Progressive Esophageal Dilation for Benign Strictures: a Randomized Controlled Trial
DILATE
Progressive Versus Conservative Dilation Strategy for Benign Esophageal Strictures: a Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
80
1 country
1
Brief Summary
A randomized controlled prospective clinical trial assessing the efficacy and safety of progressive esophageal dilation compared to conservative esophageal dilation in patients with severe benign esophageal strictures.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started May 2017
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 29, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 19, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2019
CompletedJune 19, 2017
May 1, 2017
1.5 years
May 29, 2017
June 15, 2017
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Total number of dilation procedures within 6 months of follow-up
Total number of dilation procedures within 6 months of follow-up
6 months
Total number of dilation procedures during first dilation session to 16-18mm
Total number of dilation procedures during first dilation session to 16-18mm
1 month
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Dysphagia free patients
6 months
Timeframe first dilation session
1 month
Dysphagia free time period
6 months
Incidence of treatment-related mortality (serious) adverse events (safety)
7 months
Quality of Life
6 months
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Progressive
EXPERIMENTALPatients will be dilated \> 3mm and can be dilated up to 6mm in diameter
Conservative (rule-of-3)
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients will be dilated according to the rule-of-3 (i.e. dilation of no more than 3mm in diameter)
Interventions
Patients will be dilated with the use of the Savary bougienage device
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Dysphagia due to benign esophageal stricture (e.g. surgery, radiation therapy, caustic ingestion, peptic injury, photodynamic therapy) requiring esophageal dilation
- Requiring first esophageal dilation for dysphagia due to a severe benign esophageal stricture with no patency for standard upper endoscope (9-10mm diameter)
- No history of esophageal endoscopic dilations for benign strictures the past 6 months
- Dysphagia for solid, semisolid or liquid food (dysphagia score ≥ 2 \[Ogilvie\]16, and dysphagia score ≤ 21 \[Dakkak and Bennett\]19, see appendix)
- Written informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Patient \< 18 years old
- Patient is unwilling or unable to sign and date the informed consent
- Patient is unwilling or unable to comply with the follow-up schedule
- Patient is unable to understand informed consent and fill in the questionnaires due to a language barrier
- Patient is pregnant, breast-feeding, or planning to become pregnant in the next 12 month
- Patient is simultaneously participating in another drug or device study or the patient has completed the follow-up phase for the primary objective of any previous study less than 30 days prior to enrollment in this study
- Previous esophageal dilation for benign stricture within the past 6 months
- Patient with a life expectancy \< 12 months
- Patient with a known eosinophilic esophagitis or motility disorder (such as achalasia)
- Patients with a known malignant esophageal stricture
- Patients with a benign stricture due to a previous performed laryngectomy
- Benign strictures in the upper part of the esophagus too close to the cricopharyngeal muscle (for the purpose of this protocol, within 1½ cm of the upper esophageal sphincter)
- Patients with stricture ≥ 10 cm in length
- Patients with an active esophageal perforation, leak, fistula, or varices
- Stricture within necrotic chronically bleeding tumors
- +4 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Radboudumc
Nijmegen, Gelderland, 6500HB, Netherlands
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Masking Details
- Participant will be blinded for dilation strategy.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 29, 2017
First Posted
June 19, 2017
Study Start
May 1, 2017
Primary Completion
November 1, 2018
Study Completion
May 1, 2019
Last Updated
June 19, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share