NCT03181620

Brief Summary

SATIRE is a prospective, randomized control trial assessing two methods of administration of intravenous sedation and narcotics in surgical patients requiring mechanical ventilation. Many hospitals use a continuous infusion method of administering these medications. The investigators hypothesize that intermittent, bolus/sliding-scale based administration will lead to less medication being given and subsequently decrease the amount of time on mechanical ventilation without compromising patient comfort or level of sedation. Patients are randomized into a control arm (continuous infusion) and a trial arm (sliding scale hourly bolus) using versed for sedation and fentanyl for pain medication. Inclusion criteria are surgical patients requiring mechanical ventilation, including trauma patients, post operative patients, etc. Primary end point is total time of mechanical ventilation in each arm. Secondary end points are amount of medication given, time in ICU, time to discharge. Mortality and adverse events in both arms are recorded and reported to the Institutional Review Board for monitoring.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
200

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2016

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 8, 2016

Completed
9 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 5, 2017

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 9, 2017

Completed
1.8 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 31, 2019

Completed
1 day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 1, 2019

Completed
Last Updated

January 9, 2019

Status Verified

January 1, 2019

Enrollment Period

2.6 years

First QC Date

June 5, 2017

Last Update Submit

January 8, 2019

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Total Time Mechanically Ventilated

    Total time that the patient requires mechanical ventilation

    Two years

Secondary Outcomes (6)

  • ICU Length of Stay

    Two Years

  • Hospital Length of Stay

    Two Years

  • Amount of Sedative Agent Given

    Two Years

  • Amount of Narcotic Agent Given

    Two Years

  • Time at target level of sedation (RASS) in Both Arms

    Two Years

  • +1 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Continuous Infusion Arm

NO INTERVENTION

Patients receive typical continuous infusions (drips) of both sedative agent and narcotic agent for sedation/pain control while mechanically ventilated based on RASS and CPOT.

Intermittent Sliding Scale Arm

EXPERIMENTAL

Patients receive hourly boluses of both sedative agent and narcotic agent for sedation/pain control while mechanically ventilated based on a sliding scale of RASS and CPOT.

Other: Intermittent Dosing of Medication

Interventions

Typical sedative/narcotic medication administered for sedation while mechanically ventilated is given in an intravenous intermittent bolus fashion rather than a continuous intravenous drip.

Intermittent Sliding Scale Arm

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Mechanical ventilation in the Surgical ICU.
  • Age \>18 years old

You may not qualify if:

  • Use of dexmedetomidine (Precedex®)
  • Use of neuromuscular blocking agents
  • Use of propofol \>24 hours
  • Discontinuation of midazolam as sedative (i.e., switching to propofol or dexmedetomidine)
  • Therapeutic hypothermia
  • Patients that do not require sedatives/narcotics while intubated (i.e. coma, traumatic brain injury)
  • Pregnancy
  • Prisoners
  • Patients with target RASS of -3 to -5 (Deep Sedation)

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Abington Memorial Hospital

Abington, Pennsylvania, 19001, United States

RECRUITING

Related Publications (7)

  • Kress JP, Pohlman AS, O'Connor MF, Hall JB. Daily interruption of sedative infusions in critically ill patients undergoing mechanical ventilation. N Engl J Med. 2000 May 18;342(20):1471-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200005183422002.

    PMID: 10816184BACKGROUND
  • Kress JP, Pohlman AS, Hall JB. Sedation and analgesia in the intensive care unit. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002 Oct 15;166(8):1024-8. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200204-270CC. No abstract available.

    PMID: 12379543BACKGROUND
  • Jacobi J, Fraser GL, Coursin DB, Riker RR, Fontaine D, Wittbrodt ET, Chalfin DB, Masica MF, Bjerke HS, Coplin WM, Crippen DW, Fuchs BD, Kelleher RM, Marik PE, Nasraway SA Jr, Murray MJ, Peruzzi WT, Lumb PD; Task Force of the American College of Critical Care Medicine (ACCM) of the Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM), American Society of Health-System Pharmacists (ASHP), American College of Chest Physicians. Clinical practice guidelines for the sustained use of sedatives and analgesics in the critically ill adult. Crit Care Med. 2002 Jan;30(1):119-41. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200201000-00020. No abstract available.

    PMID: 11902253BACKGROUND
  • Cernaianu AC, DelRossi AJ, Flum DR, Vassilidze TV, Ross SE, Cilley JH, Grosso MA, Boysen PG. Lorazepam and midazolam in the intensive care unit: a randomized, prospective, multicenter study of hemodynamics, oxygen transport, efficacy, and cost. Crit Care Med. 1996 Feb;24(2):222-8. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199602000-00007.

    PMID: 8605792BACKGROUND
  • Kollef MH, Levy NT, Ahrens TS, Schaiff R, Prentice D, Sherman G. The use of continuous i.v. sedation is associated with prolongation of mechanical ventilation. Chest. 1998 Aug;114(2):541-8. doi: 10.1378/chest.114.2.541.

    PMID: 9726743BACKGROUND
  • Sessler CN, Gosnell MS, Grap MJ, Brophy GM, O'Neal PV, Keane KA, Tesoro EP, Elswick RK. The Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale: validity and reliability in adult intensive care unit patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002 Nov 15;166(10):1338-44. doi: 10.1164/rccm.2107138.

    PMID: 12421743BACKGROUND
  • Gelinas C, Fillion L, Puntillo KA, Viens C, Fortier M. Validation of the critical-care pain observation tool in adult patients. Am J Crit Care. 2006 Jul;15(4):420-7.

    PMID: 16823021BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Respiratory AspirationPain, PostoperativePostoperative Complications

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Respiration DisordersRespiratory Tract DiseasesPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsPainNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and Symptoms

Central Study Contacts

Nicholas M Sich, M.D.

CONTACT

Danielle Schulingkamp, RPh, BCPS

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Un-blinded, Prospective, Randomized Control Trial
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Resident Physician

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 5, 2017

First Posted

June 9, 2017

Study Start

September 8, 2016

Primary Completion

March 31, 2019

Study Completion

April 1, 2019

Last Updated

January 9, 2019

Record last verified: 2019-01

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations