NCT03197805

Brief Summary

The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) and the /College of American Pathologists (CAP) recommend that HER2 status (negative or positive) must be determined in all patients with invasive breast cancer. The knowledge of HER2 status will help the oncologist in prescribing or not a HER2-targeted therapy to patients. Presently, two main methods are used to assess HER2 status: immunohistochemistry (IHC, protein expression) and in situ hybridization (ISH, gene expression) in order to classify tumor sample as positive, negative or equivocal. When a tumor is classified HER 2+ by IHC method, a second test is performed using ISH methods (FISH, SISH, CISH). In case of HER2 equivocal result with ISH method (4 ≤HER2 gene number copy \<6), the patient is eligible to an anti-HER2 therapy after discussed during MD-MM. This decision should be individualized on the basis of patient status (comorbidities and prognosis) and patient preferences after discussing available clinical evidence. Based on molecular classification, RNA expression could help to discriminate breast cancer subtypes (luminal A, luminal B, HER2-overexpressed and triple negative). Prosigna is a genomic test, developed by NanoString® based on the PAM50 gene signature, which measures the expression of 50 genes to classify tumors into 1 of 4 intrinsic subtypes and could allow determining the HER2 status. This study was designed in order to define if such a test could help the oncologist to define the better therapeutic decision in a HER2 equivocal population. In addition, concordance tests will be performed. The aim of this study is to assess the modification decision rate between the first and the second multidisciplinary decision-making meeting in HER2 equivocal patients using genomic testing.

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
26

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable breast-cancer

Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 2017

Geographic Reach
1 country

16 active sites

Status
terminated

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 19, 2017

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 23, 2017

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 16, 2017

Completed
1.6 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 28, 2019

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 28, 2019

Completed
Last Updated

July 25, 2019

Status Verified

July 1, 2019

Enrollment Period

1.6 years

First QC Date

June 19, 2017

Last Update Submit

July 24, 2019

Conditions

Keywords

Equivocal Her 2Genomic test

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • The modification of therapeutical decision between the first and the second multidisciplinary decision-making meeting (MD-MM) using a genomic testing

    Percentage of therapeutical strategy changes between the first and the second multidisciplinary decision-making meetings.

    The measure will be realised after the second multidisciplinary decision-making meeting that is about one month after patient's inclusion.

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • The HER2 overexpression incidence according to RNA genomic profile among equivocal-HER2 patients

    The measure will be done when the genomic test is realised, that is about three weeks after patient's inclusion.

  • The concordance between the second multidisciplinary decision-making meeting decision and the HER2 genomic test result

    The measure will be done when the genomic test is realised, that is about three weeks after patient's inclusion.

Other Outcomes (2)

  • To compare results from different ISH methods used

    The measure will be done when the genomic test is realised, that is about three weeks after patient's inclusion..

  • The concordance between local and centralized anatomopathologist HER2 status

    The measure will be done when the genomic test is realised,that is about three weeks after patient's inclusion.

Study Arms (1)

Use of PAM 50 test in Her2 equivocal breast cancer patient

EXPERIMENTAL

Patients with an equivocal-HER2 breast cancer (IHC Score 2 and equivocal ISH defined as HER2/Chr17 ratio \<2 and 4 ≤HER2 gene number copy \< 6) will be eligible for RNA genomic test (PAM 50 test).

Diagnostic Test: PAM 50 test

Interventions

PAM 50 testDIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Patients with an equivocal-HER2 breast cancer (IHC Score 2 and equivocal ISH defined as HER2/Chr17 ratio \<2 and 4 ≤HER2 gene number copy \< 6) will be eligible for RNA genomic test (PAM 50 test). The use of genomic test could help the oncologist to define the better therapeutic decision in a HER2 equivocal population.

Use of PAM 50 test in Her2 equivocal breast cancer patient

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Performance status ≤ 2 (according to WHO criteria)
  • Patient with early invasive breast cancer histologically confirmed stage I to IIIA)
  • Positive or negative lymph node involvement
  • Positive or negative Hormonal Receptors (Estrogens and/or Progesterone),
  • Equivocal HER2 status (IHC Score 2 and equivocal ISH defined as HER2/Chr17 ratio \<2 and 4 ≤ HER2 gene number copy \< 6) as assessed on surgical specimen
  • Adequate Hematological, Hepatic, Renal and Cardiac Functions
  • Patient potentially eligible for an anti-HER2 therapy
  • Patient eligible to receive an adjuvant therapy
  • Signed Informed Consent
  • Patient with social insurance.

You may not qualify if:

  • Non-measurable tumor
  • Unknown Hormonal Receptors
  • Unknown node involvement
  • Positive or negative HER2 status (Score 0, 1 or 3 IHC, or Negative or positive ISH)
  • Disease stage ≥IIIB
  • Patient not able to follow the trial.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (16)

CHRU Jean Minoz

Besançon, 25030, France

Location

Institut Bergonie

Bordeaux, 33076, France

Location

Centre François Baclesse

Caen, 14000, France

Location

Centre Jean Perrin

Clermont-Ferrand, 63000, France

Location

Centre Georges François Leclerc

Dijon, 21079, France

Location

CHU Albert Michalon

Grenoble, 38043, France

Location

Hopital DUPUYTREN

Limoges, 87042, France

Location

Centre Léon Bérard

Lyon, 69373, France

Location

Institut Paoli Calmettes

Marseille, 13009, France

Location

Institut de Cancérologie de Montpellier

Montpellier, 34298, France

Location

Institut Jean Godinot

Reims, 51056, France

Location

Institut du Cancer COURLANCY

Reims, 51100, France

Location

Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest

Saint-Herblain, 44805, France

Location

Centre Paul Strauss

Strasbourg, 67065, France

Location

Institut Claudius Regaud

Toulouse, 31059, France

Location

Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine

Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, 54519, France

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Breast Neoplasms

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Neoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsBreast DiseasesSkin DiseasesSkin and Connective Tissue Diseases

Study Officials

  • Marie-Ange MOURET-REYNIER, MD

    Centre Jean Perrin

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Model Details: Cohort longitudinal follow up
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 19, 2017

First Posted

June 23, 2017

Study Start

October 16, 2017

Primary Completion

May 28, 2019

Study Completion

May 28, 2019

Last Updated

July 25, 2019

Record last verified: 2019-07

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations