Educational Intervention in Increasing Knowledge About Prostate Cancer in High-Risk Neighborhoods
A Neighborhood-Based Intervention to Reduce Prostate Cancer Disparities
3 other identifiers
interventional
239
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This clinical trial studies how well an educational intervention works in increasing knowledge about prostate cancer in high-risk neighborhoods. Learning about prostate cancer and the pros and cons of screening for prostate cancer may increase knowledge about prostate cancer while decreasing anxiety and concerns about prostate cancer screening.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Sep 2016
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 29, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 22, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 23, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 20, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 20, 2018
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
March 25, 2026
CompletedMarch 25, 2026
March 1, 2026
1.8 years
June 22, 2017
December 7, 2020
March 24, 2026
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Change in Prostate Cancer Knowledge as Measured by the Decisional Conflict Scale
The Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS) measures uncertainty in health decision-making. It includes 16 items rated on a 5-point Likert scale. Scores are calculated by averaging item responses and multiplying by 25, yielding a range from 0 (no conflict) to 100 (high conflict). Lower scores indicate greater clarity, confidence, and satisfaction with the decision. Higher scores reflect uncertainty, lack of information/support, and low confidence. The self-efficacy subscale assesses confidence in decision-making with responses like "a lot confident," "a little confident," or "not at all confident."
4 months
Intent to Screen for PCa
Estimated mean changes from baseline assessment in likelihood of screening by study group from baseline to 4 month follow up. Intent to screen for prostate cancer was measured on a 5 point Likert Scale (1= very unlikely to 5=very likely). Results represent estimated mean change and 95% Confidence Interval from baseline in intent-to-screen score.
baseline to 4 months
Study Arms (2)
Group I (prostate cancer information)
EXPERIMENTALThe educator reviews general information about the prostate Cancer
Group II (general health information)
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe educator reviews topics about health promotion actions.
Interventions
Review prostate cancer information
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Focus groups consisting of men who live, work, or worship in the 4 predetermined neighborhoods
- Currently reside in one of the four selected high risk neighborhoods
You may not qualify if:
- Men who do not reside in one of the four neighborhoods, who self-report that they have previously been diagnosed with prostate cancer, or who have had prostate cancer screening (prostatic specific antigen \[PSA\] or digital rectal examination \[DRE\]) within the past 12 months
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19107, United States
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Charnita Ziegler Johnson
- Organization
- Thomas Jefferson University
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Charnita Zeigler-Johnson, MPH, PhD
Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 22, 2017
First Posted
June 23, 2017
Study Start
September 29, 2016
Primary Completion
July 20, 2018
Study Completion
July 20, 2018
Last Updated
March 25, 2026
Results First Posted
March 25, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-03