The FAVOR II China Study
Functional Diagnostic Accuracy of Quantitative Flow Ratio in On-line Assessment of Coronary Stenosis (The FAVOR II China Study)
1 other identifier
observational
308
1 country
5
Brief Summary
Quantitative Flow Ratio (QFR) is a novel method for evaluating the functional significance of coronary stenosis. The purpose of the FAVOR II China study is to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of on-line QFR with FFR as the reference standard. The secondary purpose is to compare the diagnostic accuracies between online QFR and online QCA, with FFR as the reference standard.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Jun 2017
Shorter than P25 for all trials
5 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 13, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 16, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 19, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 20, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 20, 2017
CompletedJuly 26, 2017
July 1, 2017
1 month
June 16, 2017
July 25, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Diagnostic accuracy of online QFR to determine presence or absence of hemodynamically-significant coronary artery stenosis at the vessel level using binary outcomes when compared to FFR as the reference standard.
Presence of hemodynamically-significant coronary artery stenosis : FFR \<= 0.80.
1 hour
Secondary Outcomes (5)
In comparison to online 2D QCA, sensitivity and specificity of online QFR to determine presence or absence of hemodynamically-significant coronary artery stenosis at the vessel level using binary outcomes when compared to FFR as the reference standard
1 hour
The numerical difference between online QFR and core lab QFR.
1 hour
The numerical difference between online QFR and FFR.
1 hour
The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of online QFR in determining presence or absence of hemodynamically-significant coronary artery stenosis at the vessel level using binary outcomes when compared to FFR as the reference standard
1 hour
Feasibility of online computation of QFR
1 hour
Interventions
FFR measured by pressure wire, QFR computed by coronary angiographic images
Eligibility Criteria
Patients with coronary artery disease admitted for coronary angiography due to high risk of significant coronary stenosis
You may qualify if:
- General Criteria:
- Stable and unstable angina pectoris or secondary evaluation of stenosis after acute MI
- Age \> 18 years
- Able to provide signed informed consent
- At least one stenosis with diameter stenosis of 30%-90% by visual estimate
- Reference vessel size \> 2 mm in stenotic segment by visual estimate
You may not qualify if:
- General Criteria:
- Ineligible for diagnostic intervention or FFR examination
- Myocardial infarction within 72 hours
- Severe heart failure (NYHA≥III)
- S-creatinine\>150µmol/L or GFR\<45 ml/kg/1.73m2
- Allergy to contrast agent or adenosine
- Factors that might substantially impact the angiographic image quality, e.g, frequent atrial premature beat or atrial fibrillation
- The interrogated stenosis is caused by myocardial bridge
- Ostial lesions less than 3 mm to the aorta
- Side branches of the bifurcation lesions with Median Classification of 111 or 101
- Poor angiographic image quality precluding contour detection
- Severe overlap of stenotic segments
- Severe tortuosity of target vessel
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (5)
Fuwai Hospital
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
Chinese PLA General Hospital
Beijing, China
Peking University Third Hospital
Beijing, China
Guangdong General Hospital
Guangzhou, China
Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University
Shanghai, China
Related Publications (2)
Tu S, Westra J, Yang J, von Birgelen C, Ferrara A, Pellicano M, Nef H, Tebaldi M, Murasato Y, Lansky A, Barbato E, van der Heijden LC, Reiber JHC, Holm NR, Wijns W; FAVOR Pilot Trial Study Group. Diagnostic Accuracy of Fast Computational Approaches to Derive Fractional Flow Reserve From Diagnostic Coronary Angiography: The International Multicenter FAVOR Pilot Study. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Oct 10;9(19):2024-2035. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.07.013.
PMID: 27712739BACKGROUNDXu B, Tu S, Qiao S, Qu X, Chen Y, Yang J, Guo L, Sun Z, Li Z, Tian F, Fang W, Chen J, Li W, Guan C, Holm NR, Wijns W, Hu S. Diagnostic Accuracy of Angiography-Based Quantitative Flow Ratio Measurements for Online Assessment of Coronary Stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Dec 26;70(25):3077-3087. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.10.035. Epub 2017 Oct 31.
PMID: 29101020DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER GOV
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 16, 2017
First Posted
June 19, 2017
Study Start
June 13, 2017
Primary Completion
July 20, 2017
Study Completion
July 20, 2017
Last Updated
July 26, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-07