An Equivalence Study of Generic Ingenol Mebutate Gel 0.015% and Picato Gel 0.015% in Subjects With Actinic Keratosis
A Multicenter Randomized Doubleblind Vehicle-controlled Parallel Comparison Study to Determine Therapeutic Equivalence of Generic Ingenol Mebutate Gel 0.015% and Picato® Gel 0.015% in Subjects With Actinic Keratosis on the Face or Scalp
1 other identifier
interventional
507
1 country
23
Brief Summary
The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety and therapeutic equivalence of generic ingenol mebutate gel, 0.015% to Picato gel, 0.015% by establishing the therapeutic comparability of the two active products and the superiority of the two active products over the vehicle gel in the treatment of AK on the face and scalp.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_3
Started Aug 2016
Shorter than P25 for phase_3
23 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 19, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 7, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 22, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 14, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 27, 2017
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
January 14, 2020
CompletedJanuary 14, 2020
January 1, 2020
7 months
June 14, 2017
November 26, 2019
January 13, 2020
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Complete Clearance of AK Lesions
Treatment success (complete clearance of AK lesions) at Day 57, where complete clearance of AK lesions was defined as having no (zero) clinically visible AK lesions in the Treatment Area
57 days
Study Arms (3)
Picato
ACTIVE COMPARATORPicato® (ingenol mebutate) gel, 0.15% (Leo Pharma Inc.) \[Reference Listed Drug (RLD)\]
Generic Ingenol Mebutate
EXPERIMENTALGeneric ingenol mebutate gel, 0.15% \[Test\]
Vehicle Foam
PLACEBO COMPARATORVehicle gel of the test product
Interventions
Generic formulated to have the same therapeutic effect of the brand
It does not contain active ingredient. A placebo to test the sensitivity of the active treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Subject was male or non-pregnant female 18 years of age or older.
- Females must have been post-menopausal, surgically sterile, or using an effective method of birth control. Women of childbearing potential (WOCBP) must have had a negative urine pregnancy test (UPT) at Visit 1/Baseline.
- Subject provided written informed consent.
- Subject had a clinical diagnosis of AK at Visit 1/Baseline with at least four, but no more than eight visible and discrete non-hyperkeratotic, non-hypertrophic AK lesions, each at least 4 mm in diameter, within a contiguous 25 cm2 treatment area ("the Treatment Area") located on the face or scalp.
- Subject was willing and able to apply the test article as directed, comply with study instructions, and commit to all follow-up visits for the duration of the study.
- Subject was in good general health and free of any disease state or physical condition that might have impaired evaluation of AK lesions or which, in the investigator's opinion, exposed the subject to an unacceptable risk by study participation.
You may not qualify if:
- \. Subject was pregnant, lactating, or was planning to become pregnant during the study.
- Subject had a location of the selected contiguous 25 cm2 Treatment Area that (a) was within 5 cm of an incompletely healed wound or (b) was in an area containing a lesion that was previously treated with ingenol mebutate.
- Subject had hyperkeratotic, hypertrophic, or large mat-like AKs (e.g., AK \>1 cm2 in size) within the contiguous 25 cm2 Treatment Area.
- Subject had more than eight AKs, independent of size, within the selected contiguous 25 cm2 Treatment Area
- Subject had atopic dermatitis, basal cell carcinoma, eczema, psoriasis, rosacea, squamous cell carcinoma, xeroderma pigmentosum, or any other possibly confounding skin conditions within the region of the head that contained the selected Treatment Area (i.e., face or scalp).
- Subject had any skin pathology or condition that, in the investigator's opinion, could have interfered with the evaluation of the test article or required the use of interfering topical, systemic, or surgical therapy.
- Subject was immunosuppressed (e.g., human immunodeficiency virus, systemic malignancy, graft host disease, etc.).
- Subject experienced an unsuccessful outcome from previous ingenol mebutate therapy (an unsuccessful outcome was defined as after a reasonable therapeutic trial with no compliance issues and the topical drug did not work).
- Subject used topical creams, lotions, or gels of any kind within the selected Treatment Area within one day prior to entry into the study.
- Subject had the need or planned to be exposed to artificial tanning devices or excessive sunlight during the study or had used artificial tanners within two weeks of Visit 1/Baseline.
- Subject had used any of the following topical medications on the face or scalp:
- Corticosteroids within two weeks of Visit 1/Baseline;
- Keratolytic-containing therapeutic products or medicated or irritant topical salves within two weeks of Visit 1/Baseline, including, but not limited to, alpha hydroxy acids (e.g., glycolic acid, lactic acid etc. \>5%), beta hydroxy acid (salicylic acid \>2%), and urea \>5%;
- Topical retinoids (e.g., tazarotene, adapalene, tretinoin) within two weeks of Visit 1/Baseline;
- Light treatments (e.g., psoralen plus ultraviolet A therapy, ultraviolet B) within four weeks of Visit 1/Baseline;
- +16 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Actavis Inc.lead
Study Sites (23)
Dermatology Specialists, Inc.
Oceanside, California, 92056, United States
Horizons Clinical Research Ctr., LLC
Denver, Colorado, 80220, United States
The Center for Clinical and Cosmetic Research
Aventura, Florida, 33180, United States
Moore Clinical Research
Brandon, Florida, 33511, United States
Savin Medical Group Research Center
Miami Lakes, Florida, 33014, United States
Tory P. Sullivan, M.D., P.A.
North Miami Beach, Florida, 33162, United States
MedaPhase, Inc.
Newnan, Georgia, 30263, United States
Northwest Clinical Trials, Inc.
Boise, Idaho, 83704, United States
Arlington Dermatology
Arlington Heights, Illinois, 60005, United States
Christie Clinic, LLC
Champaign, Illinois, 61820, United States
University Dermatology & Vein Clinic, LLC
Darien, Illinois, 60561, United States
Forefront Dermatology
Carmel, Indiana, 46032, United States
Dawes Fretzin Clinical Research Group, LLC
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46256, United States
The Indiana Clinical Trials Center
Plainfield, Indiana, 46168, United States
The South Bend Clinic,LLC
South Bend, Indiana, 46617, United States
Minnesota Clinical Study Center
Fridley, Minnesota, 55432, United States
MediSearch Clinical Trials
Saint Joseph, Missouri, 64506, United States
Academic Dermatology Associates
Albuquerque, New Mexico, 87106, United States
Dermatology Consulting Services
High Point, North Carolina, 27262, United States
Omega Medical Research, 400 Bald Hill Road, Warwick, RI 02886
Warwick, Rhode Island, 02886, United States
Palmetto Clinical Trial Services
Fountain Inn, South Carolina, 29644, United States
Dermatology Associates of Knoxville, PC
Knoxville, Tennessee, 37917, United States
DermReseach New Braunfels
New Braunfels, Texas, 78130, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Senior Director, CE Studies
- Organization
- Teva Pharmaceuticals Inc. USA
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Oleg Khatsenko, PhD
Actavis Inc.
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 14, 2017
First Posted
June 27, 2017
Study Start
August 19, 2016
Primary Completion
March 7, 2017
Study Completion
March 22, 2017
Last Updated
January 14, 2020
Results First Posted
January 14, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share