Study Stopped
After a first stop due to acupuncturists unavailability, the Covid-19 pandemic also impacted on the study time schedule for acupuncture administration and outcomes evaluation.
Randomized Comparative Trial for Persistent Pain in Spinal Cord Injury: Acupuncture vs Aspecific Needle Skin Stimulation
A Randomized, Double Blind, Comparative Trial to Assess the Efficacy of Traditional Acupuncture vs Aspecific Needle Skin Stimulation for Persistent Pain in Subjects With Spinal Cord Injury
1 other identifier
interventional
68
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Pain is one of the most common problems in patients with spinal cord injury (SCI) and persistent pain (that can be of different origin: nociceptive, neuropathic or mixed) is often poorly responsive to pharmacological therapy. Attention has been paid to the use of non-pharmacological therapies and interventional techniques in treating pain in other clinical conditions, and acupuncture has been the treatment most used and appreciated for its effectiveness. However, only few studies are available on the use of acupuncture in SCI patients. The present randomized, comparative trial aims to clarify the efficacy of traditional acupuncture vs. aspecific needle skin stimulation in treating persistent pain in subjects with spinal cord injury, by overcoming the biases reported in previous studies.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable pain
Started Sep 2017
Typical duration for not_applicable pain
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 26, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 31, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 25, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 25, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 25, 2019
CompletedAugust 23, 2022
August 1, 2022
1.3 years
May 26, 2017
August 19, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Pain reduction
Pain reduction of at least 2 points on the NRS scale
Baseline (initial visit); session 6 (3 weeks); closing session 12 (6 weeks); follow-up 1 (3 weeks after closing session 12)
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Persistence of pain reduction in Acupuncture arm
Follow-up 2 (9 weeks after closing session 12)
Reduction of drugs intake
Baseline (initial visit); session 6 (3 weeks); closing session 12 (6 weeks); follow-up 1 (3 weeks after closing session 12); follow-up 2 (9 weeks after closing session 12)
Reduction of Anxiety/Depression
Baseline (initial visit); closing session 12 (6 weeks); follow-up 1 (3 weeks after closing session 12); follow-up 2 (9 weeks after closing session 12)
Reduction of pain interference on sleep and quality of life
Baseline (initial visit); closing session 12 (6 weeks); follow-up 1 (3 weeks after closing session 12)
Improvement of quality of life
Baseline (initial visit); closing session 12 (6 weeks); follow-up 2 (9 weeks after closing session 12)
Other Outcomes (2)
Patient satisfaction
Closing session 12 (6 weeks)
Adverse events
Session 6 (3 weeks); closing session 12 (6 weeks); follow-up 1 (3 weeks after closing session 12)
Study Arms (2)
Traditional chinese acupuncture
ACTIVE COMPARATORTraditional chinese acupuncture. Administration of 12 sessions (2 per week for 6 weeks). Each session lasts 20-30 minutes.
Aspecific needle skin stimulation
SHAM COMPARATORAspecific needle skin stimulation. Administration of 12 sessions (2 per week for 6 weeks). Each session lasts 20-30 minutes.
Interventions
Traditional chinese acupuncture (somatopuncture points, auriculotherapy points, craniopuncture and wrist-ankle acupuncture). Simultaneously, the usual pharmacological treatment for pain is maintained, based on clinical needs.
Superficial needling of needles in skin areas outside the pain affected dermatome(s). Simultaneously, the usual pharmacological treatment for pain is maintained, based on clinical needs.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Persistent pain: NRS score \>2 in at least 5 assessments in 5 consecutive days, despite usual antalgic management;
- Spinal cord injury due to any etiology (both traumatic and non-traumatic);
- Spinal cord injury of any neurological level, complete or incomplete, classifiable as Asia Impairment Score (AIS) A, B, C or D;
- Stable medical conditions;
- At least 1 month away from the spinal cord injury event.
You may not qualify if:
- Sporadic pain;
- Mechanical ventilation;
- Pregnancy;
- Disorders of consciousness;
- Incapacity to give informed consent in person.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Montecatone Rehabilitation Institute S.p.A.
Imola, BO, 40026, Italy
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Angela Morreale, MD
Montecatone Rehabilitation Institute S.p.A.
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- The statistician in charge for data analysis will be blind with respect to the identity of the assignment Groups (that will be coded so as not to be recognized) and will not be involved in filling data in the database to be analyzed.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 26, 2017
First Posted
May 31, 2017
Study Start
September 25, 2017
Primary Completion
January 25, 2019
Study Completion
February 25, 2019
Last Updated
August 23, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-08