Ultrasound Assessment of Volume in Patients on Continuous Dialysis
1 other identifier
interventional
6
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Renal failure and resuscitation measures in critically ill patients can result in fluid overload. Fluid overload in renal failure patients can cause harmful effects like pulmonary edema, anasarca and congestive cardiac failure exacerbations among other complications. These have been associated with increased time on the ventilator, increased length of stay in the ICU, and higher overall mortality for patients requiring dialysis in the ICU. The current standard of care for adjusting fluid removal rates in patients on continuous renal replacement therapy relies on clinical judgement. Clinicians take into account factors like the patient's condition, vasopressor requirements, kidney function, total intake and outputs, vital signs, and physical examination findings when making daily changes to fluid removal rates on dialysis machines. Such assessment is highly subjective and can be imprecise/inaccurate leading to hypotension and hemodynamic instability in a critically ill patient. Use of conventional ultrasound by physicians to assess volume status using compressibility of the inferior vena cava has been shown to be a reliable predictor of volume status and can help guide therapy. Such use makes bedside volume assessment a non-invasive, rapid, repeatable point of care tool that can provide objective data to guide fluid removal determine velocity of fluid removal and help identify patients at risk of hypotension and hemodynamic instability during the process of fluid removal. Apart from rare possible local allergic reactions to ultrasound jelly and transient local discomfort, the disadvantages are minimal. Ultrasonography has been considered a safe imaging modality. This protocol will measure inferior vena cava compressibility using the General Electric VScan with Dual Probe, which has FDA approval for abdominal and vascular imaging in humans.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2016
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 13, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 21, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 7, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 7, 2023
CompletedSeptember 8, 2023
September 1, 2023
7.3 years
June 13, 2017
September 7, 2023
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Time to extubation
Length of time the participant is intubated from the start of the study up until the 30 day chart follow up.
Start of study to up to 30 days
Length of ICU stay
Length of time the participant remains in the ICU from the start of the study up until chart follow up at 30 days.
Start of study to up to 30 days
Length of hospital stay
Length of time the participant remains in the hospital up until the 30 day chart follow up.
Start of study to up to 30 days
30 day mortality
Start of study to day 30
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Difference in net fluid removal by CRRT at day 3
Start of study to day 3
Agreement between volume assessment and inferior vena cava collapsibility by level of training.
Start of study to day 3
Study Arms (2)
Share Data
EXPERIMENTALDo Not Share Data
ACTIVE COMPARATORInterventions
Nephrology attending will be provided with the respiratory variability of IVC diameter as a percent, in addition to a predefined cutoff for responsiveness to volume resuscitation of \< 12%. The information will be provided before rounds and before the attending sets the fluid removal goals on dialysis for that day.
Respiratory variability of IVC diameter will be measured, but the measurement result will not be shared with the treating team.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Acute kidney injury requiring initiation of continuous renal replacement therapy
- Respiratory failure requiring mechanical ventilation
You may not qualify if:
- cirrhosis of liver
- pregnant woman
- abdominal surgery interfering with placement of ultrasound probe
- end-stage kidney disease
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
UAB University Hospital
Birmingham, Alabama, 35294, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Eric Judd, MD
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 13, 2017
First Posted
June 21, 2017
Study Start
June 1, 2016
Primary Completion
September 7, 2023
Study Completion
September 7, 2023
Last Updated
September 8, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share