Efficacy of IPL Treatment of Dry Eye and Ocular Rosacea
Pilot Study to Examine Efficacy and Cytokines Levels After Meibomian Gland Expression (MGX) With and Without Intense Pulsed Light Treatment (IPL)
1 other identifier
interventional
20
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Dry eye disease (DED) is a common condition that causes ocular discomfort and reduces visual acuity. The two categories of DED are evaporative dry eye and aqueous deficient dry eye. Both conditions can involve pathology of the meibomian glands, lacrimal glands, lids, tear film and surface cells. Meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) is the leading cause of evaporative dry eye and contributes to aqueous deficient dry eye. The goal of MGD therapy is to provide long term improvement of symptoms for patients by improving the quality of meibum, increasing meibum flow, improving tear film stability and decreasing inflammation. Commonly used therapies include preservative free drops, omega-3 fatty acid supplementation, topical cyclosporine, serum tears, topical azithromycin, oral doxycycline, moisture chambers, intraductal probing, lib margin exfoliation, automated thermal pulsation, warm compresses, among other. Despite this variety of symptoms, patients often do not experience complete or long term relief of symptoms. Forced meibomian gland expression (MGX) has been shown to be an effective method of rehabilitating meibomian glands and improving dry eye symptoms. The eyelid margins are forcefully compressed to express gland contents. Research has shown improvement in patient symptoms with the use of MGX. Intense pulsed light (IPL) have been used in dermatology to treat various conditions. Patients with DED who have tried other therapies and found no relief, often resort to IPL as a last resort. Research has shown IPL alone may be effective in improving patient symptoms. In addition, such studies have failed to show significant adverse events with the use of IPL. Here, we propose a prospective, randomized, case controlled clinical pilot study to examine the efficacy for both subjective and objective measures. 20 patients with DED will be recruited and will be randomly assigned to one of two groups: MGX alone or MGX with IPL. Objective measures will include tear cytokine levels, impression cytology, meibography, tear osmolarity and others. Subjective measures will include quality of life screening tools. We hypothesize that the use of MGX with IPL will lead to greater improvement in subjective dry eye symptoms and objective measures. Given the lack of adverse effects reported in the literature, we do not anticipate adverse effects in our study. Rochester staff Drs. Faustch and Bourne are providing clinical research advice but have no contact with subjects or biospecimens.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Aug 2017
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 17, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 21, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 17, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 6, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 6, 2018
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
January 3, 2020
CompletedJanuary 3, 2020
December 1, 2019
1.3 years
June 17, 2017
December 14, 2019
December 14, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) Symptom Survey Score
Symptom survey on severity of dry eye symptoms. This 12-item questionnaire assesses dry eye symptoms and the effects it has on vision-related function in the past week of the patient's life. The questionnaire has 3 subscales: ocular symptoms, vision-related function, and environmental triggers. Patients rate their responses on a 0 to 4 scale with 0 corresponding to "none of the time" and 4 corresponding to "all of the time." A final score is calculated which ranges from 0 to 100 with scores 0 to 12 representing normal, 13 to 22 representing mild dry eye disease, 23 to 32 representing moderate dry eye disease, and greater than 33 representing severe dry eye disease.
baseline, 3 months
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Change in Meibomian Glands Open - Right Lower Lid
baseline, 3 months
Change in Meibomian Glands Open - Left Lower Lid
3 months
Study Arms (2)
MGX and Intense Pulsed Light Treatment (IPL)
EXPERIMENTALTreatment with 4 visits and 4 treatments of IPL and Meibomian Gland Expression (MGX)
Meibomian Gland Expression (MGX)
ACTIVE COMPARATORTreatment with 4 visits and 4 treatments of MGX only
Interventions
IPL is a high-intensity light source consisting of visible light in the wavelength range of 515-1200 nm, that is aimed at the eyes. Treatments are spaced four to six weeks apart for a total of 4 treatments.
Manual expression of the meibomian glands by placing the thumb against the lid margin and press firmly against the eyeball to determine the percentage of meibomian pores that are blocked. This assessment is performed on both the upper and lower lid of each eye.
Eligibility Criteria
Contact the study team to discuss eligibility requirements. They can help determine if this study is right for you.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Mayo Cliniclead
Study Sites (1)
Mayo Clinic in Arizona
Scottsdale, Arizona, 85259, United States
Related Publications (1)
Sagaser S, Butterfield R, Kosiorek H, Kusne Y, Maldonado J, Fautsch MP, Patel D, Shen JF. Effects of Intense Pulsed Light on Tear Film TGF-beta and Microbiome in Ocular Rosacea with Dry Eye. Clin Ophthalmol. 2021 Jan 27;15:323-330. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S280707. eCollection 2021.
PMID: 33536740DERIVED
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Joanne F. Shen, M.D.
- Organization
- Mayo Clinic
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Joanne F Shen
Mayo Clinic
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Chair, Department of Ophthalmology - Arizona
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 17, 2017
First Posted
June 21, 2017
Study Start
August 17, 2017
Primary Completion
December 6, 2018
Study Completion
December 6, 2018
Last Updated
January 3, 2020
Results First Posted
January 3, 2020
Record last verified: 2019-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share