Study Stopped
Take care recommendations for Her2 equivok patients has changed.
Assessment of the Impact of RNA Genomic Profile on Treatment Decision-making in HER2 Equivocal Breast Cancer Patients
EQUIVOK
Prospective Study Assessing the Impact of RNA Genomic Profile Defined by a Genomic Test on Treatment Decision-making in Breast Cancer Patients With an ISH Equivocal HER2 Status- EQUIVOK Study
1 other identifier
interventional
26
1 country
16
Brief Summary
The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) and the /College of American Pathologists (CAP) recommend that HER2 status (negative or positive) must be determined in all patients with invasive breast cancer. The knowledge of HER2 status will help the oncologist in prescribing or not a HER2-targeted therapy to patients. Presently, two main methods are used to assess HER2 status: immunohistochemistry (IHC, protein expression) and in situ hybridization (ISH, gene expression) in order to classify tumor sample as positive, negative or equivocal. When a tumor is classified HER 2+ by IHC method, a second test is performed using ISH methods (FISH, SISH, CISH). In case of HER2 equivocal result with ISH method (4 ≤HER2 gene number copy \<6), the patient is eligible to an anti-HER2 therapy after discussed during MD-MM. This decision should be individualized on the basis of patient status (comorbidities and prognosis) and patient preferences after discussing available clinical evidence. Based on molecular classification, RNA expression could help to discriminate breast cancer subtypes (luminal A, luminal B, HER2-overexpressed and triple negative). Prosigna is a genomic test, developed by NanoString® based on the PAM50 gene signature, which measures the expression of 50 genes to classify tumors into 1 of 4 intrinsic subtypes and could allow determining the HER2 status. This study was designed in order to define if such a test could help the oncologist to define the better therapeutic decision in a HER2 equivocal population. In addition, concordance tests will be performed. The aim of this study is to assess the modification decision rate between the first and the second multidisciplinary decision-making meeting in HER2 equivocal patients using genomic testing.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable breast-cancer
Started Oct 2017
16 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 19, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 23, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 16, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 28, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 28, 2019
CompletedJuly 25, 2019
July 1, 2019
1.6 years
June 19, 2017
July 24, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The modification of therapeutical decision between the first and the second multidisciplinary decision-making meeting (MD-MM) using a genomic testing
Percentage of therapeutical strategy changes between the first and the second multidisciplinary decision-making meetings.
The measure will be realised after the second multidisciplinary decision-making meeting that is about one month after patient's inclusion.
Secondary Outcomes (2)
The HER2 overexpression incidence according to RNA genomic profile among equivocal-HER2 patients
The measure will be done when the genomic test is realised, that is about three weeks after patient's inclusion.
The concordance between the second multidisciplinary decision-making meeting decision and the HER2 genomic test result
The measure will be done when the genomic test is realised, that is about three weeks after patient's inclusion.
Other Outcomes (2)
To compare results from different ISH methods used
The measure will be done when the genomic test is realised, that is about three weeks after patient's inclusion..
The concordance between local and centralized anatomopathologist HER2 status
The measure will be done when the genomic test is realised,that is about three weeks after patient's inclusion.
Study Arms (1)
Use of PAM 50 test in Her2 equivocal breast cancer patient
EXPERIMENTALPatients with an equivocal-HER2 breast cancer (IHC Score 2 and equivocal ISH defined as HER2/Chr17 ratio \<2 and 4 ≤HER2 gene number copy \< 6) will be eligible for RNA genomic test (PAM 50 test).
Interventions
Patients with an equivocal-HER2 breast cancer (IHC Score 2 and equivocal ISH defined as HER2/Chr17 ratio \<2 and 4 ≤HER2 gene number copy \< 6) will be eligible for RNA genomic test (PAM 50 test). The use of genomic test could help the oncologist to define the better therapeutic decision in a HER2 equivocal population.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Performance status ≤ 2 (according to WHO criteria)
- Patient with early invasive breast cancer histologically confirmed stage I to IIIA)
- Positive or negative lymph node involvement
- Positive or negative Hormonal Receptors (Estrogens and/or Progesterone),
- Equivocal HER2 status (IHC Score 2 and equivocal ISH defined as HER2/Chr17 ratio \<2 and 4 ≤ HER2 gene number copy \< 6) as assessed on surgical specimen
- Adequate Hematological, Hepatic, Renal and Cardiac Functions
- Patient potentially eligible for an anti-HER2 therapy
- Patient eligible to receive an adjuvant therapy
- Signed Informed Consent
- Patient with social insurance.
You may not qualify if:
- Non-measurable tumor
- Unknown Hormonal Receptors
- Unknown node involvement
- Positive or negative HER2 status (Score 0, 1 or 3 IHC, or Negative or positive ISH)
- Disease stage ≥IIIB
- Patient not able to follow the trial.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Centre Jean Perrinlead
- Roche Pharma AGcollaborator
- NanoString Technologies, Inc.collaborator
Study Sites (16)
CHRU Jean Minoz
Besançon, 25030, France
Institut Bergonie
Bordeaux, 33076, France
Centre François Baclesse
Caen, 14000, France
Centre Jean Perrin
Clermont-Ferrand, 63000, France
Centre Georges François Leclerc
Dijon, 21079, France
CHU Albert Michalon
Grenoble, 38043, France
Hopital DUPUYTREN
Limoges, 87042, France
Centre Léon Bérard
Lyon, 69373, France
Institut Paoli Calmettes
Marseille, 13009, France
Institut de Cancérologie de Montpellier
Montpellier, 34298, France
Institut Jean Godinot
Reims, 51056, France
Institut du Cancer COURLANCY
Reims, 51100, France
Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest
Saint-Herblain, 44805, France
Centre Paul Strauss
Strasbourg, 67065, France
Institut Claudius Regaud
Toulouse, 31059, France
Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine
Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, 54519, France
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Marie-Ange MOURET-REYNIER, MD
Centre Jean Perrin
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 19, 2017
First Posted
June 23, 2017
Study Start
October 16, 2017
Primary Completion
May 28, 2019
Study Completion
May 28, 2019
Last Updated
July 25, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share