Self Collected Sampling in Non-attendees Cervical Cancer Screening: DNA Test and Molecular Triage for HPV Positive Women
The Value of HPV DNA Testing Using Self-collected Sampling in Non Attendees Cervical Cancer Screening and Molecular Triage Strategies on Self-sampled Material for HPV Positive Women.
1 other identifier
interventional
8,000
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The aims of the present study are to assess the effects of a hrHPV self-sampling test as strategies to reach non-attending women in organized cervical screening in comparison with standard recall by letter in 8000 women; to evaluate the performance of two self sampling devices with and without a preservative buffer and to explore their acceptability among invited women and to evaluate a molecular triage approach for management of HPV positive women in self sampling collected material by HPV genotyping and DNA methylation marker panel
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Aug 2016
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 9, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 16, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 12, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 9, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 9, 2018
CompletedJuly 17, 2018
July 1, 2018
1 year
May 16, 2017
July 16, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
hrHPV self-sampling test
Effects of a hrHPV self-sampling test as strategies to reach non-attending women in organized cervical screening
14 months
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Evaluation of collection and storing performance of two self sampling devices
14 months
Other Outcomes (1)
Evaluation of the best triage strategy for self samples
14 months
Study Arms (3)
Control arm 1
OTHERThe women will receive the usual recall with a new invitation letter with a prefixed appointment.
Intervention arm 2
EXPERIMENTALDry one, where FloqSwab, with which perform the sampling is contained and will be preserved after sampling in a tube without preservation solutions
Intervention arm 3
EXPERIMENTALWet one in which, after sampling, the FloqSwab, will be dissolved in preservation solutions.
Interventions
The investigators will allocate randomly the women to two different self sampling devices differing in having or not a preservative buffer
Women are inviated with a standard invitation letter to perform cervical ThinPrep sampling at the clinic on a pre-fixed date
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Not responding to the previous screening round
You may not qualify if:
- Had any cervical smears taken for \< 3 years
- Pregnant
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Cancer Prevention and Research Institute, ISPO
Florence, FI, 50139, Italy
Related Publications (8)
Giorgi Rossi P, Marsili LM, Camilloni L, Iossa A, Lattanzi A, Sani C, Di Pierro C, Grazzini G, Angeloni C, Capparucci P, Pellegrini A, Schiboni ML, Sperati A, Confortini M, Bellanova C, D'Addetta A, Mania E, Visioli CB, Sereno E, Carozzi F; Self-Sampling Study Working Group. The effect of self-sampled HPV testing on participation to cervical cancer screening in Italy: a randomised controlled trial (ISRCTN96071600). Br J Cancer. 2011 Jan 18;104(2):248-54. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6606040. Epub 2010 Dec 21.
PMID: 21179038BACKGROUNDGok M, Heideman DA, van Kemenade FJ, Berkhof J, Rozendaal L, Spruyt JW, Voorhorst F, Belien JA, Babovic M, Snijders PJ, Meijer CJ. HPV testing on self collected cervicovaginal lavage specimens as screening method for women who do not attend cervical screening: cohort study. BMJ. 2010 Mar 11;340:c1040. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c1040.
PMID: 20223872BACKGROUNDGok M, van Kemenade FJ, Heideman DA, Berkhof J, Rozendaal L, Spruyt JW, Belien JA, Babovic M, Snijders PJ, Meijer CJ. Experience with high-risk human papillomavirus testing on vaginal brush-based self-samples of non-attendees of the cervical screening program. Int J Cancer. 2012 Mar 1;130(5):1128-35. doi: 10.1002/ijc.26128. Epub 2011 May 30.
PMID: 21484793BACKGROUNDHesselink AT, Heideman DA, Steenbergen RD, Coupe VM, Overmeer RM, Rijkaart D, Berkhof J, Meijer CJ, Snijders PJ. Combined promoter methylation analysis of CADM1 and MAL: an objective triage tool for high-risk human papillomavirus DNA-positive women. Clin Cancer Res. 2011 Apr 15;17(8):2459-65. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-2548. Epub 2011 Mar 9.
PMID: 21389098BACKGROUNDHolanda F Jr, Castelo A, Veras TM, de Almeida FM, Lins MZ, Dores GB. Primary screening for cervical cancer through self sampling. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2006 Nov;95(2):179-84. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2006.07.012. Epub 2006 Sep 25.
PMID: 16997304BACKGROUNDIgidbashian S, Boveri S, Spolti N, Radice D, Sandri MT, Sideri M. Self-collected human papillomavirus testing acceptability: comparison of two self-sampling modalities. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2011 Mar;20(3):397-402. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2010.2189. Epub 2011 Feb 25.
PMID: 21351869BACKGROUNDKhanna N, Mishra SI, Tian G, Tan MT, Arnold S, Lee C, Ramachandran S, Bell L, Baquet CR, Lorincz A. Human papillomavirus detection in self-collected vaginal specimens and matched clinician-collected cervical specimens. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2007 May-Jun;17(3):615-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1438.2006.00835.x.
PMID: 17504376BACKGROUNDLazcano-Ponce E, Lorincz AT, Cruz-Valdez A, Salmeron J, Uribe P, Velasco-Mondragon E, Nevarez PH, Acosta RD, Hernandez-Avila M. Self-collection of vaginal specimens for human papillomavirus testing in cervical cancer prevention (MARCH): a community-based randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2011 Nov 26;378(9806):1868-73. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61522-5. Epub 2011 Nov 1.
PMID: 22051739BACKGROUND
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Francesca M Carozzi, PhD
Cancer prevention and Research Institute
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- SCREENING
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Biologist Director
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 16, 2017
First Posted
June 12, 2017
Study Start
August 9, 2016
Primary Completion
August 9, 2017
Study Completion
August 9, 2018
Last Updated
July 17, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-07