Study Stopped
departure of one of the investigator
Prevalence of Trephined Syndrome After Decompressive Craniectomy
TS
A Prospective Observational Study on Risk Factors of Developing and Prevalence of Trephined Syndrome in Patients After Hemispheric Decompressive Craniectomy and Effect of Cranioplasty on Functional and Cognitive Recovery
1 other identifier
observational
41
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Decompressive craniectomy is frequently used to treat increased intracranial pressure or an intracranial mass effect. Trephined Syndrome describes a neurological deterioration, which is attributed to a large craniectomy. The symptomatology is varied but includes headache, aggravation of a hemisyndrome or cognitive disorders, often has an orthostatic component and improves or disappears with cranioplasty. The incidence of Trephined Syndrome has been reported between 7% and 26%. However, it might be underestimated if the course of cognitive functions before and after cranioplasty were insufficiently documented.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for all trials
Started Jan 2012
Longer than P75 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 16, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 31, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 31, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 11, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 14, 2017
CompletedNovember 18, 2020
November 1, 2020
5.2 years
June 11, 2017
November 16, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Presence of Trephined Syndrome
To determine the incidence and severity of the the Trephined Syndrome in relation to delay to cranioplasty.
From patients admission to discharge from rehabilitation (approx. 3 months).
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Complications related to cranioplasty
From patients admission to discharge from rehabilitation (approx. 3 months).
Relation of delay to cranioplasty with neurological outcome
From patients admission to discharge from rehabilitation (approx. 3 months).
Relation of delay to cranioplasty with complications post-cranioplasty
From patients admission to discharge from rehabilitation (approx. 3 months).
Study Arms (1)
Decompressive craniectomy patients
All of the patients that undergo decompressive craniectomy due to intracranial mass lesion and are transferred to neuro-rehabilitation unit in our university hospital.
Interventions
Decompressive craniectomy is a surgical procedure used to treat patients with acute intractable intracranial hypertension. It includes removing a large portion of lateral skull wall in order to alleviate the effects of increased intracranial pressure and allow the brain to expand.
Cranioplasty is a routine neurosurgical procedure to repair the continuity of the bone tissue of the skull with autologous bone or synthetic bone flap from heterologous material.
Eligibility Criteria
Patients undergoing a decompressive craniectomy due to intracranial mass effect of non progressive origin and transferred to the neuro-rehabilitation unit of our hospital.
You may qualify if:
- Patients with decompressive craniectomy for intracranial hypertension secondary to stroke, traumatic brain injury or other non-progressive cerebral pathology.
You may not qualify if:
- patients suffering from a rapidly evolving cerebral pathology (e.g. tumor)
- patients transferred to other hospitals before cranioplasty or whose follow-up can not be assured.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Neuro-Rehabilitation Division, University Hospital of Geneva
Geneva, 1206, Switzerland
Related Publications (18)
Akins PT, Guppy KH. Sinking skin flaps, paradoxical herniation, and external brain tamponade: a review of decompressive craniectomy management. Neurocrit Care. 2008;9(2):269-76. doi: 10.1007/s12028-007-9033-z.
PMID: 18064408BACKGROUNDBeauchamp KM, Kashuk J, Moore EE, Bolles G, Rabb C, Seinfeld J, Szentirmai O, Sauaia A. Cranioplasty after postinjury decompressive craniectomy: is timing of the essence? J Trauma. 2010 Aug;69(2):270-4. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181e491c2.
PMID: 20699735BACKGROUNDBijlenga P, Zumofen D, Yilmaz H, Creisson E, de Tribolet N. Orthostatic mesodiencephalic dysfunction after decompressive craniectomy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2007 Apr;78(4):430-3. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2006.099242. Epub 2006 Nov 21.
PMID: 17119005BACKGROUNDChang V, Hartzfeld P, Langlois M, Mahmood A, Seyfried D. Outcomes of cranial repair after craniectomy. J Neurosurg. 2010 May;112(5):1120-4. doi: 10.3171/2009.6.JNS09133.
PMID: 19612971BACKGROUNDDujovny M, Agner C, Aviles A. Syndrome of the trephined: theory and facts. Crit Rev Neurosurg. 1999 Sep 24;9(5):271-278. doi: 10.1007/s003290050143.
PMID: 10525845BACKGROUNDFodstad H, Love JA, Ekstedt J, Friden H, Liliequist B. Effect of cranioplasty on cerebrospinal fluid hydrodynamics in patients with the syndrome of the trephined. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1984;70(1-2):21-30. doi: 10.1007/BF01406039.
PMID: 6741628BACKGROUNDHoneybul S. Complications of decompressive craniectomy for head injury. J Clin Neurosci. 2010 Apr;17(4):430-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2009.09.007. Epub 2010 Feb 23.
PMID: 20181482BACKGROUNDJoseph V, Reilly P. Syndrome of the trephined. J Neurosurg. 2009 Oct;111(4):650-2. doi: 10.3171/2009.3.JNS0984.
PMID: 19361266BACKGROUNDKemmling A, Duning T, Lemcke L, Niederstadt T, Minnerup J, Wersching H, Marziniak M. Case report of MR perfusion imaging in sinking skin flap syndrome: growing evidence for hemodynamic impairment. BMC Neurol. 2010 Sep 11;10:80. doi: 10.1186/1471-2377-10-80.
PMID: 20831824BACKGROUNDMokri B. Orthostatic headaches in the syndrome of the trephined: resolution following cranioplasty. Headache. 2010 Jul;50(7):1206-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2010.01715.x. Epub 2010 Jun 18.
PMID: 20561067BACKGROUNDNg D, Dan NG. Cranioplasty and the syndrome of the trephined. J Clin Neurosci. 1997 Jul;4(3):346-8. doi: 10.1016/s0967-5868(97)90103-x.
PMID: 18638981BACKGROUNDSarov M, Guichard JP, Chibarro S, Guettard E, Godin O, Yelnik A, George B, Bousser MG, Vahedi K; DECIMAL investigators. Sinking skin flap syndrome and paradoxical herniation after hemicraniectomy for malignant hemispheric infarction. Stroke. 2010 Mar;41(3):560-2. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.568543. Epub 2010 Jan 7.
PMID: 20056926BACKGROUNDSchiffer J, Gur R, Nisim U, Pollak L. Symptomatic patients after craniectomy. Surg Neurol. 1997 Mar;47(3):231-7. doi: 10.1016/s0090-3019(96)00376-x.
PMID: 9068692BACKGROUNDStiver SI. Complications of decompressive craniectomy for traumatic brain injury. Neurosurg Focus. 2009 Jun;26(6):E7. doi: 10.3171/2009.4.FOCUS0965.
PMID: 19485720BACKGROUNDStiver SI, Wintermark M, Manley GT. Reversible monoparesis following decompressive hemicraniectomy for traumatic brain injury. J Neurosurg. 2008 Aug;109(2):245-54. doi: 10.3171/JNS/2008/109/8/0245.
PMID: 18671636BACKGROUNDThavarajah D, De Lacy P, Hussien A, Sugar A. The minimum time for cranioplasty insertion from craniectomy is six months to reduce risk of infection--a case series of 82 patients. Br J Neurosurg. 2012 Feb;26(1):78-80. doi: 10.3109/02688697.2011.603850. Epub 2011 Oct 5.
PMID: 21973063BACKGROUNDYadla S, Campbell PG, Chitale R, Maltenfort MG, Jabbour P, Sharan AD. Effect of early surgery, material, and method of flap preservation on cranioplasty infections: a systematic review. Neurosurgery. 2011 Apr;68(4):1124-9; discussion 1130. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e31820a5470.
PMID: 21242830BACKGROUNDYang XF, Wen L, Shen F, Li G, Lou R, Liu WG, Zhan RY. Surgical complications secondary to decompressive craniectomy in patients with a head injury: a series of 108 consecutive cases. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2008 Dec;150(12):1241-7; discussion 1248. doi: 10.1007/s00701-008-0145-9. Epub 2008 Nov 13.
PMID: 19005615BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- medical doctor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 11, 2017
First Posted
June 14, 2017
Study Start
January 16, 2012
Primary Completion
March 31, 2017
Study Completion
March 31, 2017
Last Updated
November 18, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share