Teicoplanin-based Antimicrobial Therapy in Staphylococcus Aureus Bone and Joint Infection: Tolerance, Efficacy and Experience With Subcutaneous Administration
1 other identifier
observational
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Staphylococci represent the first etiologic agents of bone and joint infection (BJI), leading glycopeptides use, especially in case of methicillin-resistance or betalactam intolerance. Teicoplanin may represent an alternative to vancomycin because of its acceptable bone penetration and possible subcutaneous administration. Various studies have shown that teicoplanin pharmacodynamic profile was superior compared to vancomycin regarding bone diffusion. Few studies have investigated the use of teicoplanin in BJI, particularly through subcutaneous administration. The aim of this study assesses the efficacy and tolerance of teicoplanin in S. aureus BJI, especially focusing on subcutaneous use. This study is a retrospective single-center observational cohort study (2001 to 2011) including all consecutive patients managed at our institution receiving teicoplanin as part of S. aureus BJI treatment.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for all trials
Started Jan 2015
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2015
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 2, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 6, 2017
CompletedJune 6, 2017
June 1, 2017
5 months
June 2, 2017
June 2, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Efficacy of teicoplanin in S.aureus bone and joint infection
The median total duration of follow-up is 90 weeks. Outcome of patients having had teicoplanin is described in this part. Treatment failure is defined as persisting infection under appropriate antimicrobial therapy, relapse after the interruption of antimicrobial therapy, necessity of surgical revision on the account of persisting septic focus ≥5 days after the first intervention, superinfections, and/or fatal outcome if BJI-related. The results obtained with IV or SC administration are compared.
90 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Tolerance of teicoplanin in S.aureus bone and joint infection
6 weeks
Pharmacocinetiks characteristics : Cmin value
2 weeks
Eligibility Criteria
Patients with bone and joint infection caused by S. aureus managed in the reference center for BJI in Lyon, between 2001 and 2011.
You may qualify if:
- \- Patients with bone and joint infection caused by S. aureus receiving teicoplanin (IV or SC) as part to treat the infection
You may not qualify if:
- \- Patients with diabetic foot- and decubitus ulcer-related BJI
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Hospices Civils de Lyon - Hopital de la Croix Rousse - Centre de reference des infection ostéo-articulaires de Lyon
Lyon, 69004, France
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- RETROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 2, 2017
First Posted
June 6, 2017
Study Start
January 1, 2015
Primary Completion
June 1, 2015
Study Completion
June 1, 2015
Last Updated
June 6, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-06