NCT03192098

Brief Summary

A randomized controlled prospective clinical trial assessing the efficacy and safety of progressive esophageal dilation compared to conservative esophageal dilation in patients with severe benign esophageal strictures.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
80

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2017

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 1, 2017

Completed
28 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 29, 2017

Completed
21 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 19, 2017

Completed
1.4 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 1, 2018

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 1, 2019

Completed
Last Updated

June 19, 2017

Status Verified

May 1, 2017

Enrollment Period

1.5 years

First QC Date

May 29, 2017

Last Update Submit

June 15, 2017

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Total number of dilation procedures within 6 months of follow-up

    Total number of dilation procedures within 6 months of follow-up

    6 months

  • Total number of dilation procedures during first dilation session to 16-18mm

    Total number of dilation procedures during first dilation session to 16-18mm

    1 month

Secondary Outcomes (6)

  • Dysphagia free patients

    6 months

  • Timeframe first dilation session

    1 month

  • Dysphagia free time period

    6 months

  • Incidence of treatment-related mortality (serious) adverse events (safety)

    7 months

  • Quality of Life

    6 months

  • +1 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Progressive

EXPERIMENTAL

Patients will be dilated \> 3mm and can be dilated up to 6mm in diameter

Device: Savary bougie dilation

Conservative (rule-of-3)

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Patients will be dilated according to the rule-of-3 (i.e. dilation of no more than 3mm in diameter)

Device: Savary bougie dilation

Interventions

Patients will be dilated with the use of the Savary bougienage device

Conservative (rule-of-3)Progressive

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Dysphagia due to benign esophageal stricture (e.g. surgery, radiation therapy, caustic ingestion, peptic injury, photodynamic therapy) requiring esophageal dilation
  • Requiring first esophageal dilation for dysphagia due to a severe benign esophageal stricture with no patency for standard upper endoscope (9-10mm diameter)
  • No history of esophageal endoscopic dilations for benign strictures the past 6 months
  • Dysphagia for solid, semisolid or liquid food (dysphagia score ≥ 2 \[Ogilvie\]16, and dysphagia score ≤ 21 \[Dakkak and Bennett\]19, see appendix)
  • Written informed consent

You may not qualify if:

  • Patient \< 18 years old
  • Patient is unwilling or unable to sign and date the informed consent
  • Patient is unwilling or unable to comply with the follow-up schedule
  • Patient is unable to understand informed consent and fill in the questionnaires due to a language barrier
  • Patient is pregnant, breast-feeding, or planning to become pregnant in the next 12 month
  • Patient is simultaneously participating in another drug or device study or the patient has completed the follow-up phase for the primary objective of any previous study less than 30 days prior to enrollment in this study
  • Previous esophageal dilation for benign stricture within the past 6 months
  • Patient with a life expectancy \< 12 months
  • Patient with a known eosinophilic esophagitis or motility disorder (such as achalasia)
  • Patients with a known malignant esophageal stricture
  • Patients with a benign stricture due to a previous performed laryngectomy
  • Benign strictures in the upper part of the esophagus too close to the cricopharyngeal muscle (for the purpose of this protocol, within 1½ cm of the upper esophageal sphincter)
  • Patients with stricture ≥ 10 cm in length
  • Patients with an active esophageal perforation, leak, fistula, or varices
  • Stricture within necrotic chronically bleeding tumors
  • +4 more criteria

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Radboudumc

Nijmegen, Gelderland, 6500HB, Netherlands

RECRUITING

Central Study Contacts

Bram Vermeulen, Drs.

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Masking Details
Participant will be blinded for dilation strategy.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: randomized controlled patient groups
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 29, 2017

First Posted

June 19, 2017

Study Start

May 1, 2017

Primary Completion

November 1, 2018

Study Completion

May 1, 2019

Last Updated

June 19, 2017

Record last verified: 2017-05

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations