NCT03167424|UnknownDMC
Restenosis Intrastent: Treatment of Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds Restenosis
RIBS VII
Observational Study of Treatment of Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds Restenosis
Loading search results
RIBS VII
Observational Study of Treatment of Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds Restenosis
Sponsor study identifier
observational
100
1 country
10
Study Start
May 2016
Actual (reported)Primary Completion
December 2017
Estimated (date passed)This estimate has passed. The registry has not confirmed an actual date for this milestone.
Study Completion
December 2021
Estimated (date passed)This estimate has passed. The registry has not confirmed an actual date for this milestone.
The treatment of patients with intra-stent restenosis (ISR) of Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds (Abbott Vascular) remains a challenge. This study will assess the incidence, predisposing factors, pathophysiology and prognosis of the patient in this setting.
Registry-reported information. Elapsed time and enrollment totals alone do not measure study progress or recruitment pace.
December 2021
Estimated (date passed)This estimate has passed. The registry has not confirmed an actual date for this milestone.
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Some registry-reported names shown below are not yet linked in this graph.
Dates and qualifiers reported by the registry. Estimated dates do not confirm that a milestone has occurred.
May 2016
Actual (reported)May 24, 2017
Actual (reported)May 30, 2017
Actual (reported)December 2017
Estimated (date passed)This estimate has passed. The registry has not confirmed an actual date for this milestone.
December 2021
Estimated (date passed)This estimate has passed. The registry has not confirmed an actual date for this milestone.
Combined clinical end-point (cardiac death, myocardial infarction and target vessel revascularization)
This is a well-accepted outcome measure of individual clinical end-points. Definition of myocardial infarction is similar to that used in previous RIBS studies. The occurrence of ANY of these events will qualify for the combined event. That is, Cardiac death OR Myocardial Infarctio OR target vessel revascularization. (for the cobined end point the first event will be censored for each patient and other subsequent events will not apply). For time related statistics, the first event will be censored in the KM curves. In addition to that, the time and occurrence of each individual event will be also analyzed. The same strategy will be followed for the other combined clinical outcome measures that, again, are classically defined in this field.
1 year of clinical follow-yp
Target-lesion failure (defined as cardiac death, target-vessel myocardial infarction, or ischemia-driven target-lesion revascularization)
1 year, 2 years, 3 years, 4 years, 5 years
Combined clinical outcome measure (cardiac death, myocardial infarction, target lesion revascularization)
1 year, 2 years, 3 years, 4 years, 5 years
Cardiac death
1 year, 2 years, 3 years, 4 years, 5 years
Total mortality
1 year, 2 years, 3 years, 4 years, 5 years
Myocardial infarction
1 year, 2 years, 3 years, 4 years, 5 years
Patients with a Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold Restenosis
Treatment of in-stent restenosis
Registry-reported names are shown in full. Names without a link have not yet been matched to a Syfrah profile.
In-stent restenosis of bioresorbable vascular scaffold.
Complexo Universitario Hospitalario de Santiago
Santiago de Compostela, A Coruña, 15006, Spain
Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge
L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, 08907, Spain
Alfonso F, Zueco J, Cequier A, Mantilla R, Bethencourt A, Lopez-Minguez JR, Angel J, Auge JM, Gomez-Recio M, Moris C, Seabra-Gomes R, Perez-Vizcayno MJ, Macaya C; Restenosis Intra-stent: Balloon Angioplasty Versus Elective Stenting (RIBS) Investigators. A randomized comparison of repeat stenting with balloon angioplasty in patients with in-stent restenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003 Sep 3;42(5):796-805. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(03)00852-0.
Alfonso F, Melgares R, Mainar V, Lezaun R, Vazquez N, Tascon J, Pomar F, Cequier A, Angel J, Perez-Vizcayno MJ, Sabate M, Banuelos C, Fernandez C, Garcia JM; Restensois Intra-stent: Ballon angioplasty versus elective Stenting (RIBS) Investigators. Therapeutic implications of in-stent restenosis located at the stent edge. Insights from the restenosis intra-stent balloon angioplasty versus elective stenting (RIBS) randomized trial. Eur Heart J. 2004 Oct;25(20):1829-35. doi: 10.1016/j.ehj.2004.07.019.
First Submitted
May 24, 2017
First Posted
May 30, 2017
Study Start
May 2016
Actual (reported)Primary Completion
December 2017
Estimated (date passed)Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro
Majadahonda, Madrid, 28222, Spain
Hospital Central de Asturias
Oviedo, Principality of Asturias, 33006, Spain
Hospital Universitario de Canarias
San Cristóbal de La Laguna, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, 38320, Spain
Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau
Barcelona, 08025, Spain
Hospital Clinic de Barcelona
Barcelona, 08036, Spain
Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves
Granada, 18014, Spain
Hospital Universitario de La Princesa
Madrid, 28006, Spain
Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre
Madrid, 28041, Spain
Alfonso F, Auge JM, Zueco J, Bethencourt A, Lopez-Minguez JR, Hernandez JM, Bullones JA, Calvo I, Esplugas E, Perez-Vizcayno MJ, Moreno R, Fernandez C, Hernandez R, Gama-Ribeiro V; RIBS Investigators. Long-term results (three to five years) of the Restenosis Intrastent: Balloon angioplasty versus elective Stenting (RIBS) randomized study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005 Sep 6;46(5):756-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.05.050.
Alfonso F, Perez-Vizcayno MJ, Gomez-Recio M, Insa L, Calvo I, Hernandez JM, Bullones JA, Hernandez R, Escaned J, Macaya C, Gama-Ribeiro V, Leitao-Marques A; Restenosis Intrastent: Balloon Angioplasty Versus Elective Stenting (RIBS) Investigators. Implications of the "watermelon seeding" phenomenon during coronary interventions for in-stent restenosis. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2005 Dec;66(4):521-7. doi: 10.1002/ccd.20524.
Alfonso F, Cequier A, Angel J, Marti V, Zueco J, Bethencourt A, Mantilla R, Lopez-Minguez JR, Gomez-Recio M, Moris C, Perez-Vizcayno MJ, Fernandez C, Macaya C, Seabra-Gomes R; Restenosis Intra-stent Balloon angioplasty versus elective Stenting (RIBS) Investigators. Value of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association angiographic classification of coronary lesion morphology in patients with in-stent restenosis. Insights from the Restenosis Intra-stent Balloon angioplasty versus elective Stenting (RIBS) randomized trial. Am Heart J. 2006 Mar;151(3):681.e1-681.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2005.10.014.
Alfonso F, Perez-Vizcayno MJ, Hernandez R, Bethencourt A, Marti V, Lopez-Minguez JR, Angel J, Mantilla R, Moris C, Cequier A, Sabate M, Escaned J, Moreno R, Banuelos C, Suarez A, Macaya C; RIBS-II Investigators. A randomized comparison of sirolimus-eluting stent with balloon angioplasty in patients with in-stent restenosis: results of the Restenosis Intrastent: Balloon Angioplasty Versus Elective Sirolimus-Eluting Stenting (RIBS-II) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006 Jun 6;47(11):2152-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.10.078.
Alfonso F, Perez-Vizcayno MJ, Hernandez R, Fernandez C, Escaned J, Banuelos C, Bethencourt A, Lopez-Minguez JR, Angel J, Cequier A, Sabate M, Moris C, Zueco J, Seabra-Gomes R; Restenosis Intra-Stent: Balloon Angioplasty Versus Elective Stent Implantation (RIBS-I) and Restenosis Intra-Stent: Balloon Angioplasty Versus Elective Sirolimus-Eluting Stenting (RIBS-II) Investigators. Sirolimus-eluting stents versus bare-metal stents in patients with in-stent restenosis: results of a pooled analysis of two randomized studies. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2008 Oct 1;72(4):459-67. doi: 10.1002/ccd.21694.
Alfonso F, Perez-Vizcayno MJ, Hernandez R, Bethencourt A, Marti V, Lopez-Minguez JR, Angel J, Iniguez A, Moris C, Cequier A, Sabate M, Escaned J, Jimenez-Quevedo P, Banuelos C, Suarez A, Macaya C; RIBS-II Investigators. Long-term clinical benefit of sirolimus-eluting stents in patients with in-stent restenosis results of the RIBS-II (Restenosis Intra-stent: Balloon angioplasty vs. elective sirolimus-eluting Stenting) study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008 Nov 11;52(20):1621-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.08.025.
Alfonso F, Perez-Vizcayno MJ, Dutary J, Zueco J, Cequier A, Garcia-Touchard A, Marti V, Lozano I, Angel J, Hernandez JM, Lopez-Minguez JR, Melgares R, Moreno R, Seidelberger B, Fernandez C, Hernandez R; RIBS-III Study Investigators (under the auspices of the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the Spanish Society of Cardiology). Implantation of a drug-eluting stent with a different drug (switch strategy) in patients with drug-eluting stent restenosis. Results from a prospective multicenter study (RIBS III [Restenosis Intra-Stent: Balloon Angioplasty Versus Drug-Eluting Stent]). JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2012 Jul;5(7):728-37. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2012.03.017.
Alfonso F, Perez-Vizcayno MJ, Cardenas A, Garcia Del Blanco B, Seidelberger B, Iniguez A, Gomez-Recio M, Masotti M, Velazquez MT, Sanchis J, Garcia-Touchard A, Zueco J, Bethencourt A, Melgares R, Cequier A, Dominguez A, Mainar V, Lopez-Minguez JR, Moreu J, Marti V, Moreno R, Jimenez-Quevedo P, Gonzalo N, Fernandez C, Macaya C; RIBS V Study Investigators, under the auspices of the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the Spanish Society of Cardiology. A randomized comparison of drug-eluting balloon versus everolimus-eluting stent in patients with bare-metal stent-in-stent restenosis: the RIBS V Clinical Trial (Restenosis Intra-stent of Bare Metal Stents: paclitaxel-eluting balloon vs. everolimus-eluting stent). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Apr 15;63(14):1378-86. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.12.006. Epub 2014 Jan 8.
Alfonso F, Perez-Vizcayno MJ, Cardenas A, Garcia Del Blanco B, Garcia-Touchard A, Lopez-Minguez JR, Rivero F, Masotti M, Zueco J, Cequier A, Moris C, Fernandez-Ortiz A, Escaned J, Jimenez-Quevedo P, Gonzalo N, Fernandez C, Macaya C; Restenosis Intra-stent: drug-eluting Balloon vs. everolimus-eluting Stent (RIBS IV) Study Investigators (under the auspices of the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the Spanish Society of Cardiology). Rationale and design of the RIBS IV randomised clinical trial (drug-eluting balloons versus everolimus-eluting stents for patients with drug-eluting stent restenosis). EuroIntervention. 2015 Jul;11(3):336-42. doi: 10.4244/EIJY14M09_07.
Alfonso F, Perez-Vizcayno MJ, Cardenas A, Garcia del Blanco B, Garcia-Touchard A, Lopez-Minguez JR, Benedicto A, Masotti M, Zueco J, Iniguez A, Velazquez M, Moreno R, Mainar V, Dominguez A, Pomar F, Melgares R, Rivero F, Jimenez-Quevedo P, Gonzalo N, Fernandez C, Macaya C; RIBS IV Study Investigators (under auspices of Interventional Cardiology Working Group of Spanish Society of Cardiology). A Prospective Randomized Trial of Drug-Eluting Balloons Versus Everolimus-Eluting Stents in Patients With In-Stent Restenosis of Drug-Eluting Stents: The RIBS IV Randomized Clinical Trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015 Jul 7;66(1):23-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.04.063.
Alfonso F, Cuesta J, Ojeda S, Camacho-Freire S, Garcia Del Blanco B, Vaquerizo B, Zueco J, Trillo R, Mauri J, Velazquez M, Cordoba-Soriano JG, Serra A, Navarro F, Pan M, Diaz J, Otaegui I, Salvatella N, De la TorreHernandez JM, Val DD, Bastante T, Rivero F; Under the auspices of the Association of Interventional Cardiology of the Spanish Society of Cardiology. Procedural Results and One-Year Clinical Outcomes of Treatment of Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds Restenosis (from the RIBS VII Prospective Study). Am J Cardiol. 2022 Jan 1;162:31-40. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2021.09.027.
This estimate has passed. The registry has not confirmed an actual date for this milestone.
Study Completion
December 2021
Estimated (date passed)This estimate has passed. The registry has not confirmed an actual date for this milestone.
Last Updated
August 11, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-08
Download the complete ClinicalTrials.gov record imported by Syfrah, including fields not shown in this page. The registry may contain a newer revision.
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov.
JSON downloads include source attribution and retrieval details alongside the unchanged original record or the separately normalized values.
Source retrieved: