MEND 2: Making Treatment Decisions Using Genomic Testing
MEND2
1 other identifier
interventional
88
1 country
2
Brief Summary
Clinical guidelines for women with early stage breast cancer integrate genomic tumor profiling tests such as the Oncotype DX Recurrence Score to refine recurrence estimates and systemic therapy selection when combined with existing markers. Guidelines suggest that the 25% with a high Score benefit from chemotherapy and the 50% with a low Score can safely avoid chemotherapy. Many challenges remain to maximize the benefits of testing prior to release of trial results in the next year. Strong clinical communication can impact proximal outcomes of patient comprehension, treatment preferences and satisfaction, involvement in care decisions as well as longer-term outcomes of treatment adherence and QOL. These proximal outcomes can be influenced by patient activation interventions utilizing a question prompt list (QPL). In the context of patients receiving Oncotype DX testing, the QPL could allow them to better understand the rationale for their oncologist's treatment recommendation, what it means for managing their disease, and encourage alignment of treatment preferences and selection with the Recurrence Score. Research is conducted in two phases to test the feasibility and impact of the QPL. In Phase 1, the draft QPL will be revised based on in-depth interviews with patients (N=20) and medical oncologists (N=10). Phase 2 will be a single-arm trial (N=75) to demonstrate feasibility and preliminarily assess the impact of the QPL on key outcomes.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2017
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 2, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 5, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 9, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 14, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 14, 2019
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
April 30, 2025
CompletedApril 30, 2025
April 1, 2025
1.6 years
June 5, 2017
March 20, 2025
April 26, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Knowledge Related to Testing and Treatment
Knowledge was measured for testing, treatment and overall. Responses included true/false/don't know with a point per correct answer. Testing knowledge was assessed with a 12-item scale from Richman et al. (2011), with an overall score from 0-12. Treatment knowledge was assessed with 5 items from the Breast Cancer Systemic Therapy Decision Quality Instrument (Lee et al., 2014; overall score of 0-5). Knowledge was scored separately for testing and treatment, as well as summed for a total knowledge score (0-17), which is used as the primary outcome. Higher scores correspond to more knowledge.
One month
Study Arms (1)
Question Prompt List
EXPERIMENTALPaper booklet including question prompt list.
Interventions
Patients receive a booklet that contains questions regarding their diagnosis, testing and treatment.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Women aged 40-75 who receive Oncotype DX testing are eligible.
You may not qualify if:
- Cognitive impairment that precludes informed consent and inability to converse in English given the focus on communication in this study. Clinical communication between providers and patients with limited English proficiency is beyond the scope of this work.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Georgetown Universitylead
- H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institutecollaborator
- Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institutecollaborator
Study Sites (2)
Medstar Cancer Network
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20007, United States
H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center
Tampa, Florida, 33612, United States
Related Publications (2)
O'Neill SC, Vadaparampil ST, Street RL Jr, Moore TF, Isaacs C, Han HS, Augusto B, Garcia J, Lopez K, Brilleman M, Jayasekera J, Eggly S. Characterizing patient-oncologist communication in genomic tumor testing: The 21-gene recurrence score as an exemplar. Patient Educ Couns. 2021 Feb;104(2):250-256. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2020.08.037. Epub 2020 Sep 3.
PMID: 32900604RESULTJayasekera J, Vadaparampil ST, Eggly S, Street RL Jr, Foster Moore T, Isaacs C, Han HS, Augusto B, Garcia J, Lopez K, O'Neill SC. Question Prompt List to Support Patient-Provider Communication in the Use of the 21-Gene Recurrence Test: Feasibility, Acceptability, and Outcomes. JCO Oncol Pract. 2020 Oct;16(10):e1085-e1097. doi: 10.1200/JOP.19.00661. Epub 2020 May 28.
PMID: 32463763RESULT
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Suzanne O'Neill
- Organization
- Georgetown University
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Suzanne C O'Neill, PhD
Georgetown University
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 5, 2017
First Posted
June 9, 2017
Study Start
June 2, 2017
Primary Completion
January 14, 2019
Study Completion
January 14, 2019
Last Updated
April 30, 2025
Results First Posted
April 30, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL
- Time Frame
- Clean, de-identified dataset can be made available once analyses associated with study aims are complete.
- Access Criteria
- Investigator must be willing to follow all procedures requested by IRB of record.
Data will include self-reported survey data, data obtained from chart review and audio recorded encounters. We will make de-identified data available by request to investigators not associated with the study. Priority for sharing of data will be given to junior faculty and/or faculty interested in questions related to translational science. Any requests for data from non-study investigators will be reviewed by the investigative team to ensure that it does not conflict with planned analyses, is otherwise respectful of the study participants, and complies with all relevant IRB and HIPAA regulations.