NCT03191552

Brief Summary

To evaluate the effects and feasibility of lycra based compression garment called Stabilizing Pressure Input Orthosis (SPIO) vest on posture and balance during sitting and gross manuel dexterity, parent satisfaction with the garment and to to compare 2 hours vs 6 hours of daily wear time.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
26

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2017

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 8, 2017

Completed
11 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 19, 2017

Completed
1 day until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 20, 2017

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 20, 2017

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 20, 2017

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

December 14, 2017

Completed
Last Updated

January 19, 2018

Status Verified

December 1, 2017

Enrollment Period

2 months

First QC Date

June 8, 2017

Results QC Date

August 9, 2017

Last Update Submit

December 19, 2017

Conditions

Keywords

Cerebral palsylycra garmentsorthosissuit therapytrunk control

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (4)

  • Sitting Assessment Scale

    Sitting Assessment Scale was devoloped for observational assessment of posture and balance during sitting after seating interventions. The scale consists of 5 items including head control, trunk control, foot control, arm function and hand function which are assessed as follows: 1= none; 2= poor; 3= fair; 4= good). The minimum and maximum possible scores are 5 to 20 respectively.

    Immediate after orthosis is worn

  • Sitting Assessment Scale

    Sitting Assessment Scale was devoloped for observational assessment of posture and balance during sitting after seating interventions. The scale consists of 5 items including head control, trunk control, foot control, arm function and hand function which are assessed as follows: 1= none; 2= poor; 3= fair; 4= good). The minimum and maximum possible scores are 5 to 20 respectively

    2 weeks

  • Sitting Assessment Scale

    Sitting Assessment Scale was devoloped for observational assessment of posture and balance during sitting after seating interventions. The scale consists of 5 items including head control, trunk control, foot control, arm function and hand function which are assessed as follows: 1= none; 2= poor; 3= fair; 4= good). The minimum and maximum possible scores are 5 to 20 respectively

    1 month

  • Sitting Assessment Scale

    Sitting Assessment Scale was devoloped for observational assessment of posture and balance during sitting after seating interventions. The scale consists of 5 items including head control, trunk control, foot control, arm function and hand function which are assessed as follows: 1= none; 2= poor; 3= fair; 4= good). The minimum and maximum possible scores are 5 to 20 respectively

    3 months

Secondary Outcomes (13)

  • Gross Motor Function Measure-B, Sitting Dimension

    2 weeks

  • Gross Motor Function Measure-B, Sitting Dimension

    1 month

  • Gross Motor Function Measure-B, Sitting Dimension

    3 months

  • Box and Block Test (BBT)

    Immediate after orthosis is worn

  • Box and Block Test (BBT)

    2 weeks

  • +8 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (3)

SPIO 2 hours

EXPERIMENTAL

All children will be hospitalized for 2 weeks and will receive conventional exercise therapy including range of motion, strengthening, trunk control and strengthening exercises and exercises to improve fine and gross motor skills during hospital inpatient stay throughout 2 weeks 2 hours a day. SPIO 2 hours group will receive conventional exercise therapy with the garment on for 2 hours.

Device: SPIOOther: conventional exercises

SPIO 6 hours

EXPERIMENTAL

SPIO 6 hours group will receive conventional exercise therapy with the garment on for 2 hours and worn SPIO 4 hours more in addition to 2 hour of wear during exercise therapy.

Device: SPIOOther: conventional exercises

Control(conventional exercises)

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Control group will only receive conventional exercise therapy (for two hours a day) including range of motion, strengthening, trunk control and strengthening exercises and exercises to improve fine and gross motor skills during hospital inpatient stay throughout 2 weeks

Other: conventional exercises

Interventions

SPIODEVICE

SPIO (stabilizing input pressure orthosis) 2 hours will receive conventional exercise therapy with the garment on during 2 hours. SPIO 6 hours group wore the SPIO 4 hours more in addition to 2 hours during therapy. SPIO 6 hours group will wear the SPIO 4 hours more in addition to 2 hours during therapy. (conventional exercises :range of motion, strengthening, trunk control and strengthening exercises and exercises to improve fine and gross motor skills

SPIO 2 hoursSPIO 6 hours

range of motion, strengthening, trunk control and strengthening exercises and exercises to improve fine and gross motor skills

Control(conventional exercises)SPIO 2 hoursSPIO 6 hours

Eligibility Criteria

Age3 Years - 12 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17)

You may qualify if:

  • being classified at Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) level III-IV
  • being classified at Manual Ability Classification System (MACS) level III-IV
  • being able to understand and execute given instructions for evaluations
  • parental acceptance of using the lycra based compression garment.

You may not qualify if:

  • serious respiratory restriction
  • having refractory cyanosis or circulatory disorder
  • having undergone lycra compression orthosis treatment programme previously
  • having undergone botulinum toxin injection within last 3 months or orthopedic surgery within 1 year
  • severe scoliosis (Cobb angle (CA) \>40°)
  • uncontrolled epilepsy
  • having intrathecal baclofen pump
  • having undergone selective dorsal rhizotomy
  • having reflux more than 3 times a week.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Marmara University School of Medicine Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

Istanbul, 34899, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

Related Publications (11)

  • Blair E, Ballantyne J, Horsman S, Chauvel P. A study of a dynamic proximal stability splint in the management of children with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1995 Jun;37(6):544-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.1995.tb12041.x.

  • How does the TherSuit® works? TheraSuit® / TheraSuit Method®. http://www.suittherapy.com/therasuit%20info.htm.

    RESULT
  • Hylton N, Schoos KK. Deep Pressure Sensory Input. SPIO Flexible Compression Bracing. http://www.spioworks.com/files/Deep%20Pressure%20Sensory%20Input%20Hylton%20Schoos.pdf; 2007.

    RESULT
  • Christy JB, Steed L. Commentary on "The effect of suit wear during an intensive therapy program in children with cerebral palsy". Pediatr Phys Ther. 2011 Summer;23(2):143. doi: 10.1097/PEP.0b013e318219352d. No abstract available.

  • Hylton N, Allen C. The development and use of SPIO Lycra compression bracing in children with neuromotor deficits. Pediatr Rehabil. 1997 Apr-Jun;1(2):109-16. doi: 10.3109/17518429709025853.

  • Knox V. The use of Lycra garments in children with cerebral palsy: A report of a descriptive clinical trial. The British Journal of Occupational Therapy 2003; 66: 71-7.

    RESULT
  • Matthews M, Crawford R. The use of dynamic Lycra orthosis in the treatment of scoliosis: a case study. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2006 Aug;30(2):174-81. doi: 10.1080/03093640600794668.

  • Saavedra S. Trunk control in cerebral palsy: are we ready to address the elephant in the room? Dev Med Child Neurol. 2015 Apr;57(4):309-10. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.12614. Epub 2014 Nov 20. No abstract available.

  • Myhr U, von Wendt L. Improvement of functional sitting position for children with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1991 Mar;33(3):246-56. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.1991.tb05114.x.

  • Myhr U, von Wendt L, Norrlin S, Radell U. Five-year follow-up of functional sitting position in children with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1995 Jul;37(7):587-96. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.1995.tb12047.x.

  • Giray E, Karadag-Saygi E, Ozsoy T, Gungor S, Kayhan O. The effects of vest type dynamic elastomeric fabric orthosis on sitting balance and gross manual dexterity in children with cerebral palsy: a single-blinded randomised controlled study. Disabil Rehabil. 2020 Feb;42(3):410-418. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2018.1501098. Epub 2018 Oct 7.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Cerebral Palsy

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Brain Damage, ChronicBrain DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System Diseases

Limitations and Caveats

Outcome measures assesses body structure and function only. Effects of orthosis on activity and participation were not evaluated

Results Point of Contact

Title
Esra Giray
Organization
Department of Physical medicine and Rehabilitation, Marmara University School of Medicine, Istanbul,Turkey

Study Officials

  • Esra Giray, MD

    Marmara University School of Medicine, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Naime Evrim Karadag-Saygi, Prof

    Marmara University School of Medicine, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

    STUDY CHAIR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Observational Model: Cohort Time Perspective: Prospective Randomized controlled trial
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 8, 2017

First Posted

June 19, 2017

Study Start

June 20, 2017

Primary Completion

August 20, 2017

Study Completion

September 20, 2017

Last Updated

January 19, 2018

Results First Posted

December 14, 2017

Record last verified: 2017-12

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations