NCT03177447

Brief Summary

Background: Early palliative care (EPC) is recommended but rarely integrated with advanced heart failure (HF) care. This pilot study engaged patients and family caregivers to study the feasibility and site differences in a two-site EPC trial, ENABLE CHF-PC (Educate, Nurture, Advise, Before Life Ends Comprehensive Heartcare for Patients and Caregivers). An EPC feasibility study (4/1/14-8/31/15) was conducted for patients with New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class III/IV HF and their caregivers in academic medical centers in the northeast and southeast U.S. The EPC intervention comprised: 1) an in-person palliative care consultation; and 2) telephonic nurse coach sessions and monthly calls. Patient- and caregiver-reported outcomes were collected for quality of life (QOL), symptom, health, anxiety, and depression outcomes at baseline, 12- and 24-weeks. Linear mixed-models were used to assess baseline to week 24 longitudinal changes. The intervention was tailored to rural, older adults (age≥65) with advanced HF in reducing HF morbidity and improving patient and caregiver QOL and quality of care.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
62

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2013

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

2 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 1, 2013

Completed
2.5 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 31, 2015

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 31, 2015

Completed
1.4 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 9, 2017

Completed
28 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 6, 2017

Completed
Last Updated

May 27, 2020

Status Verified

May 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

2.5 years

First QC Date

May 9, 2017

Last Update Submit

May 23, 2020

Conditions

Keywords

Cardiac FailureCongestive Heart FailureHeart DecompensationHeart Failure, Congestive

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (4)

  • Feasibility of recruitment for a large-scale RCT.

    Number (#) of participants enrolled within 2 years compared to study's target goal.

    From Date of Enrollment to 24 Weeks

  • Feasibility of retention for a large-scale RCT.

    Number (#) of participants completing study activities by 24 weeks.

    From Date of Enrollment to 24 Weeks

  • Feasibility of intervention completion for a large-scale RCT.

    Number (#) of participants completing all intervention sessions by 24 weeks.

    From Date of Enrollment to 24 Weeks

  • Feasibility of measurement completion for a large-scale RCT.

    Number (#) of participants completing outcomes measures by 24 weeks.

    From Date of Enrollment to 24 Weeks

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Patient Quality of Life

    Baseline, week 12, and week 24.

  • Patient Quality of Care

    Baseline, week 12, and week 24.

Study Arms (1)

Summative evaluation trial of ENABLE CHF-PC

OTHER

Single arm summative evaluation study was selected for several reasons: 1) to continue to determine recruitment feasibility; 2) retention- our prior work has demonstrated fairly equal dropouts in the intervention and control conditions, hence we believe we will be able to judge retention in a single arm design; 3) using a small randomized controlled trial (RCT) for power estimates runs a high risk of either overestimating or underestimating treatment effects; and 4) most importantly, the primary purpose of this study is to determine intervention efficacy. Therefore delivering the intervention to the maximum number of participants given the limitations of 2-year pilot funding allows the investigators to obtain the maximal input and experience with the intervention that is needed to achieve the study's Aim 1.

Behavioral: ENABLE CHF-PC

Interventions

ENABLE CHF-PCBEHAVIORAL

An Advanced Practice Palliative Care Nurse Coach implements Charting Your Course (CYC), a phone-based, 6-session patient curriculum and a 3-session caregiver curriculum, followed by monthly phone supportive care follow-up. Sessions 1-3 incorporate Hegel's problem-solving approach that was modified to counsel seriously ill patients using MacMillan's COPE model reactivity, which includes 4 components: Creativity, Optimism, Planning and Expert information. These sessions address adjusting to chronic illness, symptom management, communication, and decision-making. Patient sessions 4-6 comprise OUTLOOK, a life review intervention to improve QOL in serious illness developed at Duke.

Summative evaluation trial of ENABLE CHF-PC

Eligibility Criteria

Age50 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • English-speaking and able to complete baseline interview
  • Age ≥65 (Age criteria was reduced to ≥50 y/o given regional experience with HF population)
  • NYHA Stage III/IV heart failure; American College of Cardiology (ACC) Class C/D
  • Have a land-based phone or reliable cellular phone service
  • Have an agreeable partner willing to participate in the study\* (recommended) \*In our previous studies we have not required patients to have a care partner for eligibility. In this study it is essential that we have an adequate number of caregivers to test the caregiver intervention. Therefore patients without a care partner will still be considered but the final study sample size may need to be adjusted to ensure an adequate caregiver sample.

You may not qualify if:

  • Non-correctable hearing loss
  • Dementia or significant confusion (as measured by a Callahan score of ≤3
  • Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM) -IV Axis I diagnosis (e.g. schizophrenia, bipolar disorder) or active substance use disorder
  • "Caregiver" is identified by the patient as "a person who knows you well and is involved in your medical care". May be a spouse or adult family member or friend living in the same household or considered by the patient to be the primary caregiver and be willing to participate."
  • English-speaking and able to complete baseline interview 3. Have a land-based phone or reliable cellular phone service.
  • \. Non-correctable hearing loss.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (2)

University of Alabama at Birmingham

Birmingham, Alabama, 35294-0104, United States

Location

Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Dartmouth College, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Heart & Vascular Center

Lebanon, New Hampshire, 03756-0001, United States

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Bakitas M, Dionne-Odom JN, Pamboukian SV, Tallaj J, Kvale E, Swetz KM, Frost J, Wells R, Azuero A, Keebler K, Akyar I, Ejem D, Steinhauser K, Smith T, Durant R, Kono AT. Engaging patients and families to create a feasible clinical trial integrating palliative and heart failure care: results of the ENABLE CHF-PC pilot clinical trial. BMC Palliat Care. 2017 Aug 31;16(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s12904-017-0226-8.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Heart Failure

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Heart DiseasesCardiovascular Diseases

Study Officials

  • Marie A. Bakitas, DNSc, NP-C

    University of Alabama at Birmingham

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 9, 2017

First Posted

June 6, 2017

Study Start

July 1, 2013

Primary Completion

December 31, 2015

Study Completion

December 31, 2015

Last Updated

May 27, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-05

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

There is no plan to make individual participant data (IPD) available to other researchers.

Locations