Understanding Neonatal Jaundice in Rwanda
1 other identifier
interventional
46
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study exploits the distribution of low-cost high-quality phototherapy devices (Brilliance by D-Rev) to public hospitals in Rwanda to assess whether the provision of improved technology improves health care for infant jaundice. Specifically, the investigators are interested in measuring whether the provision of an additional high-quality phototherapy device, a known effective treatment for jaundice, successfully translates into improved care of neonatal jaundice in Rwanda where the burden of jaundice is particularly high.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started May 2017
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 29, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 5, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 14, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2018
CompletedApril 1, 2020
March 1, 2020
1 year
June 5, 2017
March 30, 2020
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Length of treatment for infant jaundice
Number of hours infant diagnosed with jaundice is provided phototherapy (PT). This is calculated by subtracting the age at which the patient is first given PT from the age at which the patient is removed from PT. The analysis is conditional on the subset of infants diagnosed with jaundice.
Through study completion, an average of 9 months
Length of hospital duration for infant jaundice
This is measured by the duration of stay at the facility, as measured by the time between being admitted and being discharged. The analysis is conditional on the subset of infants diagnosed with jaundice.
Through study completion, an average of 9 months
Secondary Outcomes (8)
Increased rate of reduction in bilirubin
Through study completion, an average of 9 months
Improved Treatment of Jaundice
Through study completion, an average of 9 months
Improved Treatment of Jaundice By Not Being Referred Elsewhere
Through study completion, an average of 9 months
Improved Treatment of Jaundice by Receiving Phototherapy
Through study completion, an average of 9 months
Improved Treatment of Jaundice by Not Sharing Phototherapy
Through study completion, an average of 9 months
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (7)
Age at time of jaundice diagnosis
Through study completion, an average of 9 months
Jaundice diagnosis rates
Through study completion, an average of 9 months
Jaundice diagnosis levels
Through study completion, an average of 9 months
- +4 more other outcomes
Study Arms (3)
Phase 1
ACTIVE COMPARATORThis is the first set of randomly selected hospitals to receive the intervention (Brilliance device). The intervention to be provided is the phototherapy device, Brilliance. \*No individual participants are recruited for this study.
Phase 2
ACTIVE COMPARATORThis is the second set of hospitals to receive the device. For the first three months, they receive no intervention, after which they become part of the "active comparator" arm. The intervention to be provided is the phototherapy device, Brilliance. \*No individual participants are recruited for this study.
Phase 3
NO INTERVENTIONThis is the last set of hospitals to receive the device. For the first six months, they receive no intervention, after which the study is completed and they are given the device Brilliance. \*No individual participants are recruited for this study.
Interventions
The intervention is the provision of the Brilliance phototherapy machines to hospitals. This device is to be provided to facilities regardless of the study -- the study's involvement has been to collaborate with the Ministry of Health so that Brilliance is distributed in a randomized staggered method. In that sense, the study may be considered observational, as the study is not driving whether or not a hospital receives Brilliance, only when it receives Brilliance in a short time frame.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- For patient level record (de-identified), diagnosed by the facility for having infant jaundice
- The facilities are included based on selection by the Ministry of Health for receiving additional phototherapy machines.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of California, Mercedlead
- Rwanda Pediatric Associationcollaborator
- Ministry of Health, Rwandacollaborator
- Rwanda Bio-Medical Centercollaborator
- Child Relief Internationalcollaborator
- D-Revcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
University Central Hospital of Kigali
Kigali, Rwanda
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ketki Sheth, PhD
University of California, Merced
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Lisine Tuysenge, MD
Rwanda Pediatric Association
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 5, 2017
First Posted
June 14, 2017
Study Start
May 29, 2017
Primary Completion
June 1, 2018
Study Completion
June 1, 2018
Last Updated
April 1, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-03