, PDG.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Females aged 18 to 42 years
- Have had a menstrual cycle length of 25-35 days for the past 3 months
- Are able to provide informed consent
- Are willing to complete a trial diary
You may not qualify if:
- Have current or recent (in the past 6 months) use of any hormonal contraception (e.g. the Pill, Norplant, Depo Provera injections)
- Have current or recent (in the past 6 months) breastfeeding
- Have use of emergency contraception (e.g. the morning after pill or Plan B) in the past two menstrual cycles
- Cannot medically receive frequent blood tests, for example due to a blood clotting disorder
- Are pregnant at the time of enrollment to study
- Plan to donate blood during the study
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Bruyère Health Research Institute.lead
- Rene Leiva, MDcollaborator
- Bruyere Foundationcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Bruyere Research Institute
Ottawa, Ontario, K1N5C7, Canada
Related Publications (24)
Ecochard R, Leiva R, Bouchard T, Boehringer H, Direito A, Mariani A, Fehring R. Use of urinary pregnanediol 3-glucuronide to confirm ovulation. Steroids. 2013 Oct;78(10):1035-40. doi: 10.1016/j.steroids.2013.06.006. Epub 2013 Jul 4.
PMID: 23831784BACKGROUNDMesserlian C, Fishman JR. Less is more: improving outcomes and cutting costs to Quebec's assisted reproduction program. CMAJ. 2014 Apr 1;186(6):405-6. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.131672. Epub 2014 Mar 3. No abstract available.
PMID: 24591273BACKGROUNDBrown JB. Types of ovarian activity in women and their significance: the continuum (a reinterpretation of early findings). Hum Reprod Update. 2011 Mar-Apr;17(2):141-58. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmq040. Epub 2010 Oct 5.
PMID: 20923873BACKGROUNDVigil P, Ceric F, Cortes ME, Klaus H. Usefulness of monitoring fertility from menarche. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2006 Jun;19(3):173-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jpag.2006.02.003.
PMID: 16731410BACKGROUNDBushnik T, Cook JL, Yuzpe AA, Tough S, Collins J. Estimating the prevalence of infertility in Canada. Hum Reprod. 2012 Mar;27(3):738-46. doi: 10.1093/humrep/der465. Epub 2012 Jan 17.
PMID: 22258658BACKGROUNDGhavi F, Jamale S, Mosalanejad L, Mosallanezhad Z. A Study of Couple Burnout in Infertile Couples. Glob J Health Sci. 2015 Aug 6;8(4):158-65. doi: 10.5539/gjhs.v8n4p158.
PMID: 26573033BACKGROUNDEvans-Hoeker E, Pritchard DA, Long DL, Herring AH, Stanford JB, Steiner AZ. Cervical mucus monitoring prevalence and associated fecundability in women trying to conceive. Fertil Steril. 2013 Oct;100(4):1033-1038.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.06.002. Epub 2013 Jul 11.
PMID: 23850303BACKGROUNDRobinson JE, Wakelin M, Ellis JE. Increased pregnancy rate with use of the Clearblue Easy Fertility Monitor. Fertil Steril. 2007 Feb;87(2):329-34. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.05.054. Epub 2006 Oct 30.
PMID: 17074329BACKGROUNDLeiva R, Bouchard T, Boehringer H, Abulla S, Ecochard R. Random serum progesterone threshold to confirm ovulation. Steroids. 2015 Sep;101:125-9. doi: 10.1016/j.steroids.2015.06.013. Epub 2015 Jun 22.
PMID: 26111590BACKGROUNDPractice Committee of American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Diagnostic evaluation of the infertile female: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2012 Aug;98(2):302-7. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.05.032. Epub 2012 Jun 13.
PMID: 22698637BACKGROUNDPractice Committee of American Society for Reproductive Medicine in collaboration with Society for Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility. Optimizing natural fertility: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2013 Sep;100(3):631-7. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.07.011.
PMID: 23993665BACKGROUNDStanford JB. Revisiting the fertile window. Fertil Steril. 2015 May;103(5):1152-3. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.02.015. Epub 2015 Mar 13. No abstract available.
PMID: 25772771BACKGROUNDLeiva R, Burhan U, Kyrillos E, Fehring R, McLaren R, Dalzell C, Tanguay E. Use of ovulation predictor kits as adjuncts when using fertility awareness methods (FAMs): a pilot study. J Am Board Fam Med. 2014 May-Jun;27(3):427-9. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2014.03.130255.
PMID: 24808123BACKGROUNDEcochard R, Boehringer H, Rabilloud M, Marret H. Chronological aspects of ultrasonic, hormonal, and other indirect indices of ovulation. BJOG. 2001 Aug;108(8):822-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2001.00194.x.
PMID: 11510707BACKGROUNDEcochard R, Duterque O, Leiva R, Bouchard T, Vigil P. Self-identification of the clinical fertile window and the ovulation period. Fertil Steril. 2015 May;103(5):1319-25.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.01.031. Epub 2015 Feb 24.
PMID: 25724738BACKGROUNDBlackwell LF, Vigil P, Alliende ME, Brown S, Festin M, Cooke DG. Monitoring of ovarian activity by measurement of urinary excretion rates using the Ovarian Monitor, Part IV: the relationship of the pregnanediol glucuronide threshold to basal body temperature and cervical mucus as markers for the beginning of the post-ovulatory infertile period. Hum Reprod. 2016 Feb;31(2):445-53. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dev303. Epub 2015 Dec 17.
PMID: 26677961BACKGROUNDSauer MV, Paulson RJ. Utility and predictive value of a rapid measurement of urinary pregnanediol glucuronide by enzyme immunoassay in an infertility practice. Fertil Steril. 1991 Nov;56(5):823-6. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)54649-4.
PMID: 1936313BACKGROUNDDenari JH, Farinati Z, Casas PR, Oliva A. Determination of ovarian function using first morning urine steroid assays. Obstet Gynecol. 1981 Jul;58(1):5-9.
PMID: 7195531BACKGROUNDAdlercreutz H, Brown J, Collins W, Goebelsman U, Kellie A, Campbell H, Spieler J, Braissand G. The measurement of urinary steroid glucuronides as indices of the fertile period in women. World Health Organization, Task Force on Methods for the Determination of the Fertile Period, special programme of research, development and research training in human reproduction. J Steroid Biochem. 1982 Dec;17(6):695-702. doi: 10.1016/0022-4731(82)90573-8.
PMID: 7176659BACKGROUNDSauer MV, Paulson RJ, Chenette P, Frederick J, Stanczyk FZ. Effect of hydration on random levels of urinary pregnanediol glucuronide. Gynecol Endocrinol. 1990 Sep;4(3):145-9. doi: 10.3109/09513599009009801.
PMID: 2284979BACKGROUNDStirnemann JJ, Samson A, Bernard JP, Thalabard JC. Day-specific probabilities of conception in fertile cycles resulting in spontaneous pregnancies. Hum Reprod. 2013 Apr;28(4):1110-6. doi: 10.1093/humrep/des449. Epub 2013 Jan 22.
PMID: 23340057BACKGROUNDWesselink AK, Wise LA, Hatch EE, Rothman KJ, Mikkelsen EM, Stanford JB, McKinnon CJ, Mahalingaiah S. Menstrual cycle characteristics and fecundability in a North American preconception cohort. Ann Epidemiol. 2016 Jul;26(7):482-487.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2016.05.006. Epub 2016 May 31.
PMID: 27449569BACKGROUNDBigelow JL, Dunson DB, Stanford JB, Ecochard R, Gnoth C, Colombo B. Mucus observations in the fertile window: a better predictor of conception than timing of intercourse. Hum Reprod. 2004 Apr;19(4):889-92. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deh173. Epub 2004 Feb 27.
PMID: 14990542BACKGROUNDLeiva R, McNamara-Kilian M, Niezgoda H, Ecochard R, Bouchard T. Pilot observational prospective cohort study on the use of a novel home-based urinary pregnanediol 3-glucuronide (PDG) test to confirm ovulation when used as adjunct to fertility awareness methods (FAMs) stage 1. BMJ Open. 2019 May 27;9(5):e028496. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028496.
PMID: 31133596DERIVED
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Rene Leiva, MD
Bruyère Health Research Institute.
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DEVICE FEASIBILITY
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 24, 2017
First Posted
July 26, 2017
Study Start
August 23, 2017
Primary Completion
March 14, 2018
Study Completion
March 14, 2018
Last Updated
March 20, 2018
Record last verified: 2017-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share