Protector™ Versus Supreme® Laryngeal Mask Airway
Prospective Randomised Trial of the Protector™ Versus the Supreme® Laryngeal Mask Airway
1 other identifier
interventional
96
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of this study is to compare the oropharyngeal leak pressure of the Protector Laryngeal mask with the Supreme laryngeal mask. Other secondary parameters will be studied.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jul 2017
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 28, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 11, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 12, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 28, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 28, 2017
CompletedDecember 2, 2017
November 1, 2017
5 months
June 28, 2017
November 30, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
OLP
oropharyngeal leak pressure
5 minutes
Secondary Outcomes (9)
insertion
5 minutes
time of insertion
5 minutes
Brimacombe score
5 minutes
respiratory pressure
5 minutes
suctioning catheter
5 minutes
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Protector group
ACTIVE COMPARATORAll patients collocated randomly to the Protector Group Primary and secondary outcome Parameters are studied
Supreme group
PLACEBO COMPARATORAll patients collocated randomly to the Supreme Group, Primary and secondary outcome Parameters are studied
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age between 18-75
- ASA 1-3
- Operation on limbs
- written informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- known difficult airway
- anatomical abnormalities on airway, Larynx, oesophagus, stomach
- not fastened
- high aspiration risk
- patients with contraindication of laryngeal mask
- BMI \>35 kg/m2
- patients with disease which impairs accurate Investigation of patient
- cardiovascular risk factors
- COPD
- acute disease where anaesthesia is in doubt
- no written consent
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Christian Keller
Zurich, 8008, Switzerland
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Berthold Moser, MD, MBA
Schulthess Klinik
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 28, 2017
First Posted
July 11, 2017
Study Start
July 12, 2017
Primary Completion
November 28, 2017
Study Completion
November 28, 2017
Last Updated
December 2, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share