Standardization of Lead Placement for Sacral Neuromodulation. Part 1
Pelvic Floor EMG Monitoring as Tool to Improve Patient Selection and Outcome - Standardization of Lead Placement for Sacral Neuromodulation.
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Retrospective case-control study. A substantial number of patients do not respond favourably to sacral neurostimulation (SNS) although clinically, they appear to have the same lower urinary tract dysfunction characteristics as the ones with good responses. This may be due to methodological issues (lead position) or patient selection. The purpose of this study is to improve and standardize lead position, in order to increase the patient response to test stimulation and to SNS treatment, and to decrease adverse events.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2017
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 10, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 21, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2022
CompletedOctober 15, 2019
October 1, 2019
4.9 years
May 10, 2017
October 13, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
EMG activity of pelvic floor muscles in OAB patients and NOUR patients already on SNM
Latency and amplitude of pelvic floor measured by EMG probe
1 day
Study Arms (2)
OAB
EXPERIMENTALPatients with overactive bladder on sacral neuromodulation.
NOUR
EXPERIMENTALPatients with non-obstructive urinary retention on sacral neuromodulation.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Male or female aged ≥18 years and competent to provide consent
- Minimum 3 months of self-reported OAB symptoms or self-reported obstructive LUTS in addition to confirmed non-obstructive urinary retention on UDO
- Failed, or are not a candidate for more conservative treatment (i.e., pelvic floor training, biofeedback, behavioral modification, oral pharmacotherapy)
- Willing to discontinue OAB medications for 2 weeks prior to the implant and for the entire study period
- Able to thoroughly fill in all questionnaires, voiding diaries and office visits for device programming and clinical evaluations before the TLP, 3 weeks after TLP and 6 weeks, 6 months and 1 year after implantation of definitive IPG.
You may not qualify if:
- Current of prior evidence of primary stress incontinence or mixed incontinence where the stress component overrides the urgency component
- Any neurological condition that may interfere with normal bladder function, including stroke, multiple sclerosis, Parkinson's disease, clinically significant peripheral neuropathy, or spinal cord injury (e.g., paraplegia)
- Urinary tract mechanical obstruction including but not limited to Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH)
- Treatment of bladder or pelvic floor dysfunction with botulinum toxin (Botox ®) or surgery in past 12 months
- Unable to toilet self and have and maintain good personal hygiene
- Unable to provide clear, thoughtful responses to questions and questionnaires
- Urinary tract, bladder or vaginal infection or inflammation
- Hematuria, and absence of an elaborate diagnostic work-up
- Severe or uncontrolled diabetes (A1C \> 8, documented in the last 3 months) or diabetes with peripheral nerve involvement
- Allergy to local anesthetic or adhesives
- Bleeding disorder or on an anticoagulant that cannot be stopped for 3 days before the implant
- Pregnant, lactating, planning to become pregnant, given birth in the past 12 months, or female of child-bearing potential and not practicing a medically-approved method of birth control
- Skin lesions or compromised skin at the implant or stimulation site
- Use of investigational drug or device therapy or participation in any study involving or impacting gynecologic, urinary or renal function within past 4 weeks
- Passive implants (e.g., prostheses) are allowed, but no implanted metal should be at the Neurostimulator implant site
- +5 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Universiteit Antwerpenlead
- Leiden University Medical Centercollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Antwerp University Hospital
Edegem, Antwerp, 2650, Belgium
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Stefan De Wachter, MD PhD FEBU
University Hospital, Antwerp
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Donald Vaganée
University Hospital, Antwerp
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 10, 2017
First Posted
June 21, 2017
Study Start
September 1, 2017
Primary Completion
August 1, 2022
Study Completion
August 1, 2022
Last Updated
October 15, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share