NCT03191708

Brief Summary

Quantitative Flow Ratio (QFR) is a novel method for evaluating the functional significance of coronary stenosis. The purpose of the FAVOR II China study is to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of on-line QFR with FFR as the reference standard. The secondary purpose is to compare the diagnostic accuracies between online QFR and online QCA, with FFR as the reference standard.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
308

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2017

Shorter than P25 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

5 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 13, 2017

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 16, 2017

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 19, 2017

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 20, 2017

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 20, 2017

Completed
Last Updated

July 26, 2017

Status Verified

July 1, 2017

Enrollment Period

1 month

First QC Date

June 16, 2017

Last Update Submit

July 25, 2017

Conditions

Keywords

Fractional Flow ReserveQuantitative Coronary AngiographyCoronary artery diseaseAngina pectorisQuantitative Flow Ratio

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Diagnostic accuracy of online QFR to determine presence or absence of hemodynamically-significant coronary artery stenosis at the vessel level using binary outcomes when compared to FFR as the reference standard.

    Presence of hemodynamically-significant coronary artery stenosis : FFR \<= 0.80.

    1 hour

Secondary Outcomes (5)

  • In comparison to online 2D QCA, sensitivity and specificity of online QFR to determine presence or absence of hemodynamically-significant coronary artery stenosis at the vessel level using binary outcomes when compared to FFR as the reference standard

    1 hour

  • The numerical difference between online QFR and core lab QFR.

    1 hour

  • The numerical difference between online QFR and FFR.

    1 hour

  • The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of online QFR in determining presence or absence of hemodynamically-significant coronary artery stenosis at the vessel level using binary outcomes when compared to FFR as the reference standard

    1 hour

  • Feasibility of online computation of QFR

    1 hour

Interventions

FFR measured by pressure wire, QFR computed by coronary angiographic images

Also known as: Quantitative Flow Ratio (QFR)

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Patients with coronary artery disease admitted for coronary angiography due to high risk of significant coronary stenosis

You may qualify if:

  • General Criteria:
  • Stable and unstable angina pectoris or secondary evaluation of stenosis after acute MI
  • Age \> 18 years
  • Able to provide signed informed consent
  • At least one stenosis with diameter stenosis of 30%-90% by visual estimate
  • Reference vessel size \> 2 mm in stenotic segment by visual estimate

You may not qualify if:

  • General Criteria:
  • Ineligible for diagnostic intervention or FFR examination
  • Myocardial infarction within 72 hours
  • Severe heart failure (NYHA≥III)
  • S-creatinine\>150µmol/L or GFR\<45 ml/kg/1.73m2
  • Allergy to contrast agent or adenosine
  • Factors that might substantially impact the angiographic image quality, e.g, frequent atrial premature beat or atrial fibrillation
  • The interrogated stenosis is caused by myocardial bridge
  • Ostial lesions less than 3 mm to the aorta
  • Side branches of the bifurcation lesions with Median Classification of 111 or 101
  • Poor angiographic image quality precluding contour detection
  • Severe overlap of stenotic segments
  • Severe tortuosity of target vessel

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (5)

Fuwai Hospital

Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China

Location

Chinese PLA General Hospital

Beijing, China

Location

Peking University Third Hospital

Beijing, China

Location

Guangdong General Hospital

Guangzhou, China

Location

Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University

Shanghai, China

Location

Related Publications (2)

  • Tu S, Westra J, Yang J, von Birgelen C, Ferrara A, Pellicano M, Nef H, Tebaldi M, Murasato Y, Lansky A, Barbato E, van der Heijden LC, Reiber JHC, Holm NR, Wijns W; FAVOR Pilot Trial Study Group. Diagnostic Accuracy of Fast Computational Approaches to Derive Fractional Flow Reserve From Diagnostic Coronary Angiography: The International Multicenter FAVOR Pilot Study. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Oct 10;9(19):2024-2035. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.07.013.

    PMID: 27712739BACKGROUND
  • Xu B, Tu S, Qiao S, Qu X, Chen Y, Yang J, Guo L, Sun Z, Li Z, Tian F, Fang W, Chen J, Li W, Guan C, Holm NR, Wijns W, Hu S. Diagnostic Accuracy of Angiography-Based Quantitative Flow Ratio Measurements for Online Assessment of Coronary Stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Dec 26;70(25):3077-3087. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.10.035. Epub 2017 Oct 31.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Coronary Artery DiseaseMyocardial IschemiaCardiovascular DiseasesArteriosclerosisCoronary DiseaseArterial Occlusive DiseasesHeart DiseasesVascular DiseasesAngina Pectoris

Interventions

Fractional Flow Reserve, Myocardial

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Chest PainPainNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Coronary CirculationBlood CirculationCardiovascular Physiological PhenomenaCirculatory and Respiratory Physiological Phenomena

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER GOV
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 16, 2017

First Posted

June 19, 2017

Study Start

June 13, 2017

Primary Completion

July 20, 2017

Study Completion

July 20, 2017

Last Updated

July 26, 2017

Record last verified: 2017-07

Locations