Safety and Efficacy of a Novel Facemask for Positive Pressure Ventilation
1 other identifier
interventional
152
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Positive pressure ventilation can be life saving for patients who are hypoxic, hypercapneic or apneic. Manual ventilation with a facemask is a skill that is routinely required for emergency medical technicians, respiratory therapists, nurses and physicians. Although mask ventilation skills are routinely taught, even the most skilled and experienced anesthesiologists struggle to effectively mask-ventilate. The effective use of a standard mask requires the simultaneous establishment of a seal between the mask and face and the lifting of the jaw. The preferred grip is referred to as the C\&E technique. The C\&E technique requires the index finger and thumb to form a "C" and push down on the mask to establish a seal between the mask and face. The lateral three fingers form the "E" and wrap under the jaw to provide lift. The grip required to establish the seal and jaw lift simultaneously is awkward and difficult to teach. The basic design of the standard facemask has not changed in approximately 100 years. This study will evaluate a new mask design, Warters Mask, is based on a novel design that allows a far more ergonomic grip. The C\&E technique is replaced by a more natural grip. With the Warters Mask, downward pressure with the palm of the hand centered on the mask provides the seal between the face and the mask. The other four fingers align under the jaw to provide lift.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Sep 2015
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 15, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 15, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 15, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 16, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 18, 2017
CompletedMay 18, 2017
May 1, 2017
1.3 years
May 16, 2017
May 16, 2017
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Warters Scale Score
The primary outcome will be the Warters Scale score for each mask, compared between patients.
one year
Study Arms (2)
Waters Mask
EXPERIMENTALAll anesthesiologists and CRNAs will view an instructional video on the use of the Warters Mask.. Following induction of general anesthesia with the standard of care sequence of medications, each patient will then have mask ventilation performed and graded (Han and Warters Scales).Mask ventilation will be scored before and after the standard administration of paralytic medication.
Standard Mask
ACTIVE COMPARATORFollowing induction of general anesthesia with the standard of care sequence of medications, each patient will then have mask ventilation performed and graded (Han and Warters Scales).Mask ventilation will be scored before and after the standard administration of paralytic medication.
Interventions
All anesthesiologists and CRNAs will view an instructional video on the use of the Warters Mask. Following induction of general anesthesia with the standard of care sequence of medications, each patient will then have mask ventilation performed and graded (Han and Warters Scales).
Following induction of general anesthesia with the standard of care sequence of medications, each patient will then have mask ventilation performed and graded (Han and Warters Scales). Mask ventilation will be scored with both masks before and after the standard administration of paralytic medication.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age \>18 years.
- Patients having elective surgery (designated by priority level of 5) requiring general endotracheal anesthesia.
You may not qualify if:
- Need for awake intubation based on standard preoperative evaluation by the attending anesthesiologist.
- Increased risk for aspiration of gastric contents due to full stomach, pregnancy, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, and/or hiatal hernia as identified during the pre-operative assessment.
- Previous tracheostomy procedure.
- Patient is cognitively incapable of providing their consent for the study.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Medical University of South Carolina
Charleston, South Carolina, 29425, United States
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Tod Brown, MD
Assistant Professor
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 16, 2017
First Posted
May 18, 2017
Study Start
September 15, 2015
Primary Completion
December 15, 2016
Study Completion
December 15, 2016
Last Updated
May 18, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-05