NCT03183050

Brief Summary

Clinical guidelines for women with early stage breast cancer integrate genomic tumor profiling tests such as the Oncotype DX Recurrence Score to refine recurrence estimates and systemic therapy selection when combined with existing markers. Guidelines suggest that the 25% with a high Score benefit from chemotherapy and the 50% with a low Score can safely avoid chemotherapy. Many challenges remain to maximize the benefits of testing prior to release of trial results in the next year. Strong clinical communication can impact proximal outcomes of patient comprehension, treatment preferences and satisfaction, involvement in care decisions as well as longer-term outcomes of treatment adherence and QOL. These proximal outcomes can be influenced by patient activation interventions utilizing a question prompt list (QPL). In the context of patients receiving Oncotype DX testing, the QPL could allow them to better understand the rationale for their oncologist's treatment recommendation, what it means for managing their disease, and encourage alignment of treatment preferences and selection with the Recurrence Score. Research is conducted in two phases to test the feasibility and impact of the QPL. In Phase 1, the draft QPL will be revised based on in-depth interviews with patients (N=20) and medical oncologists (N=10). Phase 2 will be a single-arm trial (N=75) to demonstrate feasibility and preliminarily assess the impact of the QPL on key outcomes.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
88

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2017

Geographic Reach
1 country

2 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 2, 2017

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 5, 2017

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 9, 2017

Completed
1.6 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 14, 2019

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

January 14, 2019

Completed
6.3 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

April 30, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

April 30, 2025

Status Verified

April 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

1.6 years

First QC Date

June 5, 2017

Results QC Date

March 20, 2025

Last Update Submit

April 26, 2025

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Knowledge Related to Testing and Treatment

    Knowledge was measured for testing, treatment and overall. Responses included true/false/don't know with a point per correct answer. Testing knowledge was assessed with a 12-item scale from Richman et al. (2011), with an overall score from 0-12. Treatment knowledge was assessed with 5 items from the Breast Cancer Systemic Therapy Decision Quality Instrument (Lee et al., 2014; overall score of 0-5). Knowledge was scored separately for testing and treatment, as well as summed for a total knowledge score (0-17), which is used as the primary outcome. Higher scores correspond to more knowledge.

    One month

Study Arms (1)

Question Prompt List

EXPERIMENTAL

Paper booklet including question prompt list.

Behavioral: Question Prompt List

Interventions

Patients receive a booklet that contains questions regarding their diagnosis, testing and treatment.

Question Prompt List

Eligibility Criteria

Age40 Years - 75 Years
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Women aged 40-75 who receive Oncotype DX testing are eligible.

You may not qualify if:

  • Cognitive impairment that precludes informed consent and inability to converse in English given the focus on communication in this study. Clinical communication between providers and patients with limited English proficiency is beyond the scope of this work.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (2)

Medstar Cancer Network

Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20007, United States

Location

H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center

Tampa, Florida, 33612, United States

Location

Related Publications (2)

  • O'Neill SC, Vadaparampil ST, Street RL Jr, Moore TF, Isaacs C, Han HS, Augusto B, Garcia J, Lopez K, Brilleman M, Jayasekera J, Eggly S. Characterizing patient-oncologist communication in genomic tumor testing: The 21-gene recurrence score as an exemplar. Patient Educ Couns. 2021 Feb;104(2):250-256. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2020.08.037. Epub 2020 Sep 3.

  • Jayasekera J, Vadaparampil ST, Eggly S, Street RL Jr, Foster Moore T, Isaacs C, Han HS, Augusto B, Garcia J, Lopez K, O'Neill SC. Question Prompt List to Support Patient-Provider Communication in the Use of the 21-Gene Recurrence Test: Feasibility, Acceptability, and Outcomes. JCO Oncol Pract. 2020 Oct;16(10):e1085-e1097. doi: 10.1200/JOP.19.00661. Epub 2020 May 28.

Results Point of Contact

Title
Suzanne O'Neill
Organization
Georgetown University

Study Officials

  • Suzanne C O'Neill, PhD

    Georgetown University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Associate Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 5, 2017

First Posted

June 9, 2017

Study Start

June 2, 2017

Primary Completion

January 14, 2019

Study Completion

January 14, 2019

Last Updated

April 30, 2025

Results First Posted

April 30, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-04

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

Data will include self-reported survey data, data obtained from chart review and audio recorded encounters. We will make de-identified data available by request to investigators not associated with the study. Priority for sharing of data will be given to junior faculty and/or faculty interested in questions related to translational science. Any requests for data from non-study investigators will be reviewed by the investigative team to ensure that it does not conflict with planned analyses, is otherwise respectful of the study participants, and complies with all relevant IRB and HIPAA regulations.

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL
Time Frame
Clean, de-identified dataset can be made available once analyses associated with study aims are complete.
Access Criteria
Investigator must be willing to follow all procedures requested by IRB of record.

Locations