Comparison of Two-hand Mask Ventilation Technique: Standard V-E Versus Reversal V-E Technique
1 other identifier
interventional
92
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study hypothesizes that a novel reversal V-E ventilation technique will retain its high efficiency as that of standard V-E technique and will be easier to use.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2017
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 11, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 11, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 15, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 30, 2017
CompletedJuly 17, 2017
July 1, 2017
1 month
May 15, 2017
July 12, 2017
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Visual score of friendliness of mask holding technique using 11 point scale
Visual score of friendliness of mask holding technique using 11 point scale when 0 is easy and 10 is difficult.
Conclusion of masked ventilation (approximately 5 minutes)
Secondary Outcomes (3)
AUC of exhaled tidal volume (Vt) trace
Period of masked ventilation (approximately 5 minutes)
Vt/AUC
Period of masked ventilation (approximately 5 minutes)
Peak inspiratory airway pressure
Period of masked ventilation (approximately 5 minutes)
Study Arms (2)
Standard V-E ventilation technique
ACTIVE COMPARATORAfter induction of anesthesia subject will be ventilated using the standard V-E ventilation technique. Ventilation will be carried out using pressure mode ventilation at respiratory rate of 10 breaths per minute, I:E ratio of 1:2, peak inspiratory pressure of 20cmH2O and no PEEP. If the subjects can be adequately ventilated, as defined by perceivable chest movement and end tidal CO2 during the first three breaths, ventilation will continue for total ten breaths.
Reversal V-E ventilation technique
EXPERIMENTALAfter induction of anesthesia subject will be ventilated using the reversal V-E ventilation technique. Ventilation will be carried out using pressure mode ventilation at respiratory rate of 10 breaths per minute, I:E ratio of 1:2, peak inspiratory pressure of 20cmH2O and no PEEP. If the subjects can be adequately ventilated, as defined by perceivable chest movement and end tidal CO2 during the first three breaths, ventilation will continue for total ten breaths.
Interventions
For the two-handed standard V-E technique, the facemask is first placed over the bridge of the nose and mouth and then held in place by performing at two-handed jaw thrust maneuver with the index and second finger of each hand and maintaining mask contact with the patient's face by using both thumbs with mouth open. A head-tilt is performed by applying a caudal force on the mandible and mask.
While using reversal V-E technique, the anesthesia provider stands 180 degrees opposite from the head of the bed. Thenar eminence and thumbs secure the mask around the nose while the remaining fingers pull the mandible anteriorly while keeping the mouth open.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Over 18 years of age
- Requiring general anesthesia
- BMI =\>30
You may not qualify if:
- Untreated ischemic heart diseases
- Respiratory disorders, including COPD and asthma
- American Society of Anesthesiologists(ASA) physical class of 4 or greater
- Undergoing emergency surgery
- Requiring rapid sequence intubation for aspiration protection
- Non propofol - induction of anesthesia
- Requiring fiberoptic intubation
- Pregnant women or women who have given birth within the last month
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Nashville, Tennessee, 37212, United States
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Christopher Canlas, M.D.
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 15, 2017
First Posted
May 30, 2017
Study Start
April 1, 2017
Primary Completion
May 11, 2017
Study Completion
May 11, 2017
Last Updated
July 17, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share