Toothbrush Wear and Its Effect on Subgingival Inflammation Using Two Different Brushing Techniques
A Tooth Brushing Technique That Reduces Gingival Inflammation and Toothbrush Deformation
1 other identifier
interventional
48
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Toothbrush plaque removal, along with interproximal flossing, helps to maintain the oral cavity free from periodontal diseases and dental caries. Although techniques such as the Bass Technique (BT), the Modified Bass Technique (MBT) and the Modified Stillman Technique (MST) are taught to dental students, dental hygiene students, and dental assistants, there is little evidence to discern which technique is more effective in reducing or preventing gingival inflammation. At Tufts University School of Dental Medicine (TUSDM), a modification of the Bass intrasulcular technique is advocated to many students. We call this modification of the Bass technique a Stationary Bristle Technique (SBT), which is an intrasulcular technique that maintains the toothbrush bristle ends essentially stationary on the tooth cervically and in the gingival crevice. In this study, half of the participants were taught the Stationary Bristle Technique Group, while the other half were not be provided with instructions, but asked to brush as normal (non-interventional group) throughout the duration of the study.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Aug 2015
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 3, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 16, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 18, 2017
CompletedMarch 12, 2019
March 1, 2019
5 months
May 16, 2017
March 8, 2019
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in Gingival Inflammation
Measured by the percentage of sites with BoP. The percentage of sites with BoP at each time point will be calculated by group
From Baseline up to 4 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Toothbrush Bristle Deformation
From baseling up to 16 weeks
Change in BoP
From baseline up to 16 weeks
Study Arms (2)
Stationary Bristle Technique (SBT)
EXPERIMENTALInstructed brushing method. Participants are asked to brush twice daily, for 2 minutes at a time, following instructions for the Stationary Bristle Technique.
Non-Stationary Bristle Technique (NSBT)
NO INTERVENTIONThe control group will be asked to brush twice daily, for 2 minutes at a time, following their normal toothbrushing technique.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Subjects must be at least 18 years of age
- Subjects must have at least 20 teeth
- Subjects must have had a professional dental prophylaxis done in the 3 months prior to the beginning of the study
- Subjects exhibiting 10% or greater BoP at the baseline examination
You may not qualify if:
- Subjects wearing fixed orthodontic appliances (including lingual retainers or Invisalign®)
- Subjects who smoke (=more than 0 cigarettes a day)
- Subjects who received antibiotic treatment during the month prior to the beginning of the study
- Subjects who have cervical probing depth (PD) greater than 3mm
- Subjects diagnosed with periodontal disease at any site as defined bleeding on probing with cervical probing depths greater than 3 mm and loss of cervical attachment.
- Subjects who are currently pregnant (self-report).
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Tufts Universitylead
Study Sites (1)
Tufts University School of Dental Medicine
Boston, Massachusetts, 02111, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Paul A Levi, Jr., DMD
TUSDM
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 16, 2017
First Posted
May 18, 2017
Study Start
August 3, 2015
Primary Completion
January 1, 2016
Study Completion
March 1, 2016
Last Updated
March 12, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share