Assessment of Ability of 3D Fluorscopy in Aiding Accurate Syndesmotic Reduction Following Traumatic Ankle Injury
Does Intraoperative 3D Fluoroscopy Accurately Assess Syndesmotic Reduction Following Traumatic Ankle Injury?
1 other identifier
interventional
30
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine if use of new imaging technology termed "3D fluoroscopy" will lead the surgeon to change the position of the fractured bones to a more accurate position.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2017
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 19, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 22, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 11, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 11, 2018
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
September 12, 2019
CompletedSeptember 12, 2019
August 1, 2019
1.5 years
May 19, 2017
August 22, 2019
August 22, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Number of Participants for Which the Surgeon Changed Reduction of Syndesmotic Reduction Because of Information Provided by 3D Fluoroscopy
Patients with syndesmotic instability will undergo reduction of the syndesmosis followed by provisional fixation with a clamp or Kirshner wire. The reduction quality will be initially compared to the contralateral ankle mortise and talar-dome lateral radiographs using the technique of Summers (2D Fluoroscopy). After the attending surgeon is satisfied with the reduction quality, 3D fluoroscopy will be used to generate additional images to assess syndesmotic reductions.
Immediately at the time of 3D Fluoroscopy
Secondary Outcomes (12)
Number of Participants for Which the Surgeon Changed Reduction of Fibular Fracture Reduction Because of Information Provided by 3D Fluoroscopy
Immediately at the time of 3D Fluoroscopy
Pain as Assessed by the AOFAS Score
3 months after 3D Fluoroscopy
Function as Assessed by the AOFAS Score
3 months after 3D Fluoroscopy
Alignment as Assessed by the AOFAS Score
3 months after 3D Fluoroscopy
Pain as Assessed by the AOFAS Score
6 months after 3D Fluoroscopy
- +7 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
2D Fluoroscopy then 3D Fluoroscopy
EXPERIMENTALPatients with syndesmotic instability will undergo reduction of the syndesmosis followed by provisional fixation with a clamp or Kirshner wire. The reduction quality will be initially compared to the contralateral ankle mortise and talar-dome lateral radiographs using the technique of Summers et al (2D Fluoroscopy). After the attending surgeon is satisfied with the reduction quality, 3D fluoroscopy will be used to generate additional images to assess syndesmotic and fibular reductions. Both 2D and 3D Fluoroscopy will be performed using device "Ziehm Vision RFD 3D image-intensified fluoroscopic x-ray system".
Interventions
Patients with syndesmotic instability will undergo reduction of the syndesmosis followed by provisional fixation with a clamp or Kirshner wire. The reduction quality will be initially compared to the contralateral ankle mortise and talar-dome lateral radiographs using the technique of Summers et al i.e. 2D Fluoroscopy using device Ziehm Vision RFD 3D image-intensified fluoroscopic x-ray system.
After the attending surgeon is satisfied with the reduction quality from 2D Fluoroscopy, 3D fluoroscopy using device Ziehm Vision RFD 3D image-intensified fluoroscopic x-ray system will be used to generate additional images to assess syndesmotic and fibular reductions.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Skeletally mature
- Patients with unilateral, acute, displaced ankle fractures with preoperative evidence of syndesmotic disruption or intraoperative evidence of syndesmotic instability following malleolar fixation.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients skeletally immature;
- Patients less than age 18 years and more than age 75;
- Patients with previous ankle trauma to either ankle;
- Patients with bilateral ankle injuries;
- Patients with previous osseous injuries to the tibia or fibula; and
- Patients with isolated syndesmotic injury and no fracture (i.e. high ankle sprains)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
The University of Texas at Health Science Center at Houston
Houston, Texas, 77030, United States
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Joshua Gary, MD
- Organization
- The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Joshua L Gary, MD
The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 19, 2017
First Posted
May 22, 2017
Study Start
March 1, 2017
Primary Completion
September 11, 2018
Study Completion
September 11, 2018
Last Updated
September 12, 2019
Results First Posted
September 12, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-08