Single-Case Study on Therapeutic Change in Chronic Low Back Pain
Comparing Therapeutic Change During Exposure and Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy in the Context Chronic Low Back Pain
1 other identifier
interventional
12
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Exploration of treatment processes during exposure and cognitive-behavioral therapy in the context of chronic low back pain in a multiple baseline single-case design.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2015
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2015
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 10, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 17, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2017
CompletedJuly 5, 2017
July 1, 2017
2 years
November 10, 2015
July 3, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Therapeutic changes during the course of treatment compared to baseline
Specifically developed questionnaire on therapeutic change processes
from baseline phase (1-3 weeks) to intervention phase (5 weeks)
Secondary Outcomes (9)
Pain severity at posttest and follow-up compared to baseline pain severity
from pretest (admission) to posttests (an expected average of 8 weeks after admission) to follow-up (an expected average of 6 months after completion)
Pain-related anxiety at posttest and follow-up compared to baseline pain-related anxiety
from pretest (admission) to posttests (an expected average of 8 weeks after admission) to follow-up (an expected average of 6 months after completion)
Pain catastrophizing thoughts at posttest and follow-up compared to baseline pain catastrophizing thoughts
from pretest (admission) to posttests (an expected average of 8 weeks after admission) to follow-up (an expected average of 6 months after completion)
Perceived harmfulness of daily activities at posttest and follow-up compared to baseline perceived harmfulness of daily activities
from pretest (admission) to posttests (an expected average of 8 weeks after admission) to follow-up (an expected average of 6 months after completion)
Pain-related avoidance behavior at posttest and follow-up compared to baseline pain-related avoidance behavior
from pretest (admission) to posttests (an expected average of 8 weeks after admission) to follow-up (an expected average of 6 months after completion)
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Exposure in vivo
ACTIVE COMPARATORIn the Exposure in vivo (EXP) condition, patients are given a careful explanation of the fear-avoidance model. Patients are encouraged to adopt the model to their individual situation. Factors for the maintenance of chronic pain (such as pain cognitions and pain-related fear) are discussed. Especially, negative consequences of avoidance behavior are highlighted. In preparation of the exposure sessions, patients develop an individual fear hierarchy using the Photo Series of Daily Actives. Subsequently, patients are encouraged to test their fear-avoidance beliefs during behavioral experiments and to reduce avoidance behaviors during individually tailored exposure exercises.
Cognitive Behavioral Psychotherapy
ACTIVE COMPARATORIn the Cognitive Behavioral Psychotherapy (CBT) condition, patients are introduced to several strategies to improve their pain management. The principle of graded activity encourages patients to re-engage in former activities by dividing these activities into smaller steps. Predetermined resting periods are offered as a form to prevent patients from phases of excessive demands followed by long terms of recovery. Progressive muscle relaxation is introduced as a technique to improve the experience of pain. The strategy of attention shifting is presented to change their perception of pain. Maladaptive pain-related cognitions are identified and challenged by cognitive interventions.
Interventions
graded activity, relaxation techniques and cognitive interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- \> 6 months chronic low back pain
- Sufficient level on fear avoidance scores (PCS \> 35, PASS \>20, QBPDS \> 30, PDI \> 20 and Phoda harm ratings of 13 activities \> 50, including 8 \> 80)
- German-speaking
- Agreeing to participate, verified by completion of informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Red flags
- Pregnancy
- Illiteracy
- Psychoses
- Alcohol addiction
- Surgeries during the last 6 months or planed surgeries
- Specific medical disorders or cardiovascular diseases preventing participation in physical exercise
- Participating in another psychotherapy
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Philipps University Marburglead
- Psychotherapie-Ambulanz Marburg e.V.collaborator
Study Sites (1)
Philipps University Marburg, Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy
Marburg, 35037, Germany
Related Links
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Julia Anna Glombiewski
Philipps-University Marburg, Departement of Clinical PSychology and Psychotherapy
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Dr. Julia A. Glombiewski
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 10, 2015
First Posted
May 17, 2017
Study Start
June 1, 2015
Primary Completion
June 1, 2017
Study Completion
June 1, 2017
Last Updated
July 5, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share