NCT03194698

Brief Summary

Dry eye disease (DED) is a common condition that causes ocular discomfort and reduces visual acuity. The two categories of DED are evaporative dry eye and aqueous deficient dry eye. Both conditions can involve pathology of the meibomian glands, lacrimal glands, lids, tear film and surface cells. Meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) is the leading cause of evaporative dry eye and contributes to aqueous deficient dry eye. The goal of MGD therapy is to provide long term improvement of symptoms for patients by improving the quality of meibum, increasing meibum flow, improving tear film stability and decreasing inflammation. Commonly used therapies include preservative free drops, omega-3 fatty acid supplementation, topical cyclosporine, serum tears, topical azithromycin, oral doxycycline, moisture chambers, intraductal probing, lib margin exfoliation, automated thermal pulsation, warm compresses, among other. Despite this variety of symptoms, patients often do not experience complete or long term relief of symptoms. Forced meibomian gland expression (MGX) has been shown to be an effective method of rehabilitating meibomian glands and improving dry eye symptoms. The eyelid margins are forcefully compressed to express gland contents. Research has shown improvement in patient symptoms with the use of MGX. Intense pulsed light (IPL) have been used in dermatology to treat various conditions. Patients with DED who have tried other therapies and found no relief, often resort to IPL as a last resort. Research has shown IPL alone may be effective in improving patient symptoms. In addition, such studies have failed to show significant adverse events with the use of IPL. Here, we propose a prospective, randomized, case controlled clinical pilot study to examine the efficacy for both subjective and objective measures. 20 patients with DED will be recruited and will be randomly assigned to one of two groups: MGX alone or MGX with IPL. Objective measures will include tear cytokine levels, impression cytology, meibography, tear osmolarity and others. Subjective measures will include quality of life screening tools. We hypothesize that the use of MGX with IPL will lead to greater improvement in subjective dry eye symptoms and objective measures. Given the lack of adverse effects reported in the literature, we do not anticipate adverse effects in our study. Rochester staff Drs. Faustch and Bourne are providing clinical research advice but have no contact with subjects or biospecimens.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
20

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Aug 2017

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 17, 2017

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 21, 2017

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 17, 2017

Completed
1.3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 6, 2018

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 6, 2018

Completed
1.1 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

January 3, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

January 3, 2020

Status Verified

December 1, 2019

Enrollment Period

1.3 years

First QC Date

June 17, 2017

Results QC Date

December 14, 2019

Last Update Submit

December 14, 2019

Conditions

Keywords

Intense Pulsed Light

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Change in Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) Symptom Survey Score

    Symptom survey on severity of dry eye symptoms. This 12-item questionnaire assesses dry eye symptoms and the effects it has on vision-related function in the past week of the patient's life. The questionnaire has 3 subscales: ocular symptoms, vision-related function, and environmental triggers. Patients rate their responses on a 0 to 4 scale with 0 corresponding to "none of the time" and 4 corresponding to "all of the time." A final score is calculated which ranges from 0 to 100 with scores 0 to 12 representing normal, 13 to 22 representing mild dry eye disease, 23 to 32 representing moderate dry eye disease, and greater than 33 representing severe dry eye disease.

    baseline, 3 months

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Change in Meibomian Glands Open - Right Lower Lid

    baseline, 3 months

  • Change in Meibomian Glands Open - Left Lower Lid

    3 months

Study Arms (2)

MGX and Intense Pulsed Light Treatment (IPL)

EXPERIMENTAL

Treatment with 4 visits and 4 treatments of IPL and Meibomian Gland Expression (MGX)

Device: Intense Pulsed Light Treatment (IPL)Procedure: Meibomian Gland Expression

Meibomian Gland Expression (MGX)

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Treatment with 4 visits and 4 treatments of MGX only

Procedure: Meibomian Gland Expression

Interventions

IPL is a high-intensity light source consisting of visible light in the wavelength range of 515-1200 nm, that is aimed at the eyes. Treatments are spaced four to six weeks apart for a total of 4 treatments.

MGX and Intense Pulsed Light Treatment (IPL)

Manual expression of the meibomian glands by placing the thumb against the lid margin and press firmly against the eyeball to determine the percentage of meibomian pores that are blocked. This assessment is performed on both the upper and lower lid of each eye.

MGX and Intense Pulsed Light Treatment (IPL)Meibomian Gland Expression (MGX)

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 100 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Dry eye of moderate severity with ocular rosacea diagnosed by ophthalmologist. No contraindications of severe ocular surface disease or inability to be safely treated with IPL. Dry eye symptoms must be alleviated with topical anesthetic. No GVHD, Stevens Johnson, active allergic conjunctivitis or other conjunctivitis, alkali burn history. Subjects must have at least 50% meibomian glands viable on meibography and no new treatments for dry eye in the past 6 months. Contact lenses and refractive surgery is okay.

Contact the study team to discuss eligibility requirements. They can help determine if this study is right for you.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Mayo Clinic in Arizona

Scottsdale, Arizona, 85259, United States

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Sagaser S, Butterfield R, Kosiorek H, Kusne Y, Maldonado J, Fautsch MP, Patel D, Shen JF. Effects of Intense Pulsed Light on Tear Film TGF-beta and Microbiome in Ocular Rosacea with Dry Eye. Clin Ophthalmol. 2021 Jan 27;15:323-330. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S280707. eCollection 2021.

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

RosaceaDry Eye Syndromes

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Skin DiseasesSkin and Connective Tissue DiseasesLacrimal Apparatus DiseasesEye Diseases

Results Point of Contact

Title
Joanne F. Shen, M.D.
Organization
Mayo Clinic

Study Officials

  • Joanne F Shen

    Mayo Clinic

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Chair, Department of Ophthalmology - Arizona

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 17, 2017

First Posted

June 21, 2017

Study Start

August 17, 2017

Primary Completion

December 6, 2018

Study Completion

December 6, 2018

Last Updated

January 3, 2020

Results First Posted

January 3, 2020

Record last verified: 2019-12

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations