REstricted Versus Liberal Positive End-Expiratory Pressure in Patients Without ARDS
RELAx
1 other identifier
interventional
980
1 country
13
Brief Summary
The 'REstricted versus Liberal positive end-expiratory pressure in patients without Acute respiratory distress syndrome' (RELAx) trial is a national multicenter, open randomized controlled trial in ICU patients without ARDS at start of ventilation. It will be the first RCT comparing ventilation with the lowest possible positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) level with ventilation with the median PEEP level currently practiced in the Netherlands that recruits a sufficient number of patients to test the hypothesis that ventilation with the lowest possible PEEP level is non-inferior to ventilation with a PEEP level of 8 cm H2O with regard to objective and patient-relevant clinical endpoints.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Oct 2017
Typical duration for not_applicable
13 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 23, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 30, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 26, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 14, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 16, 2020
CompletedMarch 31, 2020
March 1, 2020
2.2 years
May 23, 2017
March 30, 2020
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Ventilation-free days and alive at day 28
The number of ventilation-free days, defined as the number of days from day 1 to day 28; the patient is alive and breathes without assistance of the mechanical ventilator, if the period of unassisted breathing lasted at least 24 consecutive hours.
first 28 days after start of ventilation
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Length of stay
first 90 days after start of ventilation
Mortality
first 90 days after start of ventilation
Pulmonary complications
daily until detubation or day 28
Rescue strategies for severe hypoxemia or severe atelectasis
daily until detubation or day 28
Days with use of hemodynamic support
daily until detubation or day 28
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Ventilation with restricted PEEP level
EXPERIMENTALUse of the restricted PEEP level (0 - 5 cm H2O, the lowest possible PEEP level) after intubation and during all mechanical ventilation.
Ventilation with liberal PEEP Level
ACTIVE COMPARATORUse of the liberal PEEP level (8 cm H2O) after intubation and during all mechanical ventilation.
Interventions
Patients are randomized and ventilated with restricted PEEP (the lowest possible PEEP level, 0 - 5 cm H2O)
Patients are randomized and ventilated with liberal PEEP (the median PEEP level used in the Netherlands, 8 cm H2O)
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Admission to one of the participating ICUs
- Need for and start of invasive ventilation
- An expected duration of ventilation \> 24 hours
You may not qualify if:
- Age less than 18 years
- Patients with a clinical diagnosis of ARDS or possible ARDS with a PaO2/FiO2 \< 200 mmHg (as the benefit of ventilation with higher PEEP levels has been proven in these patients)
- Patients with ongoing cardiac ischemia due to cardiac infarction and failed revascularization, patients with increased and uncontrollable intracranial pressure (of ≥ 18 mmHg), patients with delayed cerebral ischemia after subarachnoid hemorrhage, patients with necrotizing fasciitis, and severe untreatable anemia such as in case of Jehovah's Witnesses (as these patients can be considered to be vulnerable to the potentially dangerous hypoxemia which could develop more often, even for a short time, in the 'restricted PEEP'-arm of this trial)
- Patients previously randomized in this RCT
- Patients participating in another RCT with the same clinical endpoint, or interventions possibly compromising the primary outcome
- Invasive ventilation longer than 12 hours directly preceding the present ICU admission
- Invasive ventilation longer than 1 hour before randomization
- Patients with suspected or confirmed pregnancy
- Patients with morbid obesity (body mass index \> 40)
- Patients with GOLD classification III or IV chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)
- Patients with premorbid restrictive pulmonary disease (evidence of chronic interstitial infiltration on chest radiographs)
- Patients in whom pulse oximetry is known to be unreliable, e.g., patients with carbon monoxide poisoning
- Any neurologic diagnosis that can prolong duration of mechanical ventilation, e.g., patients with Guillain-Barré syndrome, high spinal cord lesion or amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, multiple sclerosis, or myasthenia gravis
- No informed consent
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)lead
- ZonMw: The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Developmentcollaborator
- Amphia Hospitalcollaborator
- Gelre Hospitalscollaborator
- Isalacollaborator
- Maastricht University Medical Centercollaborator
- Medical Center Haaglandencollaborator
- Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuiscollaborator
- St. Antonius Hospitalcollaborator
- Amsterdam UMC, location VUmccollaborator
- Dijklander Ziekenhuiscollaborator
- Spaarne Gasthuiscollaborator
- HagaZiekenhuiscollaborator
- Rijnstate Hospitalcollaborator
Study Sites (13)
Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)
Amsterdam, Netherlands
Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis
Amsterdam, Netherlands
VU Medical Center
Amsterdam, Netherlands
Gelre Hospital
Apeldoorn, Netherlands
Rijnstate
Arnhem, Netherlands
Amphia Hospital
Breda, Netherlands
Spaarne Gasthuis
Hoofddorp, Netherlands
Westfriesgasthuis
Hoorn, Netherlands
Maastricht University Medical Center
Maastricht, Netherlands
Sint Antonius Hospital
Nieuwegein, Netherlands
Haaglanden Medical Center
The Hague, Netherlands
HagaZiekenhuis
The Hague, Netherlands
Isala Clinics
Zwolle, Netherlands
Related Publications (3)
van Meenen DMP, Algera AG, Schuijt MTU, Simonis FD, van der Hoeven SM, Neto AS, Abreu MG, Pelosi P, Paulus F, Schultz MJ; for the NEBULAE; PReVENT; RELAx investigators. Effect of mechanical power on mortality in invasively ventilated ICU patients without the acute respiratory distress syndrome: An analysis of three randomised clinical trials. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2023 Jan 1;40(1):21-28. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000001778. Epub 2022 Nov 18.
PMID: 36398740DERIVEDWriting Committee and Steering Committee for the RELAx Collaborative Group; Algera AG, Pisani L, Serpa Neto A, den Boer SS, Bosch FFH, Bruin K, Klooster PM, Van der Meer NJM, Nowitzky RO, Purmer IM, Slabbekoorn M, Spronk PE, van Vliet J, Weenink JJ, Gama de Abreu M, Pelosi P, Schultz MJ, Paulus F. Effect of a Lower vs Higher Positive End-Expiratory Pressure Strategy on Ventilator-Free Days in ICU Patients Without ARDS: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2020 Dec 22;324(24):2509-2520. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.23517.
PMID: 33295981DERIVEDAlgera AG, Pisani L, Bergmans DCJ, den Boer S, de Borgie CAJ, Bosch FH, Bruin K, Cherpanath TG, Determann RM, Dondorp AM, Dongelmans DA, Endeman H, Haringman JJ, Horn J, Juffermans NP, van Meenen DM, van der Meer NJ, Merkus MP, Moeniralam HS, Purmer I, Tuinman PR, Slabbekoorn M, Spronk PE, Vlaar APJ, Gama de Abreu M, Pelosi P, Serpa Neto A, Schultz MJ, Paulus F; RELAx Investigators and the PROVE Network Investigators. RELAx - REstricted versus Liberal positive end-expiratory pressure in patients without ARDS: protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2018 May 9;19(1):272. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2640-5.
PMID: 29739430DERIVED
Related Links
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Marcus J. Schultz, MD, PhD
Department of Intensive Care, Academic Medical Center
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Frederique Paulus, PhD
Department of Intensive Care, Academic Medical Center
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Masking Details
- Open Label
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Prof. Dr. Marcus J. Schultz
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 23, 2017
First Posted
May 30, 2017
Study Start
October 26, 2017
Primary Completion
January 14, 2020
Study Completion
March 16, 2020
Last Updated
March 31, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-03