Efficacy and Safety of the Ophthalmic Solution PRO-087 Versus Systane ® Ultra and Ultra Preservative Free (087LATAMFIV)
087LATAMFIV
1 other identifier
interventional
326
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Efficacy and Safety of the Ophthalmic Solution PRO-087 versus Systane ® Ultra and Systane ® Ultra Preservative Free on the Tear Film Dysfunction Syndrome from Mild to Moderate Clinical trial To evaluate the effectiveness of preservative-free ophthalmic formulation PRO-087 (by Laboratorios Sophia, S.A. de C.V.) to restore the anatomical and physiological characteristics of the ocular surface, as well as its distribution and the characteristics of the mild to moderate tear film dysfunction syndrome compared to Systane ® Ultra and Ultra Systane ® preservative free (by Laboratorios Alcon, S.A. de C.V.). Controlled, randomized, double-blind, masked clinical study, comparing the safety and efficacy of preservative-free PR0-087 vs Systane Ultra with preservative and Systane Ultra preservative free, in subjects with mild to moderate tear film dysfunction syndrome, for a period of 90 days plus 15 days of remote surveillance, in which one of the three agents will be administered (PR0-087, Systane® Ultra or Systane® Ultra preservative free) with a q.i.d. dosage. in both eyes, with regular follow-up visits (5 overall). Best-corrected visual acuity Intraocular pressure Ocular surface Anterior segment examination Posterior segment examination Tear film break-up time Schirmer test Corneal epithelization Goblet cells count Adverse events Subjects with a clinical diagnosis of mild to moderate tear film dysfunction syndrome between 18 and 90 years old, without concomitant eye diseases nor requiring different treatments of any of the three interventions in this study They will be randomized in 3 groups where PRO-087, Systane® Ultra o Systane® Ultra preservative free will be administered.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_4
Started Oct 2016
Typical duration for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 13, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 22, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 21, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 16, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 16, 2018
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
October 31, 2019
CompletedOctober 31, 2019
October 1, 2019
2 years
June 22, 2017
June 5, 2019
October 30, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Visual Acuity
Best-corrected visual acuity
Change from Baseline visual acuity at 90 days
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Corneal Epithelization Defects With Rose of Bengal
Final Visit (day 90)
Tear Film Break-up Time (TBUT)
Base line and Final Visit (day 90)
Schirmer Test
Base line and Final Visit (day 90)
Adverse Events
90 days
Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI)
Change from Baseline OSDI at 90 days
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
PRO-087 PF
EXPERIMENTALPreservative free (PF) PRO-087 ophthalmic solution. Dropper bottle. Multidose 1 drop every 4 hours for 90 days.
Systane Ultra
ACTIVE COMPARATORSystane Ultra ophthalmic solution, Dropper bottle, Multidose. 1 drop every 4 hours for 90 days.
Systane Ultra PF
ACTIVE COMPARATORSystane Ultra, preservative free ophthalmic solution, single-use vials. 1 drop every 4 hours for 90 days.
Interventions
0.1% sodium hyaluronate, free-preservative 0.18% chondroitin sulphate
Is a sterile solution containing polyethylene glycol 400, propylene glycol, hydroxypropyl-guar, sorbitol, aminomethylpropanol, boric acid, potassium chloride, sodium chloride and POLYQUAD® (poly-hydronium chloride) 0.001% as preservative.
Polyethylene Glycol 400 0.4%Lubricant, Propylene Glycol 0.3% Lubricant,
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- \>18 to \< 90 years old
- Both sexes
- Mild to moderate tear film dysfunction clinical diagnose
- Mild to moderate clinical stage of the disease
- TBUT \> 5 sec. and \< 10 sec.
- Schirmer: \> 4 mm and \< 14 mm
- OSDI \< 30 points
- Corneal staining \< grade III on the Oxford scale
- Availability to go to each revision when indicated.
You may not qualify if:
- General Criteria
- Subjects with topical and/or systemic medication or mechanical devices that interfere determinedly on the results of the study (such as topical immunomodulators, punctal plugs, corticosteroids, preservative artificial tears, contact lenses).
- Subjects (females) with active sexual life that do not use a contraceptive method.
- Female subjects who are pregnant or lactating
- Female subjects with a positive urine pregnancy test
- Positive drug addictions\* (verbal interrogatory)
- Subjects who have participated on any other research clinical trials on the last 40 days
- Subjects legal or mentally disabled to give an informed consent for participating on this study
- Subjects who can't comply with the appointments or with every protocol requirement.
- Criteria related with ophthalmic ailments
- Serious tear film dysfunction syndrome TBUT \< 5 s Schirmer: \< 4 mm OSDI \> 30 pints Corneal staining \> grade III on the Oxford scale
- Non perforated corneal ulcer
- Perforated corneal ulcer
- Autoimmune corneal ulcer
- Ocular surface scarring diseases
- +10 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Fernando Rodriguez Sixtos Higuera
Irapuato, Guanajuato, 36670, Mexico
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Ricardo Alonso Llamas Velázquez (clinical safety pharmacologist)
- Organization
- Laboratorios Sophia
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Leopoldo Baiza, MD
Laboratorios Sophia S.A de C.V.
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Masking Details
- The double-blind study is a procedure in which the patient and the treating doctor ignore to which intervention group the study patient was assigned. To achieve the blinding of both the drug in research and both comparator drugs, these will be labeled in the same way (masking). Besides the figure of an unblinded pharmacist, who is responsible for the delivery of the medication to the patient, will be added. Blinding codes are protected by an outsider appointed by the study sponsor. The codes are also available in the research center (fully sealed), so that they can be consulted by the investigator in case a subject presents a serious adverse event, prior authorization from the study sponsor; the blinding also continues rigorous during the data analysis and interpretation.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 22, 2017
First Posted
July 21, 2017
Study Start
October 13, 2016
Primary Completion
October 16, 2018
Study Completion
December 16, 2018
Last Updated
October 31, 2019
Results First Posted
October 31, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
For security and laws implemented by the regulatory entity can not share personal data of research subjects.