RAND Center of Excellence for the Study of Appropriateness of Care in CAM
CERC
2 other identifiers
observational
2,025
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The RAND approach to appropriateness makes it feasible to take the best of what is known from research and apply it-using the expertise of experienced clinicians-over the wide range of patients and presentations seen in real-world clinical practice. The major limitation of the RAND approach, however, is that it still utilizes a limited definition of appropriateness; one that relies heavily on safety, efficacy and effectiveness. Until now the RAND method has not included patient preferences or resource utilization effectiveness. These are both serious absences. In the past decade we have seen an evolution in outcome measures from clinician based objective measures to patient-centered and subjective measures. The development of Patient Based Outcome Assessments (PBOA); Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) and the recent establishment of Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) all contest to the growing importance of the patient's perspective in determining outcomes and therefore also appropriateness. In the Center, we propose to advance appropriateness methods by adding three additional dimensions to the RAND appropriateness methods: patient outcomes, patient preferences and cost
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Sep 2011
Longer than P75 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 30, 2011
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 16, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 22, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2018
CompletedApril 16, 2019
April 1, 2019
7.3 years
February 16, 2017
April 11, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Project 1 Clinical Appropriateness
Measuring appropriateness rate of manipulation for chronic back pain
4 years
Eligibility Criteria
Chiropractic physicians Chiropractic patients
You may qualify if:
- Current chiropractic patient over 21 years with chronic low back pain and chronic cervical pain.
- They must have had the pain for 3 months.
You may not qualify if:
- Under 21, non-specific chronic low back pain or cervical pain, personal injury case able to access the project on line.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- RANDlead
- University of California, Los Angelescollaborator
Study Sites (1)
RAND Corporation
Santa Monica, California, 90407, United States
Related Publications (1)
Herman PM, Edgington SE, Sorbero ME, Hurwitz EL, Goertz CM, Coulter ID. Visit Frequency and Outcomes for Patients Using Ongoing Chiropractic Care for Chronic Low-Back and Neck Pain: An Observational Longitudinal Study. Pain Physician. 2021 Jan;24(1):E61-E74.
PMID: 33400439DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ian D Coulter, PhD
RAND Cororation
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- OTHER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 16, 2017
First Posted
May 22, 2017
Study Start
September 30, 2011
Primary Completion
December 31, 2018
Study Completion
December 31, 2018
Last Updated
April 16, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-04