Oocyte Recipient's Decision in the Number of Embryos to be Transferred
Single or Double Embryo Transfer? Decision-making Process in Patients Participating in an Oocyte Donation Program
1 other identifier
interventional
100
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Multiple pregnancies are considered an ART complication. The only effective way to reduce its incidence is to transfer a single embryo. Nonetheless, there is some reluctance among the patients to accept this strategy. In IVF/ICSI programs, it has been demonstrated that, after receiving the information about the similar cumulative live birth rate after single embryo transfer (SET) and double embryo transfer (DET) and the obstetric and perinatal risks of multiple pregnancy, a significant number of patients opt for SET. Up to date, no comparable studies have been published in oocyte recipients. The aim of this study is to evaluate if the information given to the patients influence their preference on the number of embryos to be transferred. It also seeks to identify factors which determine the initial preference and factors which can explain a hypothetic change in this preference.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Oct 2014
Typical duration for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 19, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 14, 2017
CompletedJune 14, 2017
June 1, 2017
2.6 years
May 19, 2017
June 12, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Preference change on the number of embryos to be transferred
Preference was evaluated at the first consultation and after counselling using a self-report questionnaire.
Up to 3 months
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Factors which determine the initial preference on the number of embryos to be transferred
At the first consultation
Factors which can explain a change in the preference on the number of embryos to be transferred
Up to 3 months
Study Arms (1)
Counseling policy embryo transfer
OTHERAll recipients completed a validated self-report questionnaire on the preference on the number of embryos to be transferred and the relevance for the decision-making process attributed to certain factors. The questionnaire also included questions on sociodemographic characteristics, medical-reproductive background and cycle's results and risks perception. All recipients received oral and written counselling. After counselling, during the treatment, the recipients completed a second questionnaire in order to check if their decision had changed.
Interventions
Recipients were informed about success rates of SET and DET and also about the possible risks of DET. All the information was given orally and written.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients under their first oocyte or embryo donation cycle.
- Sufficient knowledge of Spanish to fill out questionnaires.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with a medical indication for single embryo transfer (e.g. Turner syndrome, uterine surgeries, cardiovascular risk).
- Having had previous oocyte or embryo donation cycles.
- Insufficient knowledge of Spanish.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Fundacion Dexeuslead
Related Publications (4)
Land JA, Evers JL. Risks and complications in assisted reproduction techniques: Report of an ESHRE consensus meeting. Hum Reprod. 2003 Feb;18(2):455-7. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deg081.
PMID: 12571190BACKGROUNDvan Peperstraten AM, Nelen WL, Hermens RP, Jansen L, Scheenjes E, Braat DD, Grol RP, Kremer JA. Why don't we perform elective single embryo transfer? A qualitative study among IVF patients and professionals. Hum Reprod. 2008 Sep;23(9):2036-42. doi: 10.1093/humrep/den156. Epub 2008 Jun 18.
PMID: 18565969BACKGROUNDRyan GL, Sparks AE, Sipe CS, Syrop CH, Dokras A, Van Voorhis BJ. A mandatory single blastocyst transfer policy with educational campaign in a United States IVF program reduces multiple gestation rates without sacrificing pregnancy rates. Fertil Steril. 2007 Aug;88(2):354-60. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.03.001. Epub 2007 May 9.
PMID: 17490657BACKGROUNDHope N, Rombauts L. Can an educational DVD improve the acceptability of elective single embryo transfer? A randomized controlled study. Fertil Steril. 2010 Jul;94(2):489-95. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.03.080. Epub 2009 May 13.
PMID: 19442970BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Elisabet Clua, PhD
Fundacion Dexeus
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- PhD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 19, 2017
First Posted
June 14, 2017
Study Start
October 1, 2014
Primary Completion
May 1, 2017
Study Completion
May 1, 2017
Last Updated
June 14, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share