Laminar Drainage Implant: Safety of a Novel Surgical Treatment for Refractory Glaucoma.
1 other identifier
interventional
15
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Purpose: To assess the feasibility of a surgical technique and present the preliminary safety results of a new glaucoma device devoid of a tube in painful blind eyes. Methods: Fifteen end-stage glaucomatous eyes without light perception vision were treated with a novel laminar drainage implant. Intraocular pressure was measured preoperatively and up to 24 months after surgery using a Goldmann applanation tonometer. A scale ranging from 0 to 10 was used to evaluate ocular pain. Conjunctival hyperemia, discharge, erosion or retraction, aqueous humor leakage, corneal edema, hyphema, anterior chamber cells and depth, dislocation of the implant, and filtering bleb height were assessed by slit-lamp biomicroscopy. Anterior segment optical coherence tomography was also assessed.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2011
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 2, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 2, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 22, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 25, 2017
CompletedMay 25, 2017
May 1, 2017
4.8 years
May 22, 2017
May 23, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change for baseline of intra-ocular pressure (Goldmann applanation tonometry)
The criteria for IOP reduction success were 15 mmHg and a 20% reduction compared to the baseline preoperative IOP.
on days 1, 3, 7, 14, and 30, once a month up to 6 months, and every 6 months from 6 months to 2 years.
Secondary Outcomes (8)
Ocular pain intensity ratting change from baseline
on days 1, 3, 7, 14, and 30, once a month up to 6 months, and every 6 months from 6 months to 2 years.
Conjunctival discharge presence/absence change from baseline
on days 1, 3, 7, 14, and 30, once a month up to 6 months, and every 6 months from 6 months to 2 years.
Conjunctival erosion or retraction appearence after surgery
on days 1, 3, 7, 14, and 30, once a month up to 6 months, and every 6 months from 6 months to 2 years.
Corneal edema presence change from baseline
on days 1, 3, 7, 14, and 30, once a month up to 6 months, and every 6 months from 6 months to 2 years.
Anterior chamber depth (gonioscopy) change from baseline
on days 1, 3, 7, 14, and 30, once a month up to 6 months, and every 6 months from 6 months to 2 years.
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
laminar drainage implant surgery
OTHERpatients included and operated
Interventions
A clear corneal traction suture was placed to achieve superior-temporal quadrant exposure, where a 90° conjunctival fornix-based flap was made, associated with two radial relaxing incisions. A half-thickness scleral tunnel (4.5 mm from the limbus and 4.0 mm wide) was made using a crescent blade and a superior-temporal iridectomy was performed through . Then, the tunnel end was shunted to the AC using a 1.5-mm-wide blade with a sharp tip. The LDI was inserted into the scleral tunnel so that its tip was positioned in the AC periphery and the implant was anchored to the sclera using 7-0 polypropylene thread with two separate sutures. Next, fistula function was assessed by the aqueous humor leakage test at the scleral tunnel entry site. Then, the conjunctiva was repositioned and running sutures were performed with 7-0 polyglactin for the relaxing incisions and mattress sutures were performed in the limbus using 10-0 nylon.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- patients aged 18 years or older with a painful blind eye refractory to clinical treatment and an intraocular pressure (IOP) ≥ 30 mmHg.
You may not qualify if:
- eyes with extensive conjunctival scarring, a disorganized anterior segment, or retinal detachment identified by ophthalmoscopy or B-scan ultrasonography.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (5)
Wolf A, Hod Y, Buckman G, Stein N, Geyer O. Use of Autologous Scleral Graft in Ahmed Glaucoma Valve Surgery. J Glaucoma. 2016 Apr;25(4):365-70. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000000232.
PMID: 25719229BACKGROUNDHjermstad MJ, Fayers PM, Haugen DF, Caraceni A, Hanks GW, Loge JH, Fainsinger R, Aass N, Kaasa S; European Palliative Care Research Collaborative (EPCRC). Studies comparing Numerical Rating Scales, Verbal Rating Scales, and Visual Analogue Scales for assessment of pain intensity in adults: a systematic literature review. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2011 Jun;41(6):1073-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2010.08.016.
PMID: 21621130BACKGROUNDChristakis PG, Zhang D, Budenz DL, Barton K, Tsai JC, Ahmed IIK; ABC-AVB Study Groups. Five-Year Pooled Data Analysis of the Ahmed Baerveldt Comparison Study and the Ahmed Versus Baerveldt Study. Am J Ophthalmol. 2017 Apr;176:118-126. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2017.01.003. Epub 2017 Jan 17.
PMID: 28104418RESULTThieme H, Choritz L, Schuart C, Wecke T. [Tube versus trabeculectomy study]. Ophthalmologe. 2013 Aug;110(8):728-32. doi: 10.1007/s00347-013-2840-z. German.
PMID: 23873397RESULTAref AA, Gedde SJ, Budenz DL. Glaucoma Drainage Implant Surgery. Dev Ophthalmol. 2017;59:43-52. doi: 10.1159/000458485. Epub 2017 Apr 25.
PMID: 28442686RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Sebastião C. Sobrinho, Md, Ph.D
Hospital São Geraldo-Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DEVICE FEASIBILITY
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- co-advisor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 22, 2017
First Posted
May 25, 2017
Study Start
March 1, 2011
Primary Completion
December 2, 2015
Study Completion
September 2, 2016
Last Updated
May 25, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-05