NCT03184181

Brief Summary

The supraspinatus muscle tendinopathy show a big impact, however, there is a lack of awareness about the options of the physiotherapist treatment. It is necessary to do studies about effectiveness of therapeutic percutaneous electrolysis (EPTE®). This technique enables treatment of the tendinopathies and the broken muscle fibrilare. It is base on the application of galvanic current through a acupuncture needle. To analyze the effectiveness of therapeutic percutaneous electrolysis (EPTE®) in the treatment of supraspinatus muscle tendinopathy. Single center randomized controlled trial, parallel treatment design. A specialist physician will be diagnosed the supraspinatus muscle tendinopathy. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive treatmen for 4 weeks: EPTE® associated with eccentric exercises or dry needling with the same eccentric exercises. Both interventions were performed under ultrasound guidance with a portable ultrasound (General Electric LogicE). Data will be collected by a blinded evaluator.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
32

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2017

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 6, 2017

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 12, 2017

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 1, 2017

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 1, 2018

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

February 1, 2018

Completed
Last Updated

May 10, 2023

Status Verified

May 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

2 months

First QC Date

June 6, 2017

Last Update Submit

May 8, 2023

Conditions

Keywords

tendinopathyelectrolysisexercisedry needling

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • The intensity of shoulder pain

    A 10-point Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS; 0: no pain, 10: maximum pain) will be used to assess the patients' current level of shoulder pain, and the worst and lowest level of pain experienced in the preceding week in the shoulder area. The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for the NPRS in patients with shoulder pain was 1.1 points (Mintken, Glynn, and Cleland 2009).

    Baseline

Secondary Outcomes (5)

  • The intensity of shoulder pain

    Four weeks

  • The intensity of shoulder pain

    Eight weeks

  • The intensity of shoulder pain

    One year

  • Active shoulder range of motion

    Baseline, four weeks and one year.

  • Pressure pain thresholds in supraspinatus trigger points

    Baseline, four weeks and one year.

Study Arms (2)

EPTE® group

EXPERIMENTAL

The intervention for this group consisted of Therapeutic Percutaneous Electrolysis (EPTE®). Patient received EPTE® once week for four weeks associated with eccentric exercises device at home.

Other: EPTE® group

Dry needling group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

The intervention for this group consisted of dry needling in trigger points associated with eccentric exercises device at home. Patient received 3 sessions of dry needling a week for four weeks.

Other: Dry needling group

Interventions

Therapeutic Percutaneous Electrolysis once week for four weeks associated with eccentric exercises devices at home.

Also known as: EPTE + EXER
EPTE® group

The intervention for this group consisted of dry needling in trigger points associated with eccentric exercises devices at home.

Also known as: DN + EXER
Dry needling group

Eligibility Criteria

Age25 Years - 60 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients diagnosed with supraspinatus tendinopathies that do not improve with conventional physiotherapy or pharmacological therapy protocols.
  • Subjects who are in an active state of pain, who present painful symptoms in a sensitive and painful area of the tendon of insertion of the supraspinatus muscle in the humerus.

You may not qualify if:

  • Individuals who have received surgery intervention in the same shoulder, or have suffered fractures or dislocations in the same shoulder.
  • Individuals have received the proposed treatment in one month´s period previously.
  • Individuals who suffering from cervical radiculopathies, fibromialgia síndrome, cardiac patients with pacemakers, cancer, infectious processes, or generalized lymphedema.
  • Pregnant women can not receive this treatment intervention.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Policlínica Santa María

Cadiz, Cádiz, 1108, Spain

Location

Related Publications (2)

  • Arias-Buria JL, Truyols-Dominguez S, Valero-Alcaide R, Salom-Moreno J, Atin-Arratibel MA, Fernandez-de-Las-Penas C. Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Electrolysis and Eccentric Exercises for Subacromial Pain Syndrome: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2015;2015:315219. doi: 10.1155/2015/315219. Epub 2015 Nov 15.

    PMID: 26649058BACKGROUND
  • Mintken PE, Glynn P, Cleland JA. Psychometric properties of the shortened disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Questionnaire (QuickDASH) and Numeric Pain Rating Scale in patients with shoulder pain. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2009 Nov-Dec;18(6):920-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2008.12.015. Epub 2009 Mar 17.

    PMID: 19297202BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

TendinopathyMotor Activity

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Muscular DiseasesMusculoskeletal DiseasesTendon InjuriesWounds and InjuriesBehavior

Study Officials

  • Manuel Manuel, BSc

    University of Cadiz

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: A specialist physician will be diagnosed the supraspinatus tendinopathy.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Degree Physiotherapy

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 6, 2017

First Posted

June 12, 2017

Study Start

November 1, 2017

Primary Completion

January 1, 2018

Study Completion

February 1, 2018

Last Updated

May 10, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-05

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations