The Effect of On-line Hemodiafiltratrion on Nutritional Status and Body Composition
1 other identifier
interventional
33
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Compared to conventional hemodialysis (HD), on-line hemodiafiltration (OL-HDF) achieves a more efficient removal of uremic toxins and reduces inflammation, which could favourably affect nutritional status. The aim of this study was to evaluate the 1-year effect of OL-HDF on nutritional status and body composition in prevalent HD patients.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2012
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 31, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 31, 2013
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 13, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 19, 2017
CompletedJune 19, 2017
June 1, 2017
12 months
June 13, 2017
June 16, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Lean tissue mass in kilograms
Change from baseline to end of study in lean tissue mass in kilograms, measured quarterly throughout the 12-month intervention. Lean tissue mass was assessed by multi-frequency bioimpedance spectroscopy (Fresenius Medical Care) by experienced research staff blinded to all clinical and biochemical data of the patients. In order to control for potential variability and the effect of overhydration, all bioimpedance analyses were performed before a mid-week dialysis session.
Baseline, 4, 8, and 12 months.
Intracellular water in liters
Change from baseline to end of study in intracellular water in liters, measured quarterly throughout the 12-month intervention. Intracellular water was assessed by multi-frequency bioimpedance spectroscopy (Fresenius Medical Care) by experienced research staff blinded to all clinical and biochemical data of the patients. In order to control for potential variability and the effect of overhydration, all bioimpedance analyses were performed before a mid-week dialysis session.
Baseline, 4, 8, and 12 months.
Body cell mass in kilograms
Change from baseline to end of study in body cell mass in kilograms, measured quarterly throughout the 12-month intervention. Body cell mass was assessed by multi-frequency bioimpedance spectroscopy (Fresenius Medical Care) by experienced research staff blinded to all clinical and biochemical data of the patients. In order to control for potential variability and the effect of overhydration, all bioimpedance analyses were performed before a mid-week dialysis session.
Baseline, 4, 8, and 12 months.
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Serum prealbumin levels in milligrams per deciliter
Baseline, 4, 8, and 12 months.
Study Arms (2)
High-flux hemodialysis
ACTIVE COMPARATOR3 times per week
On line-hemodiafiltration
EXPERIMENTAL3 times per week
Interventions
Hemodialysis treatment thrice weekly with the high-flux FX-100 dialyzer (Fresenius Medical Care, Bad Homburg, Germany; membrane: Helixone®; surface: 2.2 m2; UF coefficient: 73 ml/h mm Hg; ß2-microglobulin-sieving coefficient: 0.8; albumin-sieving coefficient: 0.001), including a minimum target dialysis dose (Kt/Vurea) ≥1.2 and a session length of 3.0 to 6.0 h. Hemodialysis treatments were performed with the 5008 hemodialysis system (Fresenius Medical Care).
Post-dilution on line-hemodiafiltration treatment thrice weekly with the high-flux FX-100 dialyzer (Fresenius Medical Care, Bad Homburg, Germany; membrane: Helixone®; surface: 2.2 m2; UF coefficient: 73 ml/h mm Hg; ß2-microglobulin-sieving coefficient: 0.8; albumin-sieving coefficient: 0.001), including a minimum target dialysis dose (Kt/Vurea) ≥1.2 and a session length of 3.0 to 6.0 h. Post-dilution on line-hemodiafiltration treatments were performed with the 5008 hemodialysis system (Fresenius Medical Care), with automatic adjustment of the substitution fluid flow rate for maximising substitution volume while simultaneously avoiding haemoconcentration and filter clotting.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- being over 18 yr old; receiving stable high-flux hemodialysis treatment for at least 3 mo (Kt/Vurea ≥1.2 and hemodialysis performed 3.0 to 6.0 h, three times weekly), and agreed to give informed consent.
You may not qualify if:
- malabsorption syndrome; active malignant disease or other critical illnesses; or treated with steroids or antiandrogens.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Pablo Molinalead
Related Publications (5)
Gatti E, Ronco C. Seeking an optimal renal replacement therapy for the chronic kidney disease epidemic: the case for on-line hemodiafiltration. Contrib Nephrol. 2011;175:170-185. doi: 10.1159/000333636. Epub 2011 Dec 15.
PMID: 22188699BACKGROUNDCanaud B, Bowry SK. Emerging clinical evidence on online hemodiafiltration: does volume of ultrafiltration matter? Blood Purif. 2013;35(1-3):55-62. doi: 10.1159/000345175. Epub 2013 Jan 22.
PMID: 23343547BACKGROUNDFischbach M, Terzic J, Menouer S, Dheu C, Seuge L, Zalosczic A. Daily on line haemodiafiltration promotes catch-up growth in children on chronic dialysis. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2010 Mar;25(3):867-73. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfp565. Epub 2009 Nov 4.
PMID: 19889872BACKGROUNDMaduell F, Navarro V, Rius A, Torregrosa E, Sanchez JJ, Saborit ML, Ferrero JA. [Improvement of nutritional status in patients with short daily on-line hemodiafiltration]. Nefrologia. 2004;24(1):60-6. Spanish.
PMID: 15083959BACKGROUNDMolina P, Vizcaino B, Molina MD, Beltran S, Gonzalez-Moya M, Mora A, Castro-Alonso C, Kanter J, Avila AI, Gorriz JL, Estan N, Pallardo LM, Fouque D, Carrero JJ. The effect of high-volume online haemodiafiltration on nutritional status and body composition: the ProtEin Stores prEservaTion (PESET) study. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2018 Jul 1;33(7):1223-1235. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfx342.
PMID: 29370428DERIVED
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Pablo Molina, MD, PhD
Department of Nephrology, Hospital Universitari Dr Peset, Department of Medicine, Universitat de València, Spain
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 13, 2017
First Posted
June 19, 2017
Study Start
April 1, 2012
Primary Completion
March 31, 2013
Study Completion
March 31, 2013
Last Updated
June 19, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share