NCT03167424

Brief Summary

The treatment of patients with intra-stent restenosis (ISR) of Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds (Abbott Vascular) remains a challenge. This study will assess the incidence, predisposing factors, pathophysiology and prognosis of the patient in this setting.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
100

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2016

Longer than P75 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

10 active sites

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 1, 2016

Completed
1.1 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 24, 2017

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 30, 2017

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2017

Completed
4 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2021

Completed
Last Updated

August 11, 2017

Status Verified

August 1, 2017

Enrollment Period

1.6 years

First QC Date

May 24, 2017

Last Update Submit

August 9, 2017

Conditions

Keywords

In-stent restenosisBioresorbable vascular scaffoldCoronary angiography

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Combined clinical end-point (cardiac death, myocardial infarction and target vessel revascularization)

    This is a well-accepted outcome measure of individual clinical end-points. Definition of myocardial infarction is similar to that used in previous RIBS studies. The occurrence of ANY of these events will qualify for the combined event. That is, Cardiac death OR Myocardial Infarctio OR target vessel revascularization. (for the cobined end point the first event will be censored for each patient and other subsequent events will not apply). For time related statistics, the first event will be censored in the KM curves. In addition to that, the time and occurrence of each individual event will be also analyzed. The same strategy will be followed for the other combined clinical outcome measures that, again, are classically defined in this field.

    1 year of clinical follow-yp

Secondary Outcomes (9)

  • Target-lesion failure (defined as cardiac death, target-vessel myocardial infarction, or ischemia-driven target-lesion revascularization)

    1 year, 2 years, 3 years, 4 years, 5 years

  • Combined clinical outcome measure (cardiac death, myocardial infarction, target lesion revascularization)

    1 year, 2 years, 3 years, 4 years, 5 years

  • Cardiac death

    1 year, 2 years, 3 years, 4 years, 5 years

  • Total mortality

    1 year, 2 years, 3 years, 4 years, 5 years

  • Myocardial infarction

    1 year, 2 years, 3 years, 4 years, 5 years

  • +4 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (1)

BVS restenosis

Patients with a Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold Restenosis

Device: Treatment of restenosis

Interventions

Treatment of in-stent restenosis

BVS restenosis

Eligibility Criteria

Age20 Years - 90 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

In-stent restenosis of bioresorbable vascular scaffold.

You may qualify if:

  • PATIENT
  • Age \> 20 and \< 85 years of age
  • Angina or objective evidence of ischemia LESION
  • ISR (\>50% diameter stenosis on visual assessment)
  • Previous stent location known

You may not qualify if:

  • PATIENT
  • Refuse to sign Informed Consent

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (10)

Complexo Universitario Hospitalario de Santiago

Santiago de Compostela, A Coruña, 15006, Spain

RECRUITING

Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge

L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, 08907, Spain

RECRUITING

Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro

Majadahonda, Madrid, 28222, Spain

RECRUITING

Hospital Central de Asturias

Oviedo, Principality of Asturias, 33006, Spain

RECRUITING

Hospital Universitario de Canarias

San Cristóbal de La Laguna, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, 38320, Spain

RECRUITING

Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau

Barcelona, 08025, Spain

RECRUITING

Hospital Clinic de Barcelona

Barcelona, 08036, Spain

RECRUITING

Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves

Granada, 18014, Spain

RECRUITING

Hospital Universitario de La Princesa

Madrid, 28006, Spain

RECRUITING

Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre

Madrid, 28041, Spain

RECRUITING

Related Publications (13)

  • Alfonso F, Zueco J, Cequier A, Mantilla R, Bethencourt A, Lopez-Minguez JR, Angel J, Auge JM, Gomez-Recio M, Moris C, Seabra-Gomes R, Perez-Vizcayno MJ, Macaya C; Restenosis Intra-stent: Balloon Angioplasty Versus Elective Stenting (RIBS) Investigators. A randomized comparison of repeat stenting with balloon angioplasty in patients with in-stent restenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003 Sep 3;42(5):796-805. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(03)00852-0.

  • Alfonso F, Melgares R, Mainar V, Lezaun R, Vazquez N, Tascon J, Pomar F, Cequier A, Angel J, Perez-Vizcayno MJ, Sabate M, Banuelos C, Fernandez C, Garcia JM; Restensois Intra-stent: Ballon angioplasty versus elective Stenting (RIBS) Investigators. Therapeutic implications of in-stent restenosis located at the stent edge. Insights from the restenosis intra-stent balloon angioplasty versus elective stenting (RIBS) randomized trial. Eur Heart J. 2004 Oct;25(20):1829-35. doi: 10.1016/j.ehj.2004.07.019.

  • Alfonso F, Auge JM, Zueco J, Bethencourt A, Lopez-Minguez JR, Hernandez JM, Bullones JA, Calvo I, Esplugas E, Perez-Vizcayno MJ, Moreno R, Fernandez C, Hernandez R, Gama-Ribeiro V; RIBS Investigators. Long-term results (three to five years) of the Restenosis Intrastent: Balloon angioplasty versus elective Stenting (RIBS) randomized study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005 Sep 6;46(5):756-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.05.050.

  • Alfonso F, Perez-Vizcayno MJ, Gomez-Recio M, Insa L, Calvo I, Hernandez JM, Bullones JA, Hernandez R, Escaned J, Macaya C, Gama-Ribeiro V, Leitao-Marques A; Restenosis Intrastent: Balloon Angioplasty Versus Elective Stenting (RIBS) Investigators. Implications of the "watermelon seeding" phenomenon during coronary interventions for in-stent restenosis. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2005 Dec;66(4):521-7. doi: 10.1002/ccd.20524.

  • Alfonso F, Cequier A, Angel J, Marti V, Zueco J, Bethencourt A, Mantilla R, Lopez-Minguez JR, Gomez-Recio M, Moris C, Perez-Vizcayno MJ, Fernandez C, Macaya C, Seabra-Gomes R; Restenosis Intra-stent Balloon angioplasty versus elective Stenting (RIBS) Investigators. Value of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association angiographic classification of coronary lesion morphology in patients with in-stent restenosis. Insights from the Restenosis Intra-stent Balloon angioplasty versus elective Stenting (RIBS) randomized trial. Am Heart J. 2006 Mar;151(3):681.e1-681.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2005.10.014.

  • Alfonso F, Perez-Vizcayno MJ, Hernandez R, Bethencourt A, Marti V, Lopez-Minguez JR, Angel J, Mantilla R, Moris C, Cequier A, Sabate M, Escaned J, Moreno R, Banuelos C, Suarez A, Macaya C; RIBS-II Investigators. A randomized comparison of sirolimus-eluting stent with balloon angioplasty in patients with in-stent restenosis: results of the Restenosis Intrastent: Balloon Angioplasty Versus Elective Sirolimus-Eluting Stenting (RIBS-II) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006 Jun 6;47(11):2152-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.10.078.

  • Alfonso F, Perez-Vizcayno MJ, Hernandez R, Fernandez C, Escaned J, Banuelos C, Bethencourt A, Lopez-Minguez JR, Angel J, Cequier A, Sabate M, Moris C, Zueco J, Seabra-Gomes R; Restenosis Intra-Stent: Balloon Angioplasty Versus Elective Stent Implantation (RIBS-I) and Restenosis Intra-Stent: Balloon Angioplasty Versus Elective Sirolimus-Eluting Stenting (RIBS-II) Investigators. Sirolimus-eluting stents versus bare-metal stents in patients with in-stent restenosis: results of a pooled analysis of two randomized studies. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2008 Oct 1;72(4):459-67. doi: 10.1002/ccd.21694.

  • Alfonso F, Perez-Vizcayno MJ, Hernandez R, Bethencourt A, Marti V, Lopez-Minguez JR, Angel J, Iniguez A, Moris C, Cequier A, Sabate M, Escaned J, Jimenez-Quevedo P, Banuelos C, Suarez A, Macaya C; RIBS-II Investigators. Long-term clinical benefit of sirolimus-eluting stents in patients with in-stent restenosis results of the RIBS-II (Restenosis Intra-stent: Balloon angioplasty vs. elective sirolimus-eluting Stenting) study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008 Nov 11;52(20):1621-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.08.025.

  • Alfonso F, Perez-Vizcayno MJ, Dutary J, Zueco J, Cequier A, Garcia-Touchard A, Marti V, Lozano I, Angel J, Hernandez JM, Lopez-Minguez JR, Melgares R, Moreno R, Seidelberger B, Fernandez C, Hernandez R; RIBS-III Study Investigators (under the auspices of the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the Spanish Society of Cardiology). Implantation of a drug-eluting stent with a different drug (switch strategy) in patients with drug-eluting stent restenosis. Results from a prospective multicenter study (RIBS III [Restenosis Intra-Stent: Balloon Angioplasty Versus Drug-Eluting Stent]). JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2012 Jul;5(7):728-37. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2012.03.017.

  • Alfonso F, Perez-Vizcayno MJ, Cardenas A, Garcia Del Blanco B, Seidelberger B, Iniguez A, Gomez-Recio M, Masotti M, Velazquez MT, Sanchis J, Garcia-Touchard A, Zueco J, Bethencourt A, Melgares R, Cequier A, Dominguez A, Mainar V, Lopez-Minguez JR, Moreu J, Marti V, Moreno R, Jimenez-Quevedo P, Gonzalo N, Fernandez C, Macaya C; RIBS V Study Investigators, under the auspices of the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the Spanish Society of Cardiology. A randomized comparison of drug-eluting balloon versus everolimus-eluting stent in patients with bare-metal stent-in-stent restenosis: the RIBS V Clinical Trial (Restenosis Intra-stent of Bare Metal Stents: paclitaxel-eluting balloon vs. everolimus-eluting stent). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Apr 15;63(14):1378-86. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.12.006. Epub 2014 Jan 8.

  • Alfonso F, Perez-Vizcayno MJ, Cardenas A, Garcia Del Blanco B, Garcia-Touchard A, Lopez-Minguez JR, Rivero F, Masotti M, Zueco J, Cequier A, Moris C, Fernandez-Ortiz A, Escaned J, Jimenez-Quevedo P, Gonzalo N, Fernandez C, Macaya C; Restenosis Intra-stent: drug-eluting Balloon vs. everolimus-eluting Stent (RIBS IV) Study Investigators (under the auspices of the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the Spanish Society of Cardiology). Rationale and design of the RIBS IV randomised clinical trial (drug-eluting balloons versus everolimus-eluting stents for patients with drug-eluting stent restenosis). EuroIntervention. 2015 Jul;11(3):336-42. doi: 10.4244/EIJY14M09_07.

  • Alfonso F, Perez-Vizcayno MJ, Cardenas A, Garcia del Blanco B, Garcia-Touchard A, Lopez-Minguez JR, Benedicto A, Masotti M, Zueco J, Iniguez A, Velazquez M, Moreno R, Mainar V, Dominguez A, Pomar F, Melgares R, Rivero F, Jimenez-Quevedo P, Gonzalo N, Fernandez C, Macaya C; RIBS IV Study Investigators (under auspices of Interventional Cardiology Working Group of Spanish Society of Cardiology). A Prospective Randomized Trial of Drug-Eluting Balloons Versus Everolimus-Eluting Stents in Patients With In-Stent Restenosis of Drug-Eluting Stents: The RIBS IV Randomized Clinical Trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015 Jul 7;66(1):23-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.04.063.

  • Alfonso F, Cuesta J, Ojeda S, Camacho-Freire S, Garcia Del Blanco B, Vaquerizo B, Zueco J, Trillo R, Mauri J, Velazquez M, Cordoba-Soriano JG, Serra A, Navarro F, Pan M, Diaz J, Otaegui I, Salvatella N, De la TorreHernandez JM, Val DD, Bastante T, Rivero F; Under the auspices of the Association of Interventional Cardiology of the Spanish Society of Cardiology. Procedural Results and One-Year Clinical Outcomes of Treatment of Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds Restenosis (from the RIBS VII Prospective Study). Am J Cardiol. 2022 Jan 1;162:31-40. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2021.09.027.

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Target Duration
5 Years
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
MD, Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 24, 2017

First Posted

May 30, 2017

Study Start

May 1, 2016

Primary Completion

December 1, 2017

Study Completion

December 1, 2021

Last Updated

August 11, 2017

Record last verified: 2017-08

Locations