NCT03230058

Brief Summary

OBJECTIVE To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the concurrent treatment of 5% Natamycin and 1% Voriconazole in patients affected by fungal keratitis METHODS AND MATERIALS STUDY POPULATION Patients with smear and or culture proven fungal keratitis presenting to our Instituts, were eligible for enrollment. STUDY DESIGN Prospective double masked randomized clinical trial.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
55

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for phase_2

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2017

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2017

Completed
7 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 23, 2017

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 26, 2017

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 1, 2018

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 30, 2018

Completed
Last Updated

July 26, 2017

Status Verified

July 1, 2017

Enrollment Period

1.2 years

First QC Date

July 23, 2017

Last Update Submit

July 23, 2017

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Success or failure

    Primary End point: Complete success: Complete resolution of the infiltrate with formation of a scar on medical treatment alone Partial success: Complete resolution of the infiltrate on medical treatment and use of cyanoacrylate glue and bandage contact lens Failure: Worsening of the ulcer necessitating therapeutic penetrating keratoplasty or evisceration

    8 weeks

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Best-corrected visual acuity

    8 weeks

Study Arms (2)

group 1

EXPERIMENTAL

Once the patient is randomized to either of the 2 groups using computer-generated randomization blocks, the hospital pharmacist would provide the appropriate medications. The treating ophthalmologist, microbiologist and patients will be masked to the drug by using similar vials. The experimental group (Group 1) will receive 1% voriconazole eye drop (Aurolab, Madurai, India) + 5% Natamycin ophthalmic suspension eye drop hourly (USP 5% Natamet, M.J. Pharmaceuticals, Mumbai, India). The subjects will be hospitalized for at least 4 days with medications given by the ward nurse. Patients will be followed up every week after being discharged until complete resolution is noted.

Drug: Group 1 Natamycin 5% Suspension + voriconazole 1% eye drops; Group 2 Natamycin 5% Suspension + Vehicle eye drops

group 2

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

Once the patient is randomized to either of the 2 groups using computer-generated randomization blocks, the hospital pharmacist would provide the appropriate medications. The treating ophthalmologist, microbiologist and patients will be masked to the drug by using similar vials. The placebo group (Group 2) will receive Vehicle eye drops + 5% Natamycin ophthalmic suspension every hour (USP 5% Natamet, M.J. Pharmaceuticals, Mumbai, India). The subjects will be hospitalized for at least 4 days with medications given by the ward nurse. Patients will be followed up every week after being discharged until complete resolution is noted.

Drug: Group 1 Natamycin 5% Suspension + voriconazole 1% eye drops; Group 2 Natamycin 5% Suspension + Vehicle eye drops

Interventions

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 90 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Subjects \> 18 yrs of age Willing to give appropriate informed consent Presence of corneal ulcer measuring \> 2mm in vertical and horizontal dimensions at presentation (epithelial defect and signs of stromal inflammation) Microbiologic evidence of fungus on smear and or culture media Willing to return for all the follow up visits

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients not willing to give consent Patients unable to cooperate for the procedure Patient with impending, or actual perforation or bilateral corneal ulcer or scleral involvement History of previous ocular surgery Evidence of bacterial, parasitic or viral infection or co-infection Previous corneal scar Known allergy to the study medication (drug or preservative) Pregnant or nursing females Immunocompromised patients

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

GMRV Campus LV Prasad Eye Insitute

Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, India

RECRUITING

Related Publications (3)

  • Sharma S, Das S, Virdi A, Fernandes M, Sahu SK, Kumar Koday N, Ali MH, Garg P, Motukupally SR. Re-appraisal of topical 1% voriconazole and 5% natamycin in the treatment of fungal keratitis in a randomised trial. Br J Ophthalmol. 2015 Sep;99(9):1190-5. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2014-306485. Epub 2015 Mar 4.

    PMID: 25740805BACKGROUND
  • Srinivasan M. Fungal keratitis. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2004 Aug;15(4):321-7. doi: 10.1097/00055735-200408000-00008.

  • Di Zazzo A, Surico PL, Parmar UPS, Tarini S, De Luca A, Madduri B, Mohan N, Fernandes M. Efficacy of natamycin monotherapy versus combination therapy with voriconazole for fungal keratitis: a randomised clinical trial. Br J Ophthalmol. 2025 Dec 9:bjo-2025-328695. doi: 10.1136/bjo-2025-328695. Online ahead of print.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Mycoses

Interventions

SuspensionsVoriconazoleOphthalmic Solutions

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Bacterial Infections and MycosesInfections

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

ColloidsComplex MixturesDosage FormsPharmaceutical PreparationsTriazolesAzolesHeterocyclic Compounds, 1-RingHeterocyclic CompoundsPharmaceutical SolutionsSolutionsTherapeutic UsesPharmacologic ActionsChemical Actions and UsesSpecialty Uses of Chemicals

Study Officials

  • merle fernandes, MS

    LVPEI

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Antonio Di Zazzo, MD

CONTACT

merle ferndnades, MS

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 2
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
MS

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 23, 2017

First Posted

July 26, 2017

Study Start

January 1, 2017

Primary Completion

March 1, 2018

Study Completion

September 30, 2018

Last Updated

July 26, 2017

Record last verified: 2017-07

Locations