Study Stopped
The study aim was not relevant anymore because other studies became available recently on the same topic
Stress ECG Test for the Evaluation of the Risk of Sudden Cardiac Death in a Paediatric Cohort With WPW Pattern
Reproducibility and Validity of the Stress ECG Test for the Evaluation of the Risk of Sudden Cardiac Death in a Paediatric Cohort With Preexcitation (WPW Pattern)
1 other identifier
interventional
3
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Patients with preexcitation are at risk for sudden cardiac death. The pathogenesis is a rapid antegrade conduction of atrial fibrillation over the accessory pathway to the ventricle resulting in ventricular fibrillation. Today it is possible to eliminate the conduction over the accessory pathway by catheter intervention (radiofrequency ablation) with a low rate of complications and a high rate of success. In clinical practice it is therefore important to estimate the risk for sudden cardiac death in an individual patient to give an advice to the patient and the parents about the further evaluation and therapeutic strategy. The velocity of the conduction over the accessory pathway can be estimated by analysing the ECG during sinus tachycardia. If the preexcitation disappears at a relatively low heart rate, the risk for sudden death is less than in patients with persisting preexcitation at the maximal heart rate. Compared to the gold standard i.e. measurement of the refractory period of the accessory pathway during invasive electrophysiological study (EPS), the measurements at the stress ECG have been reported to be a relatively poor indicator for an elevated risk which may be explained by a high intraindividual variability of this test. This study is designed to define the clinical relevance of the stress ECG in paediatric patients with preexcitation (compared to the invasive electrophysiological study). First Hypothesis: The results of the 3 stress ECG-tests are reproducible in an individual patient. Null hypothesis: there is no difference between the three measurements of cycle length during stress ECG. Alternate hypothesis: the difference between the three measurements of cycle length is \> 10%. Second Hypothesis: There is a close correlation between the results at stress ECG and the results at the invasive electrophysiological Intervention.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2017
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 8, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 13, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 2, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 30, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 30, 2024
CompletedFebruary 1, 2024
January 1, 2024
6.8 years
March 8, 2017
January 30, 2024
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Cycle length (CL) at the Stress ECG Test
Cycle length (ms) at the point when the delta wave disappears and/or at the point of maximal heart rate (HR) (ms)
3 test within a month
Secondary Outcomes (3)
ERP-AP from invasive EPS
1 single measurement at aprox 1 month
SPERRI from invasive EPS
1 single measurement at aprox 1 month
Anatomical localisation of the AP measured in the EPS
1 single measurement at aprox 1 month
Other Outcomes (11)
Heart rate of 12-lead Resting ECG
1 single measurement within 1 month
Rhythm during 12-lead Resting ECG
1 single measurement within 1 month
axis of the QRS complex out of the 12-lead Resting ECG
1 single measurement within 1 month
- +8 more other outcomes
Study Arms (1)
Stress ECG Test
EXPERIMENTALThe whole study cohort undergoes the same diagnostic workup including stress test (ECG)
Interventions
Every study participant undergoes a standard diagnostic stress ECG
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Informed Consent as documented by signature (Appendix Informed Consent Form)
- Preexcitation in resting ECG (WPW ECG Pattern)
- Age between 8 and 18 years
- Invasive EPS must be indicated/planned at the Children's Hospital Zurich
You may not qualify if:
- Inability to follow the procedures of the study, e.g. due to language problems or psychological disorders of the participant
- Inability to walk/run on a treadmill
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Christian Balmerlead
Study Sites (1)
University Childrens Hospital
Zurich, 8090, Switzerland
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Christian Balmer, PD Dr. med.
University Childrens Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SCREENING
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Head of Electrophysiology, principal investigator, clinical lecturer
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 8, 2017
First Posted
July 2, 2017
Study Start
April 13, 2017
Primary Completion
January 30, 2024
Study Completion
January 30, 2024
Last Updated
February 1, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share