Alabama Community Healthy Marriage Initiative Evaluation Project for Couples
AHMREI
The Alabama Healthy Marriage and Relationship Education Initiative
1 other identifier
interventional
1,858
1 country
10
Brief Summary
The Alabama Healthy Marriage and Relationship Education Initiative (AHMREI), a large-scale partnership among Auburn University and 9 additional implementation partners at Family Resource Centers, implements multiple program activities that respond to family needs and integrate comprehensive services to promote healthy marriages and relationships, as authorized by the Claims Resolution Act of 2010 (Pub. L. 111-291). The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of two selected couples education curricula- Elevate and Couples Connecting Mindfully. The programs are intended to improve the well-being of individuals, couples, and families in domains such as couple well-being, parenting skills, individual skills, and economic stability.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Aug 2016
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
10 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 11, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 5, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 18, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 29, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 29, 2020
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
September 14, 2021
CompletedFebruary 19, 2025
February 1, 2025
4.1 years
May 5, 2017
July 20, 2021
February 14, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Couple Satisfaction Index
Couple satisfaction was measured using an abbreviated version of the Couple Satisfaction Index utilized in previously published studies. The 3 items (rated from 1 \[Not at all\] to 6 \[Completely\]) are: "I have a warm and comfortable relationship with my partner," "How rewarding is your relationship with your partner?" and "In general, how satisfied are you with your relationship?" Mean composites were calculated, and the total scale ranges from 1 to 6. Higher scores indicate higher couple satisfaction.
6 months
The Couple Relationship Skills Inventory
Couple relationship skills were measured using 32 items from the Couple Relationship Skills Inventory (CRSI). This measure was constructed to match the core relationship skills and predictors of couple quality emphasized in the HMRE programs provided. Items were taken from established and validated social science measures assessing commitment, intimate partner knowledge, friendship, caring behaviors, conflict management, and external support. Example items include, "I commit effort every day to making my relationship work," "I know my partner's current life stresses," "When things 'get heated' I suggest we take a break to calm down," and "I initiate physical affection with my partner." Items ranged from 1 (Very strongly disagree) to 7 (Very strongly agree). Composite sum scores were created at the individual level and the total scale ranges from 1-224 (i.e., 32\*7 = 224). Higher scores indicate greater couple relationship skills.
8 weeks
Individual Mental Health
Individual mental health was measured using the SF-12 Mental Component Summary score assessing anxiety, depression, sense of wellbeing, and social/emotional functioning. Per the measure's design, items were asked on differing scales (e.g., 1 to 3 or 1 to 5) with different anchor responses (e.g., all of the time to none of the time, or not at all to extremely). Example items include, "During the past month how much of the time have you accomplished less than you would like" or "During the past month how often have you felt downhearted and depressed?" The SF-12 Mental Component Summary score has shown scale reliability and validity in empirical studies. Scores range from 0 to 100 with a mean of 50 and SD of 10 in the general U.S. population. Higher scores indicate better individual mental health.
6 months
Study Arms (3)
Couples Connecting Mindfully Curriculum
EXPERIMENTALReceives the Couples Connecting Mindfully curriculum over a 6 week period.
ELEVATE Curriculum
EXPERIMENTALReceives the ELEVATE curriculum over a 6 week period.
Control
NO INTERVENTIONNo programming is offered.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- To be eligible for the AHRMEI Couples Evaluation Project, the applicant must be part of a couple (as defined by the couple) in which both couple members are applying to the program and that: both members of the couple are 19 years of age or older, both members of the couple can attend the majority of the class offerings.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Auburn Universitylead
- Mathematica Policy Research, Inc.collaborator
- Department of Health and Human Servicescollaborator
Study Sites (10)
Auburn University
Auburn, Alabama, 36849, United States
Hope Place Family Resource Center
Brewton, Alabama, 36426, United States
Parents and Children Together
Decatur, Alabama, 35602, United States
The Family Success Center of Etowah County
Gadsden, Alabama, 35903, United States
Family Guidance Center
Montgomery, Alabama, 36116, United States
Sylacauga Alliance for Family Enhancement
Sylacauga, Alabama, 35150, United States
Tuscaloosa's ONE Place
Tuscaloosa, Alabama, 35404, United States
Circle of Care Center for Families
Valley, Alabama, 36854, United States
IMPACT Family Counseling
Vestavia Hills, Alabama, 35216, United States
Alabama Cooperative Extension Syestem- Elmore County
Wetumpka, Alabama, 36092, United States
Related Publications (3)
Funk JL, Rogge RD. Testing the ruler with item response theory: increasing precision of measurement for relationship satisfaction with the Couples Satisfaction Index. J Fam Psychol. 2007 Dec;21(4):572-83. doi: 10.1037/0893-3200.21.4.572.
PMID: 18179329BACKGROUNDGandek B, Ware JE, Aaronson NK, Apolone G, Bjorner JB, Brazier JE, Bullinger M, Kaasa S, Leplege A, Prieto L, Sullivan M. Cross-validation of item selection and scoring for the SF-12 Health Survey in nine countries: results from the IQOLA Project. International Quality of Life Assessment. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998 Nov;51(11):1171-8. doi: 10.1016/s0895-4356(98)00109-7.
PMID: 9817135BACKGROUNDWare J Jr, Kosinski M, Keller SD. A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care. 1996 Mar;34(3):220-33. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199603000-00003.
PMID: 8628042BACKGROUND
Limitations and Caveats
Measures were limited to self-report, which represent the participant's subjective perspective of skills and individual/relationship functioning.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Francesca Adler-Baeder
- Organization
- Auburn University
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Francesca Adler-Baeder, Ph.D.
Auburn University
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 5, 2017
First Posted
May 18, 2017
Study Start
August 11, 2016
Primary Completion
September 29, 2020
Study Completion
September 29, 2020
Last Updated
February 19, 2025
Results First Posted
September 14, 2021
Record last verified: 2025-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share