NCT03220659

Brief Summary

Recently, the introduction of quadripolar left ventricular leads (one with four pacing poles) has allowed the opportunity to pace the lateral (back) of the heart from several points at once using a single lead (multi-point pacing - MPP). Although it seems logical that electrical beginning at several points on the left ventricular wall should improve coordination of the heart, there is no consistent response in terms of improved remodeling (cardiac structure and function) or composite scores of patient-related status. The technology has a further disadvantage that it leads to accelerated battery drain, with on average one year less longevity over the lifetime of the device. Aims are:

  1. 1.to explore the effect of MPP on the force-frequency relationship,
  2. 2.to examine the effects of MPP on exercise capacity measured by treadmill walk time and whether these are related to the FFR response to MPP in individual patients,
  3. 3.establish whether the acute contractile response is maintained to 6 months after the implant procedure and
  4. 4.determine whether the acute contractile response to MPP is associated with subsequent beneficial remodeling over a further six months.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
23

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2017

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 11, 2017

Completed
7 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 18, 2017

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 1, 2017

Completed
2.9 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 1, 2020

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

November 1, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

November 5, 2020

Status Verified

November 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

2.9 years

First QC Date

July 11, 2017

Last Update Submit

November 4, 2020

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Force frequency curve (phase 1)

    Contractility curve over heart rate range

    Acute - cross-over phase at 6 weeks

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Quality of life (MLWHF)

    From 6 months to 12 months following implant

  • Quality of life (EQ5D-5L)

    From 6 months to 12 months following implant

  • Treadmill walk time (phase 2)

    From 6 months to 12 months following implant - chronic parallel group phase

  • Force frequency curve (phase 1)

    Acute - cross-over phase at 6 months

Other Outcomes (1)

  • Battery longevity after 6 months of MPP versus usual pacing

    From 6 months to 12 months following implant

Study Arms (2)

Standard settings

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

Usual pacing programming

Device: Standard settings

Multi-point pacing

EXPERIMENTAL

MPP programming

Device: Multi-point pacing

Interventions

Pacing from more than one pole from the left ventricular lead

Also known as: MPP
Multi-point pacing

Normal bipolar LV pacing

Also known as: CRT pacing
Standard settings

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Symptomatic heart failure due to left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVEF\<35%)
  • Due to (or just undergone) undergo CRT implantation
  • Able to perform a peak exercise test
  • Willing and able to give informed consent

You may not qualify if:

  • Atrial fibrillation
  • Angina pectoris symptoms limiting exercise tolerance
  • Unstable heart failure symptoms (medical therapy changes in last three months
  • Poor imaging quality such that analysis is unreliable
  • Calcium channel blockers (CCBs)

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Leeds General Infirmary

Leeds, United Kingdom

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Heart Failure, Systolic

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Heart FailureHeart DiseasesCardiovascular Diseases

Study Officials

  • Klaus Witte, MD

    University of Leeds

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Senior

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 11, 2017

First Posted

July 18, 2017

Study Start

November 1, 2017

Primary Completion

October 1, 2020

Study Completion

November 1, 2020

Last Updated

November 5, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-11

Locations