NCT03191318

Brief Summary

The aim of this study is to compare two postoperative recovery pathways namely, enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway and conventional recovery pathway after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy with respect to outcomes including hospital stay, postoperative pain and other postoperative outcomes.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
60

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2017

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 15, 2017

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 19, 2017

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 1, 2017

Completed
10 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 1, 2018

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 1, 2018

Completed
Last Updated

October 23, 2018

Status Verified

October 1, 2018

Enrollment Period

10 months

First QC Date

June 15, 2017

Last Update Submit

October 20, 2018

Conditions

Keywords

ERASEnhanced recovery after sugery in bariatric surgerysleeve gastrectomy

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Hospital stay

    Postoperative hospital stay of patients

    7 days

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Pain score

    Within 72 hours of surgery

  • Operative time

    Within 24 hours, in minutes

  • Analgesic requirement

    Within 72 hours

  • Complication rate

    Within 30 days

Study Arms (2)

ERAS pathway

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy with ERAS pathway

Other: ERAS pathway

Standard pathway

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy with standard pathway

Other: Standard pathway

Interventions

ERAS pathway after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy

Also known as: Fast track pathway
ERAS pathway

Standard pathway after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy

Also known as: Coventional pathway
Standard pathway

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 65 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • All patients undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy during this study period

You may not qualify if:

  • \. Redo procedures 2. ASA III and above status 3. Previous major upper abdominal surgeries 4. Not willing to participate

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Gem Hospital and Research Centre

Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, 641045, India

Location

Related Publications (3)

  • Pimenta GP, Capellan DA, de Aguilar-Nascimento JE. Sleeve Gastrectomy With or Without a Multimodal Perioperative Care. A Randomized Pilot Study. Obes Surg. 2015 Sep;25(9):1639-46. doi: 10.1007/s11695-015-1573-2.

    PMID: 25670530BACKGROUND
  • Lemanu DP, Singh PP, Berridge K, Burr M, Birch C, Babor R, MacCormick AD, Arroll B, Hill AG. Randomized clinical trial of enhanced recovery versus standard care after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Br J Surg. 2013 Mar;100(4):482-9. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9026. Epub 2013 Jan 21.

    PMID: 23339040BACKGROUND
  • Prabhakaran S, Misra S, Magila M, Kumar SS, Kasthuri S, Palanivelu C, Raj PP. Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Outcomes of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery and Standard Recovery Pathways in Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy. Obes Surg. 2020 Sep;30(9):3273-3279. doi: 10.1007/s11695-020-04585-2.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Obesity, Morbid

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

ObesityOverweightOvernutritionNutrition DisordersNutritional and Metabolic DiseasesBody WeightSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • C Palanivelu, MS, MCh

    GEM Hospital & Research centre

    STUDY CHAIR
  • P Praveen Raj, MS, DNB

    GEM Hospital and Research centre

    STUDY DIRECTOR
  • M S Prabhakaran, DA

    GEM Hospital & Research centre

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Siddhartha Bhattacharya, MS, DNB, FNB

    GEM Hospital & Research centre

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 15, 2017

First Posted

June 19, 2017

Study Start

September 1, 2017

Primary Completion

July 1, 2018

Study Completion

August 1, 2018

Last Updated

October 23, 2018

Record last verified: 2018-10

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

It may be obtained by request

Locations