Comparison of Karyotyping, CMA and NIPT for Prenatal Diagnosing Chromosomal Anomalies
1 other identifier
observational
1,000
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This diagnostic test is aimed to compare the Karyotyping, CMA and NIPT for prenatal diagnosing chromosomal anomalies. Pregnant women who needed prenatal genetic diagnosis meted the study criterion; fetal amniotic fluid was regular examined by Karyotyping and CMA, and maternal peripheral blood was collected for NIPT detecting. And the CMA result as a golden standard, the main outcome is compared the diagnostic efficacy of NIPT for diagnosing chromosomal anomalies.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Jul 2016
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 26, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 28, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2017
CompletedJune 29, 2017
June 1, 2017
1 year
June 26, 2017
June 28, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
accuracy of NIPT for prenatal diagnosing chromosomal anomalies
sensitive, false negative rate, and false positive rate of NIPT compared with CMA
July,2016-July, 2017
Eligibility Criteria
pregnant women who needed amniocenteses were recruited during the study period
You may qualify if:
- pregnant women who needed amniocenteses were recruited during the study period, include high risk for serum screening, aged over 35 years and ultrasound abnormal.
- only singleton were included
You may not qualify if:
- women who met the contraindication for invasive procedure as : threaten abortion, acute infectious disease.
- Women who unfitted for NIPT analysis include multiple, history of allogeneic blood cell transfusion.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- YiYang Zhulead
Study Sites (1)
Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang province
Taizhou, Zhejiang, 317000, China
Biospecimen
Sample1.maternal peripheral blood,which used for extracted fetal free DNA for NIPT examination Sample2.amniotic fluid, which used for karyotyping and CMA analysis.
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
YiYang Zhu, MD
prenatal doagnosis center of taizhou city
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- OTHER
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Director,Clinical dean of Prenatal Diagnosis Center
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 26, 2017
First Posted
June 28, 2017
Study Start
July 1, 2016
Primary Completion
July 1, 2017
Study Completion
December 31, 2017
Last Updated
June 29, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share