Motivational Interviewing to Increase Physical Activity Behaviour in Cancer Patients
MIPAClux
1 other identifier
interventional
25
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Physical activity is not only efficient for primary prevention of several cancer types, but it also plays an important role in cancer survivors. Physical activity after a cancer diagnosis has been associated with reduced overall and cancer-specific mortality. It has significant positive effects on physical fitness and several cancer-related symptoms including fatigue, sleep disturbance, depression and anxiety. The evidence is considerable and consistent for breast, colorectal and endometrial cancers. However, patients are generally insufficiently active, and participation rates in physical activity opportunities offered by specialized organizations are low. This pilot study will evaluate the feasibility, efficacy and cost-effectiveness of an intervention seeking to increase active lifestyle and physical activity participation of cancer patients. To encourage this behavioural change, motivational interviewing will be used, a patient-centred approach aimed at increasing the patients' motivation for a behavioural change through open-ended discussions. Seventy patients with breast, colorectal or endometrial cancer will be recruited within a time period of 12 months. Patients will be randomly assigned to an intervention or a control group. The intervention group will receive standard care alongside 12 motivational interviewing sessions within 12 weeks. The control group will receive standard care only. Physical activity behaviour (3D-accelerometer) and physical fitness (cardiovascular and strength fitness) will be measured in the week preceding and following the intervention. Additionally, a subgroup from both study arms will be assessed 12 weeks after the completion of the intervention. The investigators hypothesize that sedentary time will decrease and time spent in moderate and vigorous physical activity, physical fitness and quality of life of cancer survivors will increase to a greater extent in the intervention group than in the control group. Furthermore, health-related quality of life and resource use (intervention and healthcare costs, out of pocket costs) will be measured to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of the intervention.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jul 2017
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 26, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 6, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 6, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 28, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 28, 2019
CompletedMarch 14, 2019
March 1, 2019
1.6 years
June 26, 2017
March 12, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in physical activity behavior
An objective measurement of the patients' physical activity behaviour will be conducted using the ActiGraph™ GT3X+, a validated 3D-accelerometer, which will be used together with the corresponding ActiLife 6™ data analysis software. Physical activity behaviour will be measured three times (week 1, week 14 and week 26). The main outcome is the change between week 1 and week 14.
week 1, week 14 and week 26
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Body mass index
week 1, week 14 and week 26
Ramped Bruce Protocol test
week 1, week 14 and week 26
30 seconds chair test
week 1, week 14 and week 26
Southampton protocol
week 1, week 14 and week 26
Cost-effectiveness of the intervention
week 1 (quality of life and cost questionnaires), week 4 (quality of life questionnaire), week 8 (quality of life questionnaire) week 14 (quality of life and cost questionnaires) and week 26 (quality of life and cost questionnaires)
Study Arms (2)
Motivational interviewing
EXPERIMENTALPatients of the motivational interviewing group will receive standard care alongside motivational interviewing to change their behavior regarding physical activity.
Control Group
NO INTERVENTIONPatients of the control group will receive standard care alone.
Interventions
the patients of the motivational interviewing group will receive 12 motivational interviewing sessions within 12 weeks: 2 face-to-face sessions and 10 phone call sessions. The first and the seventh motivational interviewing sessions will be face-to-face sessions. An intervention is considered valid if a minimum of 10 sessions has been completed. The face-to-face motivational interviewing sessions will be administered at the Luxembourg Institute of Health (Strassen, Luxembourg). They generally last up to 30 minutes, while the motivational interviewing phone calls generally last up to 15 minutes. Thereby, patients in the motivational interviewing group will receive a total of approximately 3.5 hours of contact time over a period of 12 weeks. Motivational interviewing techniques will explore self-assessed confidence, ambivalence, and personal values concerning changes in active lifestyle.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- breast, endometrial or colorectal cancer
- cancer stage ≤ stage III
- \> 3 months after primary treatment
- \< 24 months after primary treatment
- ECOG performance score \< 2
- Signed Informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- recurrent cancer
- history of other types of cancer
- second primary tumor
- planned surgery within the duration of the study
- known or obvious cognitive or psychiatric impairments
- positive pregnancy test
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Luxembourg Institute of Healthlead
- Fondation Cancercollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Luxembourg Institute for Health
Luxembourg, L-1460, Luxembourg
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Laurent Malisoux, PhD
Luxembourg Institute of Health
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Alexis Lion, PhD
Luxembourg Institute of Health
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Every patient will be given a person-specific code and every information collected will be pseudonymised. The group assignment will be hidden to the investigator and to the scientific collaborators who will collect, record and analyse the data. However, both patients and the two motivational interviewing counsellors will be aware of the group assignment.
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER GOV
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- PhD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 26, 2017
First Posted
July 6, 2017
Study Start
July 6, 2017
Primary Completion
February 28, 2019
Study Completion
February 28, 2019
Last Updated
March 14, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
The IPD will not be shared.